Perceptual shape sensitivity to upright and inverted faces is reflected in neuronal adaptation

Using an fMR-adaptation paradigm for different face morphing levels we have recently demonstrated a narrow neuronal tuning to faces even at the sub-exemplar level which was tightly related to perceptual discrimination (Gilaie-Dotan and Malach, 2007). However, it is unclear whether this relationship is unique to faces or is a general property of object representations including unfamiliar objects, and whether the adaptation tuning is due to physical changes in the stimulus or to changes in perceptual discrimination. Here we compared the same face-morph paradigm for upright and inverted faces, thus modulating familiarity and perceptual discrimination effects while equating all low-level features. We found, as expected, a perceptual “inversion effect”, i.e. a significant reduction in inverted face discrimination. Importantly, the fMR-adaptation tuning in the fusiform face area (FFA) changed in accordance with the different perceptual sensitivity both for upright and inverted faces. Additional object selective regions displayed differential tuning widths to the two categories. Our results are compatible with a model by which the ability of human observers to discriminate objects depends on the shape tuning properties of individual neurons.

[1]  M. Farah,et al.  What is "special" about face perception? , 1998, Psychological review.

[2]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[3]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The effect of face inversion on the human fusiform face area , 1998, Cognition.

[4]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Neuronal population coding of movement direction. , 1986, Science.

[5]  Shimon Ullman,et al.  Class Information Predicts Activation by Object Fragments in Human Object Areas , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  Joris Vangeneugden,et al.  Stimulus Similarity-Contingent Neural Adaptation Can Be Time and Cortical Area Dependent , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  V. Bruce,et al.  Remembering facial configurations , 1991, Cognition.

[8]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Revisiting the Perception of Upside-Down Faces , 2000, Psychological science.

[9]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  3D shape perception from combined depth cues in human visual cortex , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  T. Hendler,et al.  Contrast sensitivity in human visual areas and its relationship to object recognition. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  An Area within Human Ventral Cortex Sensitive to “Building” Stimuli Evidence and Implications , 1998, Neuron.

[12]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition , 2001, Vision Research.

[13]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity , 2006, Vision Research.

[14]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Analysis of the Neuronal Selectivity Underlying Low fMRI Signals , 2002, Current Biology.

[18]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Center–periphery organization of human object areas , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  A. Martínez,et al.  The AR face databasae , 1998 .

[20]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Stimulus inversion and the responses of face and object-sensitive cortical areas. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[21]  T. Allison,et al.  Face recognition in human extrastriate cortex. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. , 1996, Annual review of neuroscience.

[23]  M. Farah,et al.  What causes the face inversion effect? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  I. Fried,et al.  Ultra-fine frequency tuning revealed in single neurons of human auditory cortex , 2008, Nature.

[25]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  Cortical correlates of face and scene inversion: A comparison , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  Aleix M. Martinez,et al.  The AR face database , 1998 .

[27]  K. Grill-Spector The neural basis of object perception , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[28]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  A. Dale,et al.  New images from human visual cortex , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[30]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Face inversion disproportionately impairs the perception of vertical but not horizontal relations between features , 2007 .

[31]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[32]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[33]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces? , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Neural Basis of the Behavioral Face-Inversion Effect , 2005, Current Biology.

[35]  R. Malach,et al.  Sub-exemplar shape tuning in human face-related areas. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  M. Farah Is face recognition ‘special’? Evidence from neuropsychology , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[37]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  What's lost in inverted faces? , 1993, Cognition.

[38]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  A face feature space in the macaque temporal lobe , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[40]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[41]  I. Gauthier,et al.  How does the brain process upright and inverted faces? , 2002, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[42]  A. Treves,et al.  Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  Rafael Malach,et al.  One Picture Is Worth at Least a Million Neurons , 2004, Current Biology.

[44]  T. Valentine,et al.  Towards an Exemplar Model of Face Processing: The Effects of Race and Distinctiveness , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[45]  Yan Liu,et al.  Time course and stimulus dependence of repetition-induced response suppression in inferotemporal cortex. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  B. Rossion,et al.  Recovery from adaptation to facial identity is larger for upright than inverted faces in the human occipito-temporal cortex , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Large-Scale Mirror-Symmetry Organization of Human Occipito-Temporal Object Areas , 2003, Neuron.

[48]  S. Edelman,et al.  Human Brain Mapping 6:316–328(1998) � A Sequence of Object-Processing Stages Revealed by fMRI in the Human Occipital Lobe , 2022 .

[49]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  F. Fang,et al.  Duration-dependent FMRI adaptation and distributed viewer-centered face representation in human visual cortex. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[51]  T. Valentine Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. , 1988, British journal of psychology.

[52]  M. Giese,et al.  Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex , 2006, Nature.

[53]  Anthony J. Movshon,et al.  Optimal representation of sensory information by neural populations , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[54]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The Effect of Face Inversion on Activity in Human Neural Systems for Face and Object Perception , 1999, Neuron.

[55]  G. Orban,et al.  Selectivity of Neuronal Adaptation Does Not Match Response Selectivity: A Single-Cell Study of the fMRI Adaptation Paradigm , 2006, Neuron.

[56]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-sensitive regions in human extrastriate cortex studied by functional MRI. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[57]  M. Riesenhuber,et al.  Evaluation of a Shape-Based Model of Human Face Discrimination Using fMRI and Behavioral Techniques , 2006, Neuron.

[58]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Face inversion disproportionately impairs the perception of vertical but not horizontal relations between features. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[59]  Giuseppe Iaria,et al.  The correlates of subjective perception of identity and expression in the face network: An fMRI adaptation study , 2009, NeuroImage.

[60]  C. Olson,et al.  Repetition suppression in monkey inferotemporal cortex: relation to behavioral priming. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[61]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Multisubject fMRI Studies and Conjunction Analyses , 1999, NeuroImage.

[62]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[63]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Functional analysis of the periphery effect in human building related areas , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[64]  J W Belliveau,et al.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Science.