A Framework of Risk in Global IT Projects and Mitigation Strategies from Service-Oriented Architecture

Global Information Technology (IT) projects span multiple locations that are typically employing different practices, adhering to different standards, and using different technologies – at the same time operating in highly diverse cultures. Differences such as these are prevalent factors that increase risk on global IT projects. Further, they are prone to changing continuously over the course of a project, with the consequence that risk becomes highly unpredictable and dynamic. This chapter proposes a framework to characterize risks within the people-process-technology-external elements of a global IT project. The framework gives particular consideration to risks that arise from interactions of multiplicities within and between those elements (i.e. dynamic risks). The principles of Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) are adopted to propose specific strategies for mitigation of these dynamic risks. Two case studies further illustrate how those strategies can mitigate the risks.

[1]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Implications of space and time for distributed work: an interpretive study of US–Norwegian systems development teams , 2004, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[2]  M. Huysman,et al.  Keeping the Wheels Turning: The Dynamics of Managing Networks of Practice , 2010 .

[3]  Paul Lillrank,et al.  Processes, episodes and events in health service supply chains , 2011 .

[4]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Managing Risks in Distributed Software Projects: An Integrative Framework , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[5]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[6]  Francis G. McCabe,et al.  Reference Model for Service Oriented Architecture 1.0 , 2006 .

[7]  Kathryn B. Laskey,et al.  Service oriented architecture , 2009 .

[8]  Vijayan Sugumaran,et al.  A framework for creating hybrid‐open source software communities , 2002, Inf. Syst. J..

[9]  Brahim Herbane,et al.  Business Continuity Management: Time for a strategic role? , 2004 .

[10]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  From IT Leveraging Competence to Competitive Advantage in Turbulent Environments: The Case of New Product Development , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Christoph Schroth,et al.  The Service-Oriented Enterprise , 2007 .

[12]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations , 1999, IBM Syst. J..

[13]  J. Stewart Black,et al.  Cross-Cultural Training Effectiveness: A Review and a Theoretical Framework for Future Research , 1990 .

[14]  Carol Saunders,et al.  EDITOR’S COMMENTS Volume 29 Iss. 4 , 2005 .

[15]  Jerry N. Luftman Key Issues for IT Executives 2004 , 2005, MIS Q. Executive.

[16]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Governance practices and software maintenance: A study of open source projects , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[17]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  Aligning IT components to achieve agility in globally distributed system development , 2006, CACM.

[18]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Guest Editors' Introduction: Global Software Development , 2001, IEEE Softw..

[19]  M. Pfadenhauer,et al.  At Eye Level: The Expert Interview — a Talk between Expert and Quasi-expert , 2009 .

[20]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Team Knowledge and Coordination in Geographically Distributed Software Development , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology adaption: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team 1 , 2000 .

[22]  Fadi P. Deek,et al.  Risk Management for Collaborative Software Development , 2006, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[23]  Joseph Natovich,et al.  Vendor Related Risks in IT Development: A Chronology of an Outsourced Project Failure , 2003, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[24]  Paul Týma Why are we using Java again? , 1998, CACM.

[25]  James H. Liu,et al.  Distance Matters: Physical Space and Social Impact , 1995 .

[26]  Roger B. Dannenberg,et al.  Query by humming with the VocalSearch system , 2006, CACM.

[27]  Karine Barzilai-Nahon,et al.  (PRE-PRINT DRAFT - DECEMBER, 2007, JASIST-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY) TOWARD A THEORY OF NETWORK GATEKEEPING: A FRAMEWORK FOR EXPLORING INFORMATION CONTROL , 2007 .

[28]  Sachidanandam Sakthivel,et al.  Virtual workgroups in offshore systems development , 2005, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[29]  Aldo Dagnino,et al.  Agile Software Development in Large Organizations , 2004, Computer.

[30]  Hans-Georg Gemünden,et al.  Interteam Coordination, Project Commitment, and Teamwork in Multiteam R&D Projects: A Longitudinal Study , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[31]  Martin Karlsson,et al.  Complexity Perception - Model Development And Analysis Of Two Technical Platform Projects In The Mobile Phones Industry , 2004, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[32]  Sanjay Bose,et al.  Impact of service-oriented architecture on enterprise systems, organizational structures, and individuals , 2005, IBM Syst. J..

[33]  P. Pasini,et al.  Service co-production and value co-creation: The case for a service-oriented architecture (SOA) , 2008 .

[34]  Jun-Jang Jeng,et al.  System Dynamics Modeling for SOA Project Management , 2007, IEEE International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications (SOCA '07).

[35]  Michael A. Cusumano Managing software development in globally distributed teams , 2008, CACM.

[36]  Aurora Vizcaíno,et al.  Collaboration Tools for Global Software Engineering , 2010, IEEE Software.

[37]  Danny Berry,et al.  Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain , 1999 .

[38]  Rafik I. Beekun,et al.  Organization Structure from a Loose Coupling Perspective: A Multidimensional Approach , 2001, Decis. Sci..

[39]  Tsutomu Fujinami,et al.  A Knowledge Management System for Dynamic Organizational Knowledge Circulation , 2007, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[40]  Blake Ives,et al.  Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research , 2004, DATB.

[41]  One-Ki Daniel Lee,et al.  Managing Dynamic Risks in Global IT Projects: Agile Risk-Management using the Principles of Service-Oriented Architecture , 2013, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[42]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[43]  K. Subramanian,et al.  Leveraging Resources in Global Software Development , 2001, IEEE Softw..

[44]  Tao Chen,et al.  Comparing senior executive and project manager perceptions of IT project risk: a Chinese Delphi study , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[45]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  Globally distributed component-based software development: an exploratory study of knowledge management and work division , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[46]  Alex H. B. Duffy,et al.  Coordination Approaches and Systems – Part I: A Strategic Perspective , 2000 .

[47]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  Innovating or Doing as Told? Status Differences and Overlapping Boundaries in Offshore Collaboration , 2008, MIS Q..

[48]  K. Barzilai-Nahon Toward a theory of network gatekeeping , 2008 .