Results from recent detachment experiments in alternative divertor configurations on TCV

Divertor detachment is explored on the TCV tokamak in alternative magnetic geometries. Starting from typical TCV single-null shapes, the poloidal flux expansion at the outer strikepoint is varied by a factor of 10 to investigate the X-divertor characteristics, and the total flux expansion is varied by 70% to study the properties of the super-X divertor. The effect of an additional X-point near the target is investigated in X-point target divertors. Detachment of the outer target is studied in these plasmas during Ohmic density ramps and with the ion {$\nabla $} B drift away from the primary X-point. The detachment threshold, depth of detachment, and the stability of the radiation location are investigated using target measurements from the wall-embedded Langmuir probes and two-dimensional CIII line emissivity profiles across the divertor region, obtained from inverted, toroidally-integrated camera data. It is found that increasing poloidal flux expansion results in a deeper detachment for a given line-averaged density and a reduction in the radiation location sensitivity to core density, while no large effect on the detachment threshold is observed. The total flux expansion, contrary to expectations, does not show a significant influence on any detachment characteristics in these experiments. In X-point target geometries, no evidence is found for a reduced detachment threshold despite a 2–3 fold increase in connection length. A reduced radiation location sensitivity to core plasma density in the vicinity of the target X-point is suggested by the measurements.

[1]  L. Giannone,et al.  Partial detachment of high power discharges in ASDEX Upgrade , 2015 .

[2]  D. N. Hill,et al.  Effect of changes in separatrix magnetic geometry on divertor behaviour in DIII-D , 2013 .

[3]  S. Brezinsek,et al.  Plasma-surface interaction in the Be/W environment: Conclusions drawn from the JET-ILW for ITER , 2015 .

[4]  M. Wischmeier.  Simulating divertor detachment in the TCV and JET tokamaks , 2005 .

[5]  H. Takase.  Guidance of Divertor Channel by Cusp-Like Magnetic Field for Tokamak Devices , 2001 .

[6]  D. Ryutov,et al.  Corrigendum: The ‘churning mode’ of plasma convection in the tokamak divertor region (2014 Phys. Scr. 89 088002) , 2015 .

[7]  K. Burrell,et al.  Fast gas injection system for plasma physics experiments , 1984 .

[8]  P. Stangeby.  The Plasma Boundary of Magnetic Fusion Devices , 2000 .

[9]  W. Fundamenski.  Power and Particle Exhaust in Tokamaks: Integration of Plasma Scenarios with Plasma Facing Materials and Components , 2009 .

[10]  S. Brezinsek,et al.  JET divertor diagnostic upgrade for neutral gas analysis. , 2012, The Review of scientific instruments.

[11]  Philippe Ghendrih,et al.  The Plasma Boundary of Magnetic Fusion Devices , 2001 .

[12]  J. Contributors,et al.  High density operation for reactor-relevant power exhaust , 2015 .

[13]  J. Contributors,et al.  Measurements of beryllium sputtering yields at JET , 2011 .

[14]  B. P. Duval,et al.  Numerical study of potential heat flux mitigation effects in the TCV snowflake divertor , 2016 .

[15]  B. Duval,et al.  Detachment Dynamics on the TCV Tokamak , 2016 .

[16]  T. Petrie,et al.  Physics of the detached radiative divertor regime in DIII-D , 1999 .

[17]  N. Asakura,et al.  Balance of ionization and recombination of carbon ions in high density peripheral plasmas of the JT-60 U tokamak , 2009 .

[18]  P. Stangeby,et al.  Experimental divertor physics , 1997 .

[19]  F. Jenko,et al.  Core transport analysis of nitrogen seeded H-mode discharges in the ASDEX Upgrade , 2012 .

[20]  D. N. Hill,et al.  Multi-Machine Scaling of the Divertor Peak Heat Flux and Width for L-Mode and H-Mode Discharges , 1999 .

[21]  Brian Labombard,et al.  Analysis of a multi-machine database on divertor heat fluxesa) , 2011 .

[22]  J. Schweinzer,et al.  Impurity seeding for tokamak power exhaust: from present devices via ITER to DEMO , 2013 .

[23]  D. Ryutov,et al.  The ‘churning mode’ of plasma convection in the tokamak divertor region , 2014 .

[24]  S. Coda,et al.  Power distribution in the snowflake divertor in TCV , 2013 .

[25]  Brent Covele,et al.  Magnetic geometry and physics of advanced divertors: The X-divertor and the snowflake , 2013, 1309.5289.

[26]  B. Duval,et al.  Experimental studies of the snowflake divertor in TCV , 2017 .

[27]  D. Coster,et al.  The influence of molecular dynamics on divertor detachment in TCV , 2004 .

[28]  Brent Covele,et al.  An exploration of advanced X-divertor scenarios on ITER , 2013, 1312.3560.

[29]  R. Felton,et al.  The impact of divertor detachment on carbon sources in JET L-mode discharges , 2009 .

[30]  Vladislav Kotov,et al.  Consequences of a reduction of the upstream power SOL width in ITER , 2013 .

[31]  B. Lipschultz,et al.  Divertor Physics Research on Alcator C-Mod , 2007 .

[32]  D. Ryutov,et al.  Local properties of the magnetic field in a snowflake divertor , 2010 .

[33]  B. Lipschultz,et al.  Sensitivity of detachment extent to magnetic configuration and external parameters , 2016 .

[34]  Y. R. Martin,et al.  TCV divertor upgrade for alternative magnetic configurations , 2017 .

[35]  J. Contributors,et al.  Scaling of the tokamak near the scrape-off layer H-mode power width and implications for ITER , 2013 .

[36]  R. H. Bulmer,et al.  The super X divertor (SXD) and a compact fusion neutron source (CFNS) , 2010 .

[37]  M. Beurskens,et al.  Progress at JET in integrating ITER-relevant core and edge plasmas within the constraints of an ITER-like wall , 2015 .

[38]  M. Wischmeier,et al.  A new experimental classification of divertor detachment in ASDEX Upgrade , 2013 .

[39]  M. Sugihara,et al.  A full tungsten divertor for ITER: Physics issues and design status , 2013 .

[40]  N. Asakura,et al.  Radiation process of carbon ions in JT-60U detached divertor plasmas , 2009 .

[41]  David Ward,et al.  On the physics guidelines for a tokamak DEMO , 2013 .

[42]  A. Loarte,et al.  Status and physics basis of the ITER divertor , 2009 .

[43]  Shuichi Takamura,et al.  Chapter 4: Power and particle control , 2007 .

[44]  J. R. Martin-Solis,et al.  Plasma detachment in JET Mark I divertor experiments , 1998 .

[45]  S. Coda,et al.  Advanced divertor configurations with large flux expansion , 2013 .

[46]  R. Dux,et al.  Electron density determination in the divertor volume of ASDEX Upgrade via Stark broadening of the Balmer lines , 2014 .

[47]  Gary D. Porter,et al.  Influence of E×B and ∇B drift terms in 2-D edge/SOL transport simulations , 1999 .

[48]  P. Valanju,et al.  On heat loading, novel divertors, and fusion reactors , 2006 .

[49]  T. Eich,et al.  Inter-ELM power decay length for JET and ASDEX upgrade: measurement and comparison with heuristic drift-based model. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[50]  T. Eich,et al.  Sheath heat transmission factors on TCV , 2007 .

[51]  Joseph V. Minervini,et al.  ADX: a high field, high power density, advanced divertor and RF tokamak , 2015 .

[52]  R. Neu,et al.  Plasma-wall interaction and plasma behaviour in the non-boronised all tungsten ASDEX Upgrade , 2009 .

[53]  P. Valanju,et al.  Super-X divertors and high power density fusion devices , 2009 .

[54]  Ulrich Stroth,et al.  Divertor studies in nitrogen induced completely detached H-modes in full tungsten ASDEX Upgrade , 2015 .

[55]  T. Eich,et al.  Effect of plasma geometry on divertor heat flux spreading: MONALISA simulations and experimental results from TCV , 2017 .

[56]  B. Duval,et al.  Divertor geometry effects on detachment in TCV , 2001 .

[57]  B. Duval,et al.  Spectroscopic investigations of divertor detachment in TCV , 2016, 1607.04539.

[58]  D. Ryutov.  Geometrical properties of a “snowflake” divertor , 2007 .

[59]  A. Fasoli,et al.  Practical solutions for reliable triple probe measurements in magnetized plasmas. , 2011, The Review of scientific instruments.

[60]  C. Theiler.  Basic Investigation of Turbulent Structures and Blobs of Relevance for Magnetic Fusion Plasmas , 2011 .

[61]  Stefano Coda,et al.  The Science Program of the TCV Tokamak: Exploring Fusion Reactor and Power Plant Concepts , 2015 .

[62]  K. Burrell.  Fast hydrogen gas injection system for plasma physics experiments. , 1978, The Review of scientific instruments.

[63]  M. Wischmeier,et al.  SOLPS analysis of the MAST-U divertor with the effect of heating power and pumping on the access to detachment in the Super-x configuration , 2015 .

[64]  P. Blanchard,et al.  ELM driven divertor target currents on TCV , 2003 .