Unraveling the Molecular Requirements for Macroscopic Silk Supercontraction.

Spider dragline silk is a protein material that has evolved over millions of years to achieve finely tuned mechanical properties. A less known feature of some dragline silk fibers is that they shrink along the main axis by up to 50% when exposed to high humidity, a phenomenon called supercontraction. This contrasts the typical behavior of many other materials that swell when exposed to humidity. Molecular level details and mechanisms of the supercontraction effect are heavily debated. Here we report a molecular dynamics analysis of supercontraction in Nephila clavipes silk combined with in situ mechanical testing and Raman spectroscopy linking the reorganization of the nanostructure to the polar and charged amino acids in the sequence. We further show in our in silico approach that point mutations of these groups not only suppress the supercontraction effect, but even reverse it, while maintaining the exceptional mechanical properties of the silk material. This work has imminent impact on the design of biomimetic equivalents and recombinant silks for which supercontraction may or may not be a desirable feature. The approach applied is appropriate to explore the effect of point mutations on the overall physical properties of protein based materials.

[1]  Lian Li,et al.  Design of superior spider silk: from nanostructure to mechanical properties. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[2]  M. Buehler,et al.  Sequence-structure correlations in silk: Poly-Ala repeat of N. clavipes MaSp1 is naturally optimized at a critical length scale. , 2012, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[3]  S. Rammensee,et al.  Assembly mechanism of recombinant spider silk proteins , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  D. Porter,et al.  Proline and processing of spider silks. , 2008, Biomacromolecules.

[5]  T. Shimanouchi,et al.  Interpretation of the doublet at 850 and 830 cm-1 in the Raman spectra of tyrosyl residues in proteins and certain model compounds. , 1975, Biochemistry.

[6]  S. Licoccia,et al.  The critical role of water in spider silk and its consequence for protein mechanics. , 2011, Nanoscale.

[7]  F. Kremer,et al.  Supercontraction in Nephila spider dragline silk - Relaxation into equilibrium state , 2011 .

[8]  David L. Kaplan,et al.  Silk: biology, structure, properties, and genetics , 1994 .

[9]  Z. Shao,et al.  The effect of solvents on spider silk studied by mechanical testing and single-fibre Raman spectroscopy. , 1999, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[10]  Oskar Liivak,et al.  Supercontraction and Backbone Dynamics in Spider Silk: 13C and 2H NMR Studies , 2000 .

[11]  R. W. Work A Comparative Study of the Supercontraction of Major Ampullate Silk Fibers of Orb-Web-Building Spiders (Araneae) , 1981 .

[12]  M. Buehler Computational and Theoretical Materiomics: Properties of Biological and de novo Bioinspired Materials , 2010 .

[13]  M. E. Demont,et al.  Spider silk as rubber , 1984, Nature.

[14]  Shu-Wei Chang,et al.  Osmotic pressure induced tensile forces in tendon collagen , 2015, Nature Communications.

[15]  J. Yarger,et al.  WISE NMR characterization of nanoscale heterogeneity and mobility in supercontracted Nephila clavipes spider dragline silk. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[16]  David T. Grubb,et al.  Fiber Morphology of Spider Silk: The Effects of Tensile Deformation , 1997 .

[17]  S. Wong,et al.  Supercontraction forces in spider dragline silk depend on hydration rate. , 2009, Zoology.

[18]  G. Plaza,et al.  Effect of water on Bombyx mori regenerated silk fibers and its application in modifying their mechanical properties , 2008 .

[19]  P. Argos,et al.  Rotamers: to be or not to be? An analysis of amino acid side-chain conformations in globular proteins. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  Z. Shao,et al.  Analysis of spider silk in native and supercontracted states using Raman spectroscopy , 1999 .

[21]  Markus J Buehler,et al.  Molecular mechanics of silk nanostructures under varied mechanical loading , 2012, Biopolymers.

[22]  James C. Weaver,et al.  Multi-scale thermal stability of a hard thermoplastic protein-based material , 2015, Nature Communications.

[23]  Markus J. Buehler,et al.  Theoretical and computational hierarchical nanomechanics of protein materials: Deformation and fracture , 2008 .

[24]  C. Holland,et al.  The science of silks , 2013 .

[25]  Z. Shao,et al.  Extended wet-spinning can modify spider silk properties. , 2005, Chemical communications.

[26]  Yi Liu,et al.  Relationships between supercontraction and mechanical properties of spider silk , 2005, Nature materials.

[27]  David L Kaplan,et al.  Silk-based biomaterials. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[28]  Fritz Vollrath,et al.  Spider Webs and Silks. , 1992 .

[29]  Markus J. Buehler,et al.  Spider silk: webs measure up. , 2013, Nature materials.

[30]  Ingi Agnarsson,et al.  Spider silk as a novel high performance biomimetic muscle driven by humidity , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[31]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[32]  Markus J. Buehler,et al.  Atomistic model of the spider silk nanostructure , 2010 .

[33]  F. Ko Engineering Properties of Spider Silk Fibers , 2004 .

[34]  T. Blackledge,et al.  Evolution of supercontraction in spider silk: structure–function relationship from tarantulas to orb-weavers , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[35]  G. Plaza,et al.  Self-tightening of spider silk fibers induced by moisture , 2003 .

[36]  Manuel Elices,et al.  The hidden link between supercontraction and mechanical behavior of spider silks. , 2011, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[37]  G. V. Guinea,et al.  Stretching of supercontracted fibers: a link between spinning and the variability of spider silk , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[38]  P. Fratzl,et al.  The role of topology and thermal backbone fluctuations on sacrificial bond efficacy in mechanical metalloproteins , 2014 .

[39]  David L Kaplan,et al.  Mapping domain structures in silks from insects and spiders related to protein assembly. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[40]  R. Lewis,et al.  Inducing β-sheets formation in synthetic spider silk fibers by aqueous post-spin stretching. , 2011, Biomacromolecules.

[41]  I. Um,et al.  Wet spinning of silk polymer. I. Effect of coagulation conditions on the morphological feature of filament. , 2004, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[42]  Ingi Agnarsson,et al.  How super is supercontraction? Persistent versus cyclic responses to humidity in spider dragline silk , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[43]  Markus J. Buehler,et al.  Nanostructure and molecular mechanics of spider dragline silk protein assemblies , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[44]  D. Porter,et al.  Two mechanisms for supercontraction in Nephila spider dragline silk. , 2011, Biomacromolecules.

[45]  G. Plaza,et al.  Relationship between microstructure and mechanical properties in spider silk fibers: identification of two regimes in the microstructural changes , 2012 .

[46]  Fritz Vollrath,et al.  Liquid crystalline spinning of spider silk , 2001, Nature.

[47]  D. Porter,et al.  Spider silk as a model biomaterial , 2006 .

[48]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[49]  T. Asakura,et al.  Characterization by Raman microspectroscopy of the strain-induced conformational transition in fibroin fibers from the silkworm Samia cynthia ricini. , 2006, Biomacromolecules.

[50]  Z. Shao,et al.  The effect of solvents on the contraction and mechanical properties of spider silk , 1999 .

[51]  Kristie J. Koski,et al.  Non-invasive determination of the complete elastic moduli of spider silks. , 2013, Nature materials.