Detectable change of lung nodule volume with CT in a phantom study with high and low signal to background contrast

In previous work we developed a method for predicting the minimum detectable change (MDC) in nodule volume based on volumetric CT measurements. MDC was defined as the minimum increase/decrease in a nodule volume distinguishable from the baseline measurement at a specified level of detection performance, assessed using the area under the ROC curve (AUC). In this work we derived volume estimates of a set of synthetic nodules and calculated the detection performance for distinguishing them from baseline measurements. Eight spherical objects of 100HU radio density ranging in diameter from 5.0mm to 5.75mm and 8.0mm to 8.75mm with 0.25mm increments were placed in an anthropomorphic phantom with either no background (high-contrast task) or gelatin background (low-contrast task). The baseline was defined as 5.0mm for the first set of nodules and 8.0mm for the second set. The phantom was scanned using varying exposures, and reconstructed with slice thickness of 0.75, 1.5, and 3.0mm and two reconstruction kernels (standard and smooth). Volume measurements were derived using a previously developed matched- filter approach. Results showed that nodule size, slice thickness, and nodule-to-background contrast affected detectable change in nodule volume when using our volume estimator and the acquisition settings from our study. We also compared our experimental results to the values estimated by our previously-developed MDC prediction method. We found that experimental data for the 8mm baseline nodules matched very well with our predicted values of MDC. These results support considering the use of this metric when standardizing imaging protocols for lung nodule size change assessment.

[1]  Marios A Gavrielides,et al.  Pulmonary nodules with ground-glass opacity can be reliably measured with low-dose techniques regardless of iterative reconstruction: results of a phantom study. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  N. Petrick,et al.  Statistical analysis of lung nodule volume measurements with CT in a large-scale phantom study. , 2015, Medical physics.

[3]  Andrew J Buckler,et al.  Measurement of tumor volumes improves RECIST-based response assessments in advanced lung cancer. , 2012, Translational oncology.

[4]  Kyle J Myers,et al.  Minimum detectable change in lung nodule volume in a phantom CT study. , 2013, Academic radiology.

[5]  Kyle J Myers,et al.  Benefit of overlapping reconstruction for improving the quantitative assessment of CT lung nodule volume. , 2013, Academic radiology.

[6]  Kazuo Awai,et al.  Computer-aided volumetry of pulmonary nodules exhibiting ground-glass opacity at MDCT. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Quantitative CT: technique dependence of volume estimation on pulmonary nodules , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  M. Robins,et al.  Volumetric quantification of lung nodules in CT with iterative reconstruction (ASiR and MBIR). , 2013, Medical physics.

[9]  L. Tanoue,et al.  Variability of Lung Tumor Measurements on Repeat Computed Tomography Scans Taken Within 15 Minutes , 2012 .

[10]  N. Petrick,et al.  Volume estimation of low-contrast lesions with CT: a comparison of performances from a phantom study, simulations and theoretical analysis , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Marios A. Gavrielides,et al.  Evaluation of 1D, 2D and 3D nodule size estimation by radiologists for spherical and non-spherical nodules through CT thoracic phantom imaging , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[12]  M. Prokop,et al.  Lung nodule volumetry: segmentation algorithms within the same software package cannot be used interchangeably , 2010, European Radiology.

[13]  William Pao,et al.  A Pilot Study of Volume Measurement as a Method of Tumor Response Evaluation to Aid Biomarker Development , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[14]  Andreas Christe,et al.  Volumetric analysis of lung nodules in computed tomography (CT): comparison of two different segmentation algorithm softwares and two different reconstruction filters on automated volume calculation , 2014, Acta radiologica.

[15]  Kyle J Myers,et al.  Noncalcified lung nodules: volumetric assessment with thoracic CT. , 2009, Radiology.

[16]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Information-Theoretic Approach for Analyzing Bias and Variance in Lung Nodule Size Estimation With CT: A Phantom Study , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Sam Peterson,et al.  Inter-Method Performance Study of Tumor Volumetry Assessment on Computed Tomography Test-Retest Data. , 2015, Academic radiology.

[18]  Wendy J. Post,et al.  Volumetric measurement of pulmonary nodules at low-dose chest CT: effect of reconstruction setting on measurement variability , 2009, European Radiology.

[19]  O. Woo,et al.  Accuracy of lung nodule volumetry in low-dose CT with iterative reconstruction: an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom study. , 2014, The British journal of radiology.