English Locative Inversion: A Constraint-Based Approach

English locative inversion (LI) constructions exhibit various intriguing properties. Central concern includes how to capture the mixed properties of the preverbal PP and the postverbal NP: the preverbal PP functions both as a subject and topic, while the postverbal NP has subject and focus properties at the same time. Departing from configurational approaches (Newmeyer 1987, Coopmans 1989, Hoekstra and Mulder 1990, Rochemont and Culicover 1990, among others), this paper attributes such intriguing and mixed properties of the constructions to the interaction of enriched lexical information of the lexemes occurring in LI and construction-specific constraints. In particular, the paper claims that LI is a result of different mapping relations among grammatical function structure (valence structure), argument structure, and discourse structure. In particular, the information structure in which the locative PP carries topic and the theme represents focus in a sense triggers the PP to be realized as syntactic subject and the NP to be object. Together with such a mapping constraint, the paper shows that constraints on the phrase locative-inv-ph and its supertypes, whose existence is independently motivated by English grammar, play crucial roles in accounting for phenomena such as freezing effects.

[1]  Gosse Bouma,et al.  Satisfying Constraints on Extraction andAdjunction , 2001 .

[2]  Leif Kvistgaard Jakobsen,et al.  Inversion in Present-Day English , 1974 .

[3]  P. Culicover,et al.  English Focus Constructions and the Theory of Grammar , 1990 .

[4]  Jong-Bok Kim English Locative Inversion: Grammatical Interfaces and Constructions , 2003 .

[5]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction , 1999, Computational Linguistics.

[6]  Elisabet Engdahl,et al.  Information Packaging in HPSG , 1996 .

[7]  Betty J. Birner,et al.  Information status and noncanonical word order in English , 1998 .

[8]  Jean-Pierre Koenig,et al.  Lexical and Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation , 1998 .

[9]  H. Hughes The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language , 2003 .

[10]  P. Coopmans,et al.  Where Stylistic and Syntactic Processes Meet: Locative Inversion in English , 1989 .

[11]  Betty J. Birner,et al.  Information Status and Word Order: An Analysis of English Inversion. , 1994 .

[12]  Joan Bresnan,et al.  Locative inversion in Chichewa: a case study of factorization in grammar , 1989 .

[13]  T. Hoekstra,et al.  UNERGATIVES AS COPULAR VERBS; LOCATIONAL AND EXISTENTIAL PREDICATION , 1990 .

[14]  Adjuncts as Complements : Evidence from Case , 2022 .

[15]  Michael Rochemont,et al.  Focus in Generative Grammar , 1986 .

[16]  R. Levine,et al.  On focus inversion: syntactic valence and the role of a SUBCAT list , 1989 .

[17]  Peter W. Culicover,et al.  Stylistic Inversion In English: A Reconsideration , 2001 .

[18]  Joan Bresnan Locative Inversion and the Architecture of Universal Grammar. , 1994 .