Maintaining Communication Links Using a Team of Mobile Robots

This paper presents a comprehensive metric to evaluate the link quality and the corresponding control schemes for the distributed control of a team of robots to maintain the communication links. The mobile robots dynamically reconfigure themselves to maintain reliable end-to-end communication links. Such applications require online measurements of communication quality in real time and require a mapping between link quality and robot positions. In this paper, we present the empirical results and analysis of a link variability study for an indoor and outdoor environments including received signal strength indicator (RSSI), throughput and packet loss rate. The distributed control algorithms consider the environmental constrains and obstacles. Moreover, the self-deployment algorithms allow a team of robots to recognize the coverage gap by monitoring link qualities, and deploy the mobile robots for a variety of applications including self-healing, tethering, intelligent relaying. The assessment of link quality acts as the feedback for cooperative control of mobile robots. The experimental results have shown the effectiveness of evaluation for communication links and the related control schemes.

[1]  Michael R. Souryal,et al.  Link assessment in an indoor 802.11 network , 2006, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2006. WCNC 2006..

[2]  Michael R. Souryal,et al.  Channel-adaptive relaying in mobile ad hoc networks with fading , 2005, 2005 Second Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, 2005. IEEE SECON 2005..

[3]  Aiguo Song,et al.  An empirical analysis for evaluating the link quality of robotic sensor networks , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Wireless Communications & Signal Processing.

[4]  Thomas C. Henderson,et al.  Leveraging RSSI for Robotic Repair of Disconnected Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  C. Dixon,et al.  Controlling the Mobility of Network Nodes using Decentralized Extremum Seeking , 2006, Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[6]  Eric W. Frew,et al.  Maintaining Optimal Communication Chains in Robotic Sensor Networks using Mobility Control , 2007, Mob. Networks Appl..

[7]  Petter Ögren,et al.  Cooperative control of mobile sensor networks:Adaptive gradient climbing in a distributed environment , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[8]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Connectivity management in mobile robot teams , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  D.A. Lawrence,et al.  Lyapunov Guidance Vector Fields for Unmanned Aircraft Applications , 2007, 2007 American Control Conference.

[10]  Michael R. Souryal,et al.  Real-time deployment of multihop relays for range extension , 2007, MobiSys '07.

[11]  Y. Charlie Hu,et al.  Deployment of mobile robots with energy and timing constraints , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[12]  Rajeev Shorey,et al.  Performance of TCP and UDP protocols in multi-hop multi-rate wireless networks , 2004, 2004 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8733).

[13]  Jindong Tan.  A scalable graph model and coordination algorithms for multi-robot systems , 2005, Proceedings, 2005 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics..

[14]  Christian F. Tschudin,et al.  Coping with communication gray zones in IEEE 802.11b based ad hoc networks , 2002, WOWMOM '02.