Utilization of satellite data in land surface hydrology: sensitivity and assimilation

This paper investigates the sensitivity of potential evapotranspiration to input meteorological variables, viz- surface air temperature and surface vapor pressure. The sensitivity studies have been carried out for a wide range of land surface variables such as wind speed, leaf area index and surface temperatures. Errors in the surface air temperature and surface vapor pressure result in errors of different signs in the computed potential evapotranspiration. This result has implications for use of estimated values from satellite data or analysis of surface air temperature and surface vapor pressure in large scale hydrological modeling. The comparison of cumulative potential evapotranspiration estimates using ground observations and satellite observations over Manhattan, Kansas for a period of several months shows very little difference between the two. The cumulative differences between the ground based and satellite based estimates of potential evapotranspiration amounted to less that 20mm over a 18 month period and a percentage difference of 15%. The use of satellite estimates of surface skin temperature in hydrological modeling to update the soil moisture using a physical adjustment concept is studied in detail including the extent of changes in soil moisture resulting from the assimilation of surface skin temperature. The soil moisture of the surface layer is adjusted by 0.9mm over a 10 day period as a result of a 3K difference between the predicted and the observed surface temperature. This is a considerable amount given the fact that the top layer can hold only 5mm of water.

[1]  Joel Susskind,et al.  Determination of land surface skin temperatures and surface air temperature and humidity from TOVS HIRS2/MSU data , 1998 .

[2]  C. Jacobs,et al.  The Sensitivity of Regional Transpiration to Land-Surface Characteristics: Significance of Feedback , 1992 .

[3]  Piers J. Sellers,et al.  The first International Satellite Land Surface Climatology Project (ISLSCP) Field Experiment - FIFE , 1992 .

[4]  H. Pan,et al.  A two-layer model of soil hydrology , 1984 .

[5]  Lena Iredell,et al.  Characteristics of the TOVS Pathfinder Path A Dataset , 1997 .

[6]  Y. Mintz,et al.  The sensitivity of numerically simulated climates to land-surface boundary conditions , 1982 .

[7]  J. Feyen,et al.  COMPARISON BETWEEN MEASURED AND SIMULATED PLANT WATER POTENTIAL DURING SOIL WATER EXTRACTION BY POTTED RYEGRASS , 1980 .

[8]  Alan K. Betts,et al.  FIFE Surface Climate and Site-Average Dataset 1987–89 , 1998 .

[9]  Keith Beven,et al.  A sensitivity analysis of the Penman-Monteith actual evapotranspiration estimates , 1979 .

[10]  Richard H. McCuen,et al.  The role of sensitivity analysis in hydrologic modeling , 1973 .

[11]  J. Shukla,et al.  Influence of Land-Surface Evapotranspiration on the Earth's Climate , 1982, Science.

[12]  J. T. Holdeman,et al.  Sensitivity of a soil-plant-atmosphere model to changes in air temperature, dew point temperature, and solar radiation , 1981 .

[13]  D. Vidal-Madjar,et al.  Assimilation of soil moisture inferred from infrared remote sensing in a hydrological model over the HAPEX-MOBILHY region , 1994 .

[14]  Hosung Ahn,et al.  SENSITIVITY FOR CORRELATED INPUT VARIABLES AND PROPAGATED ERRORS IN EVAPOTRANSPIRATION ESTIMATES FROM A HUMID REGION , 1996 .

[15]  Dara Entekhabi,et al.  Solving the inverse problem for soil moisture and temperature profiles by sequential assimilation of multifrequency remotely sensed observations , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[16]  Eric Servat,et al.  Sensitivity of conceptual rainfall-runoff algorithms to errors in input data — case of the GR2M model , 1995 .

[17]  Venkat Lakshmi,et al.  A soil‐canopy‐atmosphere model for use in satellite microwave remote sensing , 1997 .

[18]  William L. Crosson,et al.  Toward a Dynamic-Thermodynamic Assimilation of Satellite Surface Temperature in Numerical Atmospheric Models , 1994 .

[19]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models , 1994 .

[20]  Joel Susskind,et al.  Comparison of TOVS-derived Land Surface Variables with Ground Observations , 2000 .

[21]  K. Saxton,et al.  Sensitivity analyses of the combination evapotranspiration equation , 1975 .

[22]  J. Garratt.  Sensitivity of Climate Simulations to Land-Surface and Atmospheric Boundary-Layer Treatments-A Review , 1993 .

[23]  Keith Beven,et al.  Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in land surface‐atmosphere flux predictions , 1997 .

[24]  Wilfried Brutsaert,et al.  Evaporation into the atmosphere : theory, history, and applications , 1982 .

[25]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of the biosphere‐atmosphere transfer scheme , 1996 .