Cracking the Tinder Code: An Experience Sampling Approach to the Dynamics and Impact of Platform Governing Algorithms

_This article conceptualizes algorithmically-governed platforms as the outcomes of a structuration process involving three types of actors: platform owners/developers, platform users, and machine learning algorithms. This threefold conceptualization informs media effects research, which still struggles to incorporate algorithmic influence. It invokes insights into algorithmic governance from platform studies and (critical) studies in the political economy of online platforms. This approach illuminates platforms’ underlying technological and economic logics, which allows to construct hypotheses on how they appropriate algorithmic mechanisms, and how these mecha- nisms function. The present study tests the feasibility of experience sampling to test such hypothe- ses. The proposed methodology is applied to the case of mobile dating app Tinder._

[1]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[2]  Ethem Alpaydin,et al.  Introduction to machine learning , 2004, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[3]  Tarleton Gillespie,et al.  The politics of ‘platforms’ , 2010, New Media Soc..

[4]  J. Bryant,et al.  Media effects : advances in theory and research , 2002 .

[5]  Ian Gray,et al.  Three maps and three misunderstandings: A digital mapping of climate diplomacy , 2014, Big Data Soc..

[6]  B. Latour.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory , 2005 .

[7]  A. Leyshon,et al.  Platform capitalism: the intermediation and capitalization of digital economic circulation , 2017 .

[8]  Stefanie Duguay.  Dressing up Tinderella: interrogating authenticity claims on the mobile dating app Tinder , 2016 .

[9]  Adrian Mackenzie,et al.  Programming subjects in the regime of anticipation: Software studies and subjectivity , 2013 .

[10]  Jenna Burrell,et al.  How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms , 2016 .

[11]  Matthew Crain,et al.  The limits of transparency: Data brokers and commodification , 2018, New Media Soc..

[12]  Anne Helmond,et al.  The Platformization of the Web: Making Web Data Platform Ready , 2015 .

[13]  E. Diener,et al.  Further validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. , 1991, Journal of personality assessment.

[14]  Freddy MacKee,et al.  Social Media in Gay London: Tinder as an Alternative to Hook-Up Apps , 2016 .

[15]  K. Trzesniewski,et al.  Measuring Global Self-Esteem: Construct Validation of a Single-Item Measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale , 2001 .

[16]  Carolina Cambre,et al.  Screened Intimacies: Tinder and the Swipe Logic , 2016 .

[17]  Gregorio Martínez Pérez,et al.  A Context-Aware Interaction Model for the Analysis of Users' QoE in Mobile Environments , 2014, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[18]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  Relationshopping: Investigating the market metaphor in online dating , 2010 .

[19]  M. Slater.  Reinforcing Spirals: The Mutual Influence of Media Selectivity and Media Effects and Their Impact on Individual Behavior and Social Identity , 2007 .

[20]  Taina Bucher,et al.  The algorithmic imaginary: exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms , 2017, The Social Power of Algorithms.

[21]  Sylvia E. Peacock.  How web tracking changes user agency in the age of Big Data: The used user , 2014 .

[22]  J. Dijck.  The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media , 2013 .

[23]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Theorising big IT programmes in healthcare: strong structuration theory meets actor-network theory. , 2010, Social science & medicine.

[24]  Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick,et al.  Choice and Preference in Media Use : Advances in Selective Exposure Theory and Research , 2014 .

[25]  Guy Harrison,et al.  Next Generation Databases , 2015, Apress.

[26]  C. Fuchs.  Digital Labour and Karl Marx , 2013 .

[27]  Peter Neijens,et al.  Measuring Media Exposure in a Changing Communications Environment , 2016 .

[28]  Anja Bechmann,et al.  Using APIs for Data Collection on Social Media , 2014, Inf. Soc..

[29]  C. Fuchs,et al.  Reconsidering Value and Labour in the Digital Age , 2015 .

[30]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Experience Sampling Method: Measuring the Quality of Everyday Life , 2006 .

[31]  Paul D. Allison,et al.  Logistic regression using sas®: theory and application , 1999 .

[32]  Christian Sandvig,et al.  Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook , 2018, New Media Soc..

[33]  Joel M. Hektner,et al.  Experience sampling method , 2007 .

[34]  Michele Willson,et al.  Algorithms (and the) everyday , 2017, The Social Power of Algorithms.