Characteristics and Demographics of Patients Requiring Emergent Air Medical

Background As integrated health systems become more common, interfacility patient transfers will increase and air transport programs will be prioritized. Understanding characteristics of patients triaged to air medical transport will assist with resource allocation and needs assessment. The objective of this study was to investigate the demographics and clinical characteristics of patients that presented to the emergency department (ED) and subsequently required emergent air medical interfacility transport. Methods This was a retrospective, multicenter study conducted at eight hospitals within Northwell Health, the largest academic health system in New York state. The study was conducted between December 1, 2014, and July 31, 2020, and included patients who presented to an ED and subsequently required emergent air medical interfacility transport. Results Overall, the median age was 37 years (IQR 4–66), and 231 (54%) subjects were males. The majority of subjects (59%) had no reported comorbidities, arrived by ambulance (52%), and were emergency severity index triage 2 (48%). Frequent indications for transfer were nontraumatic neurologic (37%), pulmonary or respiratory (13%), trauma (12%), and cardiovascular (12%). Most patients were not ventilated before transport (71%). The median time to call for transport at the sending institution was 2:42 hours (IQR 1:14–6:54), and the median length of stay was 4:12 (IQR 2:31–8:48). Most patients were subsequently admitted (96%) at the receiving institution to an intensive care unit (72%). Conclusions This study describes patients' demographic and clinical characteristics who required emergent air medical transport. Helicopter transport is costly, and data from these patients may further help our understanding of who is transported by air and how important air transport is to the health system.

[1]  R. Stolker,et al.  Characteristics, management and outcome of prehospital pediatric emergencies by a Dutch HEMS , 2021, European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery.

[2]  S. Johnsen,et al.  Association of Helicopter vs Ground Emergency Medical Transportation With 1-Year Mortality in Denmark , 2021, JAMA network open.

[3]  S. Johnsen,et al.  Mortality and hospitalisation in the Danish Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) population from 2014 to 2018: a national population-based study of HEMS triage , 2020, BMJ Open.

[4]  Hasan Hawilo,et al.  Interfacility helicopter transfers for critically ill patients: always the right choice? , 2020, Critical Care.

[5]  M. Pasquier,et al.  HEMS inter-facility transfer: a case-mix analysis , 2018, BMC Emergency Medicine.

[6]  P. Dischinger,et al.  Does helicopter transport improve outcomes independently of emergency medical system time? , 2013, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[7]  B. Nahed,et al.  Interfacility Helicopter Ambulance Transport of Neurosurgical Patients: Observations, Utilization, and Outcomes from a Quaternary Level Care Hospital , 2011, PloS one.

[8]  Stephen I. Rennard,et al.  Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine , 2011 .

[9]  J. Svenson,et al.  Is air transport faster? A comparison of air versus ground transport times for interfacility transfers in a regional referral system. , 2006, Air medical journal.

[10]  T. Blackwell Interfacility Transports , 2002, Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine.

[11]  Lorraine Giordano,et al.  U TILIZATION OF A IR M EDICAL T RANSPORT IN A L ARGE U RBAN E NVIRONMENT : A R ETROSPECTIVE A NALYSIS , 2001, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[12]  D. O'Brien,et al.  The evolution of air transport systems: a pictorial review. , 1988, The Journal of emergency medicine.