Diffusion-Weighted Imaging with Sensitivity Encoding (SENSE) for Detecting Cranial Bone Marrow Metastases: Comparison with T1-Weighted Images

Objective This study was designed to determine whether diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with sensitivity encoding (SENSE) could detect bone marrow involvement in patients with cranial bone marrow (CBM) metastases. DWI results obtained were compared with T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) findings. Materials and Methods DWI with sensitivity encoding (SENSE; b value = 1,000) was performed consecutively in 13 patients with CBM metastases diagnosed pathologically and radiologically. CBM lesions were dichotomized according to the involved site, i.e., skull base or calvarium. Two radiologists qualitatively evaluated the relative conspicuousness of CBM lesions and image qualities in B0 and in isotropic DWI and in T1WI. According to region of interest analysis of normal and pathologic marrow for these three sequences, absolute signal difference percentages (SD%) were calculated to quantitatively analyze lesion contrast. Results All 20 lesions in 13 patients with CBM metastases revealed abnormal DWI signals in areas corresponding to T1WI abnormalities. Both skull base and calvarial lesions provided better lesion conspicuousness than T1WI and B0 images. Although the image quality of DWI was less satisfactory than that of T1WI, relatively good image qualities were obtained. Quantitatively, B0 images (SD%, 82.1 ±7.9%) showed better lesion contrast than isotropic DWI (SD%, 71.4 ±13.7%) and T1WI (SD%, 65.7 ±9.3%) images. Conclusion For scan times of less than 30 seconds, DWI with SENSE was able to detect bone marrow involvement, and was superior to T1WI in terms of lesion conspicuity. DWI with SENSE may be helpful for the detection of cranial bone/bone marrow metastases when used in conjunction with conventional MR sequences.

[1]  O. Schober,et al.  Whole-body MR imaging for detection of bone metastases in children and young adults: comparison with skeletal scintigraphy and FDG PET. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  J. Tobey,et al.  MR imaging characteristics of cranial bone marrow in adult patients with underlying systemic disorders compared with healthy control subjects. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[3]  B. Marincek,et al.  The value of bone scintigraphy, bone marrow scintigraphy and fast spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging in staging of patients with malignant solid tumours: a prospective study , 1993, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  B. Mock,et al.  High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of suspected brain infarction. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[5]  W A Murphy,et al.  Bone marrow imaging. , 1988, Radiology.

[6]  W. Peh,et al.  Acute vertebral body compression fractures: discrimination between benign and malignant causes using apparent diffusion coefficients. , 2002, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  H. Imhof,et al.  Vertebral metastases: assessment with apparent diffusion coefficient. , 2002, Radiology.

[8]  K. Friedrich,et al.  Diffusion weighted imaging of bone marrow pathologies. , 2005, European journal of radiology.

[9]  Naoto T Ueno,et al.  Bone imaging in metastatic breast cancer. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  T. Takahara,et al.  Diffusion weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS): technical improvement using free breathing, STIR and high resolution 3D display. , 2004, Radiation medicine.

[11]  A. Agildere,et al.  MRI evaluation of cranial bone marrow signal intensity and thickness in chronic anemia. , 2005, European journal of radiology.

[12]  D. Louis,et al.  Bone marrow imaging. , 1989, Radiology.

[13]  B. Glimelius,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diffuse Malignant Bone Marrow Diseases , 1987, Acta radiologica.

[14]  M Deimling,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of bone marrow: differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fractures. , 1998, Radiology.

[15]  M. Reiser,et al.  Techniques for diffusion-weighted imaging of bone marrow. , 2005, European journal of radiology.

[16]  J. Finsterbusch,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of metastatic disease of the spine: assessment of response to therapy. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[17]  R. Stollberger,et al.  Improved diffusion‐weighted single‐shot echo‐planar imaging (EPI) in stroke using sensitivity encoding (SENSE) , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  W. Reinus,et al.  MR imaging of bone marrow lesions: relative conspicuousness on T1-weighted, fat-suppressed T2-weighted, and STIR images. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  M. Castillo,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging offers no advantage over routine noncontrast MR imaging in the detection of vertebral metastases. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[20]  Xiaohong Joe Zhou,et al.  Characterization of benign and metastatic vertebral compression fractures with quantitative diffusion MR imaging. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[21]  R. Daffner,et al.  MRI in the detection of malignant infiltration of bone marrow. , 1986, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  A. Rahmouni,et al.  Normal age-related patterns of cellular and fatty bone marrow distribution in the axial skeleton: MR imaging study. , 1990, Radiology.

[23]  V. Jellús,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of intracerebral masses: comparison with conventional MR imaging and histologic findings. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[24]  S. Maier,et al.  Quantitative assessment of diffusion abnormalities in benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures by line scan diffusion-weighted imaging. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.