Gender and Modes of Collaboration in an Engineering Classroom

Research suggests that men and women have different communicative styles that contribute to women's lack of acceptance in male-dominated fields. However, this perspective can lead to stereotypes that limit the range of interactional strategies open to individuals. This article profiles two women from student engineering teams who participated in a study on collaboration and the role of gender. The study, which used a qualitative approach to data collection and analysis, showed that men and women alike displayed both gender-linked and non-gender-linked behavior. It also showed that successful collaboration was influenced less by gender and more by such factors as a strong work ethic, team commitment, and effective leadership.

[1]  H. Blumer,et al.  Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method , 1988 .

[2]  Lisa Ede,et al.  Singular Texts/Plural Authors: Perspectives on Collaborative Writing , 1990 .

[3]  M. Lind.  The gender impact of temporary virtual work groups , 1999 .

[4]  Teresa Moore,et al.  What Experienced Collaborators Say About Collaborative Writing , 1987 .

[5]  L. Grant,et al.  Women in Engineering: Gender, Power, and Work Place Culture. , 1993 .

[6]  R. Felder,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention. III. Gender Differences in Student Performance and Attitudes , 1995 .

[7]  Nancy Roundy Blyler,et al.  Pedagogy and Social Action , 1995 .

[8]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[9]  Robert L. Kahn,et al.  The Dynamics of Interviewing: Theory, Technique, and Cases. , 1957 .

[10]  Robert L. Kahn,et al.  The dynamics of interviewing; theory, technique, and cases , 1958 .

[11]  Janna Gallaher,et al.  Women's Perceptions of the Climate in Engineering Technology Programs , 2000 .

[12]  Carol Roever,et al.  Teamwork Preparing Students for the New Reality , 1994 .

[13]  N. Lyons.  Two Perspectives: On Self, Relationships, and Morality. , 1983 .

[14]  C. Gilligan.  In a Different Voice. Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA (Harvard University Press) 1982. , 1982 .

[15]  Mary M. Lay,et al.  Interpersonal Conflict in Collaborative Writing: What We Can Learn from Gender Studies , 1989 .

[16]  Hugh Mehan.  Language and Power in Organizational Process. , 1987 .

[17]  Rebecca E. Burnett.  Substantive Conflict in a Cooperative Context: A Way to Improve the Collaborative Planning of Workplace Documents. , 1991 .

[18]  Anne Parker.  Problem Solving Applied to Teaching Technical Writing. , 1990 .

[19]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Gender and Democracy in Computer-Mediated Communication , 1995, Computerization and Controversy, 2nd Ed..

[20]  Karen L. Tonso.  Student Learning and Gender , 1996 .

[21]  D. Tannen.  You just don't understand: women and men in conversation. morrow , 1990 .

[22]  Daphne Patai,et al.  Women's words , 1994 .

[23]  Deborah Tannen,et al.  Talking from 9 to 5: How Women's and Men's Conversational Styles Affect Who Gets Heard, Who Gets Credit, and What Gets Done at Work. , 1996 .

[24]  Nancy Roundy Blyler,et al.  Professional communication : the social perspective , 1993 .

[25]  Philip Lewis,et al.  Assessing Teaming Skills Acquisition on Undergraduate Project Teams , 1998 .

[26]  Sandra Ingram.  Gender and Modes of Collaboration in Engineering: Technical Communication asa Social Process , 1998 .

[27]  D. Padgett.  Qualitative Methods in Social Work Research: Challenges and Rewards , 1998 .

[28]  Alice M. Gillam,et al.  New Visions of Collaborative Writing , 1991 .

[29]  Anne Parker.  Evaluating Collaborative Projects and Evaluation Tools: Putting the Pieces of theCollaborative Puzzle Together , 1995 .

[30]  B. Glaser.  Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory , 1978 .

[31]  C. Brodsky.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research , 1968 .

[32]  M. Jimmie Killingsworth,et al.  Behavioral Talk-Write as a Method for Teaching Technical Editing , 1987 .