Influence of methane emissions and vehicle efficiency on the climate implications of heavy-duty natural gas trucks.

While natural gas produces lower carbon dioxide emissions than diesel during combustion, if enough methane is emitted across the fuel cycle, then switching a heavy-duty truck fleet from diesel to natural gas can produce net climate damages (more radiative forcing) for decades. Using the Technology Warming Potential methodology, we assess the climate implications of a diesel to natural gas switch in heavy-duty trucks. We consider spark ignition (SI) and high-pressure direct injection (HPDI) natural gas engines and compressed and liquefied natural gas. Given uncertainty surrounding several key assumptions and the potential for technology to evolve, results are evaluated for a range of inputs for well-to-pump natural gas loss rates, vehicle efficiency, and pump-to-wheels (in-use) methane emissions. Using reference case assumptions reflecting currently available data, we find that converting heavy-duty truck fleets leads to damages to the climate for several decades: around 70-90 years for the SI cases, and 50 years for the more efficient HPDI. Our range of results indicates that these fuel switches have the potential to produce climate benefits on all time frames, but combinations of significant well-to-wheels methane emissions reductions and natural gas vehicle efficiency improvements would be required.

[1]  James J Winebrake,et al.  Total Fuel-Cycle Analysis of Heavy-Duty Vehicles Using Biofuels and Natural Gas-Based Alternative Fuels , 2011, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[2]  E. Kort,et al.  Methane Leaks from North American Natural Gas Systems , 2014, Science.

[3]  Kaarle Kupiainen,et al.  Simultaneously Mitigating Near-Term Climate Change and Improving Human Health and Food Security , 2012, Science.

[4]  H. S. Matthews,et al.  Natural gas fugitive emissions rates constrained by global atmospheric methane and ethane. , 2014, Environmental Science and Technology.

[5]  A. Ingraffea,et al.  Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations , 2011 .

[6]  Harry C. Watson,et al.  Fuel-cycle greenhouse gas emissions from alternative fuels in Australian heavy vehicles , 2002 .

[7]  J. Shoemaker,et al.  What Role for Short-Lived Climate Pollutants in Mitigation Policy? , 2013, Science.

[8]  Well-to Wheel Greenhouse Gas Emissions of LNG Used as a Fuel for Long Haul Trucks in a European Scenario , 2013 .

[9]  Gabrielle Pétron,et al.  A new look at methane and nonmethane hydrocarbon emissions from oil and natural gas operations in the Colorado Denver‐Julesburg Basin , 2014 .

[10]  Barbara Zielinska,et al.  Air impacts of increased natural gas acquisition, processing, and use: a critical review. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Michael Q. Wang,et al.  Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of shale gas, natural gas, coal, and petroleum. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  James J Winebrake,et al.  Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Greg Rideout,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from heavy-duty vehicles , 2008 .

[14]  K. Caldeira,et al.  Greenhouse gases, climate change and the transition from coal to low-carbon electricity , 2012 .

[15]  A. Elgowainy,et al.  Updated Fugitive Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Natural Gas Pathways in the GREET1_2014 Model , 2014 .

[16]  Jeff Peischl,et al.  Quantifying atmospheric methane emissions from the Haynesville, Fayetteville, and northeastern Marcellus shale gas production regions , 2015 .

[17]  Gabrielle Pétron,et al.  Methane emissions estimate from airborne measurements over a western United States natural gas field , 2013 .