SI-traceable monoelemental solutions on the highest level of accuracy: 25 years from the foundation of CCQM to recent advances in the development of measurement methods

Within the Working Group on Inorganic Analysis (IAWG) of the Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance: Metrology in Chemistry and Biology (CCQM) international key comparisons and pilot studies related to inorganic analysis are carried to ensure consistency in this field at the highest level. Some of these comparisons deal directly with the preparation and characterization of monoelemental solutions or with topics, closely related. The importance of monoelemental solutions lies in the fact that almost every measurement in inorganic analysis relies on the comparison with either a reference material, or references in form of solutions, usually (mono)elemental solutions. All quantitative measurement approaches, e.g. isotope dilution or standard addition, need an accurate reference solution made from a well characterized reference material, prepared under full gravimetric control. These primary (monoelemental) solutions do not only serve as arbitrary references/calibration solutions, but they also link up measurement results to the International System of units (SI), this way establishing the so-called metrological traceability to a measurement unit of the SI. Without such solutions on the highest possible level of accuracy and with the smallest possible associated uncertainties (for e.g. element content and/or impurities), an analysis itself can never be as good as it could be with appropriate reference solutions. This article highlights select key comparisons and pilot studies dealing with monoelemental solution-related topics within the IAWG from the foundation of CCQM—25 years ago—up to latest achievements in the field of inorganic analysis.

[1]  G. Turk,et al.  Establishing comparability and compatibility in the purity assessment of high purity zinc as demonstrated by the CCQM-P149 intercomparison , 2018 .

[2]  Jochen Vogl,et al.  Roadmap for the purity determination of pure metallic elements , 2017 .

[3]  O. Rienitz,et al.  Characterization of a series of absolute isotope reference materials for magnesium: ab initio calibration of the mass spectrometers, and determination of isotopic compositions and relative atomic weights , 2016 .

[4]  O. Rienitz,et al.  Preparation and characterization of primary magnesium mixtures for the ab initio calibration of absolute magnesium isotope ratio measurements , 2016 .

[5]  L. Bergamaschi,et al.  The linkup of mono-elemental solutions to the SI using INAA: a measurement procedure and the achievable uncertainty , 2015, Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry.

[6]  B. Güttler,et al.  Gravimetric preparation and characterization of primary reference solutions of molybdenum and rhodium , 2015, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[7]  H. Kipphardt,et al.  Determination of major nonmetallic impurities in magnesium by glow discharge mass spectrometry with a fast flow source using sintered and pressed powder samples , 2014, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[8]  G. Turk,et al.  Final report of the key comparison CCQM-K72: Purity of zinc with respect to six defined metallic analytes , 2014 .

[9]  D. Schiel,et al.  Known purity—the fundament of element determination by atomic spectrometry , 2013 .

[10]  CCQM Guidance note: Estimation of a consensus KCRV and associated Degrees of Equivalence , 2013 .

[11]  G. Turk,et al.  Final report on CCQM-K87: Mono-elemental calibration solutions , 2012 .

[12]  G. Turk,et al.  Purity determination as needed for the realisation of primary standards for elemental determination: status of international comparability , 2009 .

[13]  Ralf Matschat,et al.  Purity assessment for providing primary standards for elemental determination – a snap shot of international comparability , 2008 .

[14]  Ralf Matschat,et al.  Metrology in chemistry – a rocky road , 2008 .

[15]  Ralf Matschat,et al.  Traceability system for elemental analysis , 2006 .

[16]  P. De Bièvre,et al.  Atomic weights of the elements. Review 2000 (IUPAC Technical Report) , 2009 .

[17]  P. De Bièvre,et al.  ATOMIC WEIGHTS OF THE ELEMENTS: REVIEW 2000 , 2003 .

[18]  Mike Sargent,et al.  Book review: Guidelines for Achieving High Accuracy in Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometry (IDMS) , 2002 .

[19]  Helene Felber,et al.  Final report on key comparison CCQM-K8 of monoelemental calibration solutions , 2002 .

[20]  I. Papadakis,et al.  CCQM-K2 key comparison: cadmium and lead content in natural water , 2001 .

[21]  B King,et al.  Metrology and analytical chemistry: Bridging the cultural gap , 1997 .

[22]  B King Metrology and analytical chemistry: bridging the cultural gap , 1997 .