Advanced REACH Tool (ART): overview of version 1.0 and research needs.

This paper provides an outline of the Advanced REACH Tool (ART) version 1.0 and a discussion of how it could be further developed. ART is a higher tier exposure assessment tool that combines mechanistically modelled inhalation exposure predictions with available exposure data using a Bayesian approach. ART assesses exposure for scenarios across different plants and sites. Estimates are provided for different percentiles of the exposure distribution and confidence intervals around the estimate. It also produces exposure estimates in the absence of data, but uncertainty of the estimates will decrease when results of exposure measurements are included. The tool has been calibrated using a broad range of exposure data and provides estimates for exposure to vapours, mists, and dusts. ART has a robust and stable conceptual basis but will be refined in the future and should therefore be considered an evolving system. High-priority areas for future research are identified in this paper and include the integration of partially analogous measurement series, inclusion of company and site-specific assessments, user decision strategies linked to ART predictions, evaluation of validity and reliability of ART, exploring the possibilities for incorporating the dermal route and integration of ART predictions with tools for modelling internal dose. ART is initially developed in the scope of REACH but is equally useful for exposure assessment in other areas.

[1]  Sudipto Banerjee,et al.  Rating Exposure Control Using Bayesian Decision Analysis , 2006, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[2]  Gurumurthy Ramachandran,et al.  Toward better exposure assessment strategies--the new NIOSH initiative. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[3]  Derk Brouwer,et al.  Advanced REACH Tool: development and application of the substance emission potential modifying factor. , 2011, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[4]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Conceptual model for assessment of inhalation exposure: defining modifying factors. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[5]  W. Fransman,et al.  Development and evaluation of an exposure control efficacy library (ECEL). , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[6]  Max Henrion,et al.  Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis , 1990 .

[7]  T. Schneider,et al.  Validation of a New Method for Structured Subjective Assessment of Past Concentrations , 1999 .

[8]  Elaine A. Cohen Hubal,et al.  Exposure as Part of a Systems Approach for Assessing Risk , 2009, Environmental health perspectives.

[9]  Steven K. Gibb.  Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. , 2008, Reproductive toxicology.

[10]  S M Rappaport,et al.  An exposure-assessments strategy accounting for within- and between-worker sources of variability. , 1995, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[11]  Erik Tielemans,et al.  'Stoffenmanager', a web-based control banding tool using an exposure process model. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[12]  H. Kromhout,et al.  Cross-validation and refinement of the Stoffenmanager as a first tier exposure assessment tool for REACH , 2009, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[13]  Hans Marquart,et al.  RISKOFDERM: risk assessment of occupational dermal exposure to chemicals. An introduction to a series of papers on the development of a toolkit. , 2003, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[14]  J Tickner,et al.  Evaluation and further development of EASE model 2.0. , 2005, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[15]  M. Nicas,et al.  Estimating exposure intensity in an imperfectly mixed room. , 1996, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[16]  R. Vermeulen,et al.  DREAM: a method for semi-quantitative dermal exposure assessment. , 2003, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[17]  W. Chan,et al.  A meta-analytic approach for characterizing the within-worker and between-worker sources of variation in occupational exposure. , 2006, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[18]  S. Maidment.  Occupational hygiene considerations in the development of a structured approach to select chemical control strategies. , 1998, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[19]  William Popendorf,et al.  Industrial Hygiene Control of Airborne Chemical Hazards , 2006 .

[20]  J. Bailar,et al.  Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[21]  Wouter Fransman,et al.  Revisiting the effect of room size and general ventilation on the relationship between near- and far-field air concentrations. , 2011, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[22]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Advanced REACH Tool (ART): calibration of the mechanistic model. , 2011, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[23]  Erik Tielemans,et al.  Classification of occupational activities for assessment of inhalation exposure. , 2011, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[24]  E. Symanski,et al.  A comprehensive evaluation of within- and between-worker components of occupational exposure to chemical agents. , 1993, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[25]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Advanced Reach Tool (ART): development of the mechanistic model. , 2011, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[26]  Carlos Rodriguez,et al.  The ECETOC approach to targeted risk assessment; lessons and experiences relevant to REACH , 2007, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[27]  H Kromhout,et al.  Conceptual model for assessment of dermal exposure. , 1999, Occupational and environmental medicine.