The effect of distinctive visual information on false recognition

Using the false memory paradigm (Deese, 1959), recently revived by Roediger and McDermott (1995), we examined the effect on true and false recognition of presenting study items in unusual looking fonts. In one condition, each font was associated with a single study item. In a second condition, each font was presented 12 times per study list, randomly distributed across several themes. In a third condition, each font was presented 12 times in the study list, and was associated with a particular study theme. False recognition levels were lowest when there was a unique association between each font and a single study item, whereas false recognition levels were highest when all items from a theme were presented in the same font. Further, the effects of font condition on false recognition of lures maintained when font condition was manipulated within participants and lists. These results, taken together, are inconsistent with theories proposing that false recognition reduction is the product of global shifts in response strategies across conditions (e.g., Schacter, Israel, & Racine, 1999). However, perspectives highlighting the effects of memory based processes on true and false recognition provide an adequate account.

[1]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  When False Recognition Meets Metacognition: The Distinctiveness Heuristic , 2002 .

[2]  J T Wixted,et al.  The case against a criterion-shift account of false memory. , 2000, Psychological review.

[3]  J. Wixted,et al.  On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  J. S. Nairne,et al.  Design controversies and the generation effect: Support for an item-order hypothesis , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[5]  K. McDermott,et al.  Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. , 1995 .

[6]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  D. Schacter,et al.  “If I had said it I would have remembered it: Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Pictorial encoding reduces false recognition of semantic associates , 1997 .

[9]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Suppressing False Recognition in Younger and Older Adults: The Distinctiveness Heuristic ☆ ☆☆ ★ , 1999 .

[10]  E. Tulving.  Memory and consciousness. , 1985 .

[11]  Kathleen B. McDermott,et al.  Priming on perceptual implicit memory tests can be achieved through presentation of associates , 1997 .

[12]  R. Reed Hunt,et al.  Presentation modality affects false memory , 1998 .

[13]  Lynne M Reder,et al.  Perceptual match effects in direct tests of memory: The role of contextual fan , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[14]  J. Wixted.  Subjective memorability and the mirror effect. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  E. Hirshman,et al.  True and False Recognition in MINERVA2: Explanations from a Global Matching Perspective , 1998 .

[16]  H L Roediger,et al.  Modality effects in false recall and false recognition. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  John R. Anderson,et al.  A partial resolution of the paradox of interference: The role of integrating knowledge , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  THE ROLE OF ORDER INFORMATION IN FREE RECALL : APPLICATION TO THE WORD-FREQUENCY EFFECT , 1996 .

[19]  Jason M. Blackwell,et al.  Memory Illusions: Recalling, Recognizing, and Recollecting Events that Never Occurred , 1996 .

[20]  Bradford H. Challis,et al.  Stratification in cognition and consciousness , 1999 .

[21]  L. Reder,et al.  A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: a computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  E. Hirshman,et al.  Decision processes in recognition memory: criterion shifts and the list-strength paradigm. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  C. Phillips,et al.  Journal of Memory and Language , 2001 .

[24]  Gilles O. Einstein,et al.  Levels of processing and organization: Additive effects of individual-item and relational processing. , 1980 .

[25]  A. Henik,et al.  The false memory and the mirror effects: The role of familiarity and backward association in creating false recollections☆ , 2005 .

[26]  James J. Jenkins,et al.  STUDIES ON THE ROLE OF LANGUAGE IN BEHAVIOR - THE COMPLETE MINNESOTA NORMS FOR RESPONSES TO 100 WORDS FROM THE KENT-ROSANOFF WORD ASSOCIATION TEST , 1954 .

[27]  B. Underwood.  FALSE RECOGNITION PRODUCED BY IMPLICIT VERBAL RESPONSES. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[29]  D. Nelson,et al.  What is the connection between true and false memories? The differential roles of interitem associations in recall and recognition. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  G. Einstein,et al.  Relational and item-specific information in memory , 1981 .

[31]  V. Reyna,et al.  Fuzzy-trace theory and false memory: Memory theory in the courtroom. , 2000 .

[32]  L. Reder,et al.  Integrated knowledge in different tasks: The role of retrieval strategy on fan effects , 1983 .

[33]  A. Yonelinas.  Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[34]  L. Reder,et al.  A reexamination of stimulus-frequency effects in recognition: two mirrors for low- and high-frequency pseudowords. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  D. Bjorklund.  False-memory creation in children and adults : theory, research, and implications , 2000 .

[36]  Lynne M. Reder,et al.  The role of spurious feature familiarity in recognition memory , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  E. Hirshman,et al.  Discriminating alternative conceptions of false recognition: The cases of word concreteness and word frequency. , 1997 .

[38]  H L Roediger,et al.  Norms for word lists that create false memories , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[39]  M. Humphreys.  Item and relational information: A case for context independent retrieval , 1978 .

[40]  S Rajaram,et al.  Perceptual effects on remembering: recollective processes in picture recognition memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  Journal of Memory and Language , 2001 .

[42]  Michael B. Miller,et al.  Theoretical commentary: The role of criterion shift in false memory. , 1999 .

[43]  False memories and statistical decision theory: comment on Miller and Wolford (1999) and Roediger and McDermott (1999) , 2000, Psychological review.

[44]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  False Alarms About False Memories , 1999 .

[45]  Suparna Rajaram.  9. Assessing the nature of retrieval experience: Advances and challenges , 1999 .

[46]  J. Deese.  On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[47]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  The Enigma of Organization and Distinctiveness , 1993 .