Preoperative assessment of pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures by orthopaedic residents and orthopaedic surgeons: is there a difference?

Background: The urgency of pediatric supracondylar humeral (SCH) fracture treatment is influenced by preoperative evaluation and neurovascular integrity. This assessment often is completed by a resident. The purpose of this analysis was to determine differences in assessments made by orthopaedic residents and attending physicians in patients with supracondylar humeral fractures. Methods: Data were collected on 210 children with displaced supracondylar humeral fractures. A standardized 15-variable checklist was completed by an orthopaedic resident and attending physician. For each variable, Stuart-Maxwell and McNemar tests were used to determine significant differences (P<0.05) in marginal frequencies between the two cohorts. Cohen's kappa analysis (&kgr;) quantified agreement between residents’ and attending physicians’ findings. &Kgr; > 0.75 was considered excellent, 0.40-0.75 moderate, and < 0.40 marginal-poor. Results: The agreement between resident and attending physicians was 89%. Three variables had excellent agreement: hand temperature and color (&kgr;~1), and Gartland fracture type (&kgr;=0.81). Moderate agreement was observed for fracture direction (&kgr;=0.68), pulse (&kgr;=0.52), and radial nerve motor function (&kgr;=0.49). The remaining variables: swelling, ecchymosis, motor function of the median, ulnar, anterior/posterior interosseous, and sensory function of the radial, median, and ulnar nerves had poor-marginal agreement (&kgr;-range:−0.042-0.388). Only the attending physicians noted neurovascular abnormalities in 38/63 documented instances (60%). There was no significant association between agreement and evaluation time intervals or resident experience. Conclusions: Resident physicians and attending physicians agreed in 89% of the documentation; however, disparities were present in nearly 60% of patients with neurovascular abnormalities. Educational initiatives should target improvement of resident performance in upper extremity neurovascular examination in children. With accurate initial assessment, proper care can be provided according to published guidelines.

[1]  Timothy B. Alton,et al.  Classifications In Brief: The Gartland Classification of Supracondylar Humerus Fractures , 2015, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  O. Ackermann,et al.  Ultrasound diagnosis of supracondylar fractures in children , 2014, European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery.

[3]  X. Jia,et al.  Diagnostic Errors in Orthopedic Surgery , 2013, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[4]  Z. Hadziahmetovic,et al.  RADIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT IN THE TREATMENT OF SUPRACONDYLAR HUMERUS FRACTURES IN CHILDREN , 2012, Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH.

[5]  P. McCann,et al.  The emergent assessment of supracondylar fractures of the paediatric humerus. , 2012, Hand surgery : an international journal devoted to hand and upper limb surgery and related research : journal of the Asia-Pacific Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand.

[6]  D. Flanigan,et al.  Implementation of an objective structured clinical exam (OSCE) into orthopedic surgery residency training. , 2012, Journal of surgical education.

[7]  R. Hau,et al.  Review article: Paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: Emergency assessment and management , 2010, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[8]  A. Perron,et al.  Orthopedic pitfalls in the ED: neurovascular injury associated with posterior elbow dislocations. , 2010, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[9]  M. Gotkine EDUCATION RESEARCH: ASSESSMENT OF NEUROLOGY RESIDENT CLINICAL COMPETENCIES IN THE NEUROLOGY CLINIC , 2009, Neurology.

[10]  L. Davis,et al.  Education Research: Assessment of neurology resident clinical competencies in the neurology clinic , 2009, Neurology.

[11]  A. Leet,et al.  Patterns of Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures , 2008, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[12]  D. Skaggs,et al.  Supracondylar humeral fractures in children , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  J. Heal,et al.  Reproducibility of the Gartland Classification for Supracondylar Humeral Fractures in Children , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic surgery.

[14]  Mark Baratz,et al.  Pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. , 2006, Hand clinics.

[15]  A. Diméglio,et al.  Neurovascular complications and severe displacement in supracondylar humerus fractures in children: defensive or offensive strategy? , 2006, Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B.

[16]  T. Kuivila,et al.  Pediatric elbow and forearm fractures requiring surgical treatment. , 2002, Hand clinics.

[17]  D. Skaggs,et al.  Reliability of a Modified Gartland Classification of Supracondylar Humerus Fractures , 2001, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[18]  J. Dormans,et al.  Acute neurovascular complications with supracondylar humerus fractures in children. , 1995, The Journal of hand surgery.

[19]  J. Gartland Management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. , 1959, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.