International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity.

BACKGROUND Physical inactivity is a global concern, but diverse physical activity measures in use prevent international comparisons. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was developed as an instrument for cross-national monitoring of physical activity and inactivity. METHODS Between 1997 and 1998, an International Consensus Group developed four long and four short forms of the IPAQ instruments (administered by telephone interview or self-administration, with two alternate reference periods, either the "last 7 d" or a "usual week" of recalled physical activity). During 2000, 14 centers from 12 countries collected reliability and/or validity data on at least two of the eight IPAQ instruments. Test-retest repeatability was assessed within the same week. Concurrent (inter-method) validity was assessed at the same administration, and criterion IPAQ validity was assessed against the CSA (now MTI) accelerometer. Spearman's correlation coefficients are reported, based on the total reported physical activity. RESULTS Overall, the IPAQ questionnaires produced repeatable data (Spearman's rho clustered around 0.8), with comparable data from short and long forms. Criterion validity had a median rho of about 0.30, which was comparable to most other self-report validation studies. The "usual week" and "last 7 d" reference periods performed similarly, and the reliability of telephone administration was similar to the self-administered mode. CONCLUSIONS The IPAQ instruments have acceptable measurement properties, at least as good as other established self-reports. Considering the diverse samples in this study, IPAQ has reasonable measurement properties for monitoring population levels of physical activity among 18- to 65-yr-old adults in diverse settings. The short IPAQ form "last 7 d recall" is recommended for national monitoring and the long form for research requiring more detailed assessment.

[1]  K. Geisinger Cross-Cultural Normative Assessment: Translation and Adaptation Issues Influencing the Normative Interpretation of Assessment Instruments. , 1994 .

[2]  R. Devellis,et al.  Cross-Cultural Translation , 1994 .

[3]  K. Patrick,et al.  Physical Activity and Public Health: A Recommendation From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine , 1995 .

[4]  P. Williams,et al.  Physical activity and public health. , 1995, JAMA.

[5]  P. A. Mauer,et al.  Physical activity and public health. , 1995, JAMA.

[6]  J. Sallis Measuring Physical Activity and Energy Expenditure , 1996 .

[7]  Wim H. M. Saris,et al.  Measuring Physical Activity and Energy Expenditure , 1996 .

[8]  Mark A Pereira,et al.  A collection of Physical Activity Questionnaires for health-related research. , 1997, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[9]  P S Freedson,et al.  Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[10]  M. Booth,et al.  Assessment of Physical Activity: An International Perspective , 2000, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[11]  U. Ekelund,et al.  Field Evaluation of the Computer Science and Application's Inc. Activity Monitor during Running and Skating Training in Adolescent Athletes , 2000, International journal of sports medicine.

[12]  B E Ainsworth,et al.  Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[13]  J F Nichols,et al.  Assessment of Physical Activity with the Computer Science and Applications, Inc., Accelerometer: Laboratory versus Field Validation , 2000, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[14]  J F Sallis,et al.  Assessment of physical activity by self-report: status, limitations, and future directions. , 2000, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[15]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[16]  P. Freedson,et al.  Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[17]  P S Freedson,et al.  Objective Monitoring of Physical Activity Using Motion Sensors and Heart Rate , 2000, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[18]  U. Ekelund,et al.  Physical activity assessed by activity monitor and doubly labeled water in children. , 2001, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[19]  A. Manley Physical Activity And Health: A Report Of The Surgeon General , 2004 .