Modelling procurement effects on cooperation

Cooperative arrangements, such as partnering, have received increased interest in recent years. Several studies show however that cooperative relationships are not easily achieved in construction. Implementation of cooperative relationships requires changes in several elements of the traditional procurement procedures. The purpose of this paper is therefore to propose and test a sequential model regarding clients' cooperative procurement procedures. We especially ask: what elements in clients' procurement procedures facilitate the establishment of cooperation and trust in their relationships with contractors? The model was tested through structural equation modelling. The empirical data required for the test were collected through a survey responded to by 87 Swedish professional construction clients. The empirical results show that cooperative procurement procedures are triggered by clients' wish to involve contractors early in specification, which has a simultaneous effect on procedures regarding bid invitation and compensation. Furthermore, these simultaneous effects breed a certain kind of partner selection based on task‐related attributes, which also has a direct positive effect on trust and above all on cooperation in client–contractor relationships. Besides these implications from the model, the improvement of measurements for future modelling is discussed.

[1]  J. Barlow,et al.  Innovation and learning in complex offshore construction projects , 2000 .

[2]  W. Dugger.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[3]  Per Erik Eriksson,et al.  Procurement and Governance Management - Development of a Conceptual Procurement Model Based on Different Types of Control** , 2006 .

[4]  Michael Riley,et al.  New Project Procurement Process , 2001 .

[5]  Preet S. Aulakh,et al.  Trust and Performance in Cross-Border Marketing Partnerships: A Behavioral Approach , 1996 .

[6]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  An analytical hierarchy process based procurement selection method , 2001 .

[7]  Marek Korczynski.  THE LOW-TRUST ROUTE TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: INTER-FIRM RELATIONS IN THE UK ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY IN THE 1980S AND 1990S , 1996 .

[8]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  Client‐led strategies for construction supply chain improvement , 2004 .

[9]  A. Grandori.  An Organizational Assessment of Interfirm Coordination Modes , 1997 .

[10]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  Structural Equation Model of Trust and Partnering Success , 2005 .

[11]  Robert E. Spekman.  Strategic supplier selection: Understanding long-term buyer relationships , 1988 .

[12]  Michael Y. Mak,et al.  Problematic issues associated with project partnering — the contractor perspective , 2002 .

[13]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Bad for Practice: A Critique of the Transaction Cost Theory , 1996 .

[14]  Ashok Jashapara,et al.  Towards positive partnering: Revealing the realities in the construction industry , 1997 .

[15]  J. M. Geringer,et al.  Strategic Determinants of Partner Selection Criteria in International Joint Ventures , 1991 .

[16]  Steven Tadelis,et al.  Incentives Versus Transaction Costs: A Theory of Procurement Contracts , 2001 .

[17]  J. Hagen,et al.  Trust in Japanese Interfirm Relations: Institutional Sanctions Matter , 1998 .

[18]  A. Akintoye,et al.  A survey of supply chain collaboration and management in the UK construction industry , 2000 .

[19]  Mike Bresnen,et al.  Building partnerships: case studies of clientcontractor collaboration in the UK construction industry , 2000 .

[20]  K. I. Gidado,et al.  Project complexity: The focal point of construction production planning , 1996 .

[21]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  ALLIANCES IN INDUSTRIAL PURCHASING - THE DETERMINANTS OF JOINT ACTION IN BUYER-SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS , 1990 .

[22]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  An empirical study of the benefits of construction partnering in Hong Kong , 2003 .

[23]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[24]  Arvind Parkhe,et al.  Building trust in international alliances , 1998 .

[25]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  Controlling Supplier Opportunism in Industrial Relationships , 1996 .

[26]  Roberto Pietroforte,et al.  Communication and governance in the building process , 1997 .

[27]  A. Cox,et al.  ‘Fit for purpose’ contractual relations: determining a theoretical framework for construction projects , 1997 .

[28]  M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Joint risk management through transactionally efficient relational contracting , 2002 .

[29]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  Effective partnering tools in construction: a case study on MTRC TKE contract 604 in Hong Kong , 2004 .

[30]  A. Kadefors.  Trust in project relationships-inside the black box , 2004 .

[31]  T. Das,et al.  Trust, Control, and Risk in Strategic Alliances: An Integrated Framework , 2001 .

[32]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Selecting a suitable procurement method for a building project , 1998 .

[33]  Heng Li,et al.  Construction Partnering Process and Associated Critical Success Factors: Quantitative Investigation , 2002 .

[34]  P. James,et al.  A review of the progress towards the adoption of supply chain management (SCM) relationships in construction , 2002 .

[35]  David J. Edwards,et al.  A rework reduction model for construction projects , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[36]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  Behavioral aspects in construction partnering , 2003 .

[37]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Developing relationships in business networks , 1995 .

[38]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation , 2002 .

[39]  P. Adler.  Market, Hierarchy, and Trust: The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism , 2001 .