Form Frequency, Markedness and Strategies in Second Language Performance Modelling

Recent research has brought to light a range of factors which underly native language performance phenomena, including formal similarity or difference, linearity and proximity factors, frequency judgements, the availability of unmarked forms, and general cognitive strategies. On the basis of a substantial (70,000 word) machine-readable corpus of second-language written productions by anglophone learners of French, it is shown that such factors can make a substantial contribution to the modelling of second-language learner errors. Detailed examples are discussed in the areas of spelling errors, gender assignment, and gender and number agreement. The tendencies isolated on the basis of the corpus data are then modelled using a natural-language generation environment.

[1]  Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al.  Phonological Resolution of Syntactic Feature Conflict , 1986 .

[2]  Lise,et al.  Exceptional Language And Linguistics , 1984 .

[3]  Peter Peterson.  Establishing verb agreement with disjunctively conjoined subjects: Strategies vs principles∗ , 1986 .

[4]  G. David Ripley,et al.  A Statistical Analysis of Syntax Errors , 1978, Comput. Lang..

[5]  Henri Frei,et al.  La grammaire des fautes , 1930 .

[6]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Cognitive Modeling and Intelligent Tutoring , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[7]  A. Cutler,et al.  Malapropisms and the structure of the mental lexicon , 1977 .

[8]  W. N. Francis,et al.  Proximity Concord in English , 1986 .

[9]  J. Aarts,et al.  Corpus linguistics : recent developments in the use of computer corpora in English language research , 1984 .

[10]  Lydia White,et al.  Universal Grammar and second language acquisition , 1989 .

[11]  J. Laver,et al.  Slips of the tongue. , 1968, The British journal of disorders of communication.

[12]  G. Corbett.  The agreement hierarchy , 1979, Journal of Linguistics.

[13]  Henrietta J. Cedergren,et al.  Variable Rules: Performance as a Statistical Reflection of Competence , 1974 .

[14]  Jean Véronis,et al.  Computerized correction of phonographic errors , 1988, Comput. Humanit..

[15]  William C. Mann,et al.  Natural Language Generation in Artificial Intelligence and Computational Linguistics , 1990 .

[16]  Michael Levison,et al.  Gregory Lessard: Application of Attribute Grammars to Natural Language Sentence Generation , 1990, WAGA.

[17]  David Birdsong.  Metalinguistic Performance and Interlinguistic Competence , 1989 .

[18]  William R. Swartout,et al.  A Reactive Approach to Explanation: Taking the User’s Feedback into Account , 1991 .