Effect of nonsolvents on properties of spinning solutions and polyethersulfone hollow fiber ultrafiltration membranes

Abstract The relationship among the presence of nonsolvent additives, the rheological behavior of spinning solutions and properties of hollow fiber membranes was studied. The additives tested were water, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) and polyethylene glycol (PEG), and the base mixture was polyethersulfone/N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (PES–NMP). In addition the effect of combining water and PVP or PEG was also studied. Membranes were prepared using a spinneret having two concentric orifices. The internal coagulant used as well as the nonsolvent from the coagulation bath were both water at 28°C and 30°C, respectively. Rheological properties of polymer solutions were evaluated using a rheometer Haake RV 20. Changes on composition of spin-solutions were also evaluated in terms of membrane water permeability, solute rejection and membrane structure observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Experimental results from this work showed that spinning solutions containing any of the three additives behave as Newtonian fluids in the range of shearing rates tested. The addition of water, PVP or PEG to the base PES–NMP solution increased its viscosity and this effect was independent of the type of additive used. A direct relation between viscosity of casting solutions and membrane thickness was found. However, rheological properties (viscosity and normal stress difference) could not be used to explain differences on membrane water flux (MWF) when using different additives at the same concentration. The addition of any of the three additives generally increased MWF. The extent of this increment seemed to be more related to changes on membrane porosity than changes on pore sizes induced by the nature and concentration of the additive used.

[1]  K. Peinemann,et al.  Preparation of hollow fiber membranes from polyetherimide for gas separation , 1992 .

[2]  C. M. Tam,et al.  Polysulfone membranes II. Performance comparison of polysulfone-poly-(N-vinyl-pyrrolidone) membranes , 1993 .

[3]  R. Boom.  Membrane formation by immersion precipitation: The role of a polymeric additive , 1992 .

[4]  P. Carreau,et al.  On correlations of primary normal stresses in polymer solutions , 1989 .

[5]  I. Cabasso,et al.  Polysulfone hollow fibers. II. Morphology , 1977 .

[6]  Hiroshi Yanagishita,et al.  SELECTION CRITERIA FOR SOLVENT AND GELATION MEDIUM IN THE PHASE INVERSION PROCESS , 1994 .

[7]  William J. Koros,et al.  Phase separation, vitrification, and the manifestation of macrovoids in polymeric asymmetric membranes , 1996 .

[8]  S. Sourirajan,et al.  Solution-Spun Hollow Fiber Polysulfone and Polyethersulfone Ultrafiltration Membranes , 1992 .

[9]  W. L. Thayer,et al.  Polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes , 1983 .

[10]  Jan Feijen,et al.  Phase-Separation Processes in Polymer-Solutions in Relation to Membrane Formation , 1996 .

[11]  T. Matsuura,et al.  Effect of poly(vinylpyrrolidone) additive on the performance of poly(ether sulfone) ultrafiltration membranes , 1987 .

[12]  I. Cabasso,et al.  Polysulfone hollow fibers. I. Spinning and properties , 1976 .

[13]  S. Sourirajan,et al.  The Effect of Polyethersulfone Concentration on Flat and Hollow Fiber Membrane Performance , 1993 .

[14]  R. Boom,et al.  Recent advances in the formation of phase inversion membranes made from amorphous or semi-crystalline polymers , 1996 .

[15]  T. Matsuura,et al.  Retention of polyvinylpyrrolidone swelling agent in the poly(ether p-phenylenesulfone) ultrafiltration membrane , 1990 .

[16]  Remko M. Boom,et al.  Microstructures in phase-inversion membranes. Part I. Formation of macrovoids , 1992 .