Ethnic Networks in FDI and the Impact of Institutional Development

Ethnic Chinese entrepreneurs are known for their active business networking practices, particularly in Southeast Asia. This paper empirically investigates the role of ethnic Chinese networks in promoting foreign direct investment (FDI). We further evaluate whether the effectiveness of networking activities are affected by the level of economic and institutional development of the source and the host countries. Using a standard gravity model, we find that ethnic Chinese networks are significant in facilitating cross-border investment between countries. The strength of ethnic Chinese networks between country pairs, approximated by the product of the numbers of ethnic Chinese in both countries, is positively correlated with the cumulative amount of their reciprocal FDI. More importantly, this significant relationship is not limited to countries in Southeast Asia, but is applicable to other country pairs included in the study as well, regardless of whether the investment is originated from industrial countries or developing economies. Finally, the analysis finds no evidence that ethnic networks are only effective in countries where economic and legal institutions are under-developed. Ethnic Chinese networks have played a significant role in promoting FDI to countries with a relatively higher bureaucratic quality, much more so than to countries with a lower bureaucratic quality.

[1]  James E. Anderson A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation , 1979 .

[2]  James E. Rauch,et al.  Ethnic Chinese Networks in International Trade , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[3]  David Colander,et al.  The Stories We Tell: a Reconsideration of As/ad Analysis , 2022 .

[4]  D. Gould Immigrant Links to the Home Country: Empirical Implications for U.S. Bilateral Trade Flows , 1994 .

[5]  D. Poston,et al.  The global distribution of the overseas Chinese around 1990. , 1994 .

[6]  J. Bergstrand The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade , 1989 .

[7]  S. Wei,et al.  How Taxing is Corruption on International Investors? , 1997, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[8]  A. Safarian,et al.  The complementarity between U.S. foreign direct investment stock and trade , 2001 .

[9]  Gordon Redding,et al.  Overseas Chinese networks: Understanding the enigma , 1995 .

[10]  A. Greif Contract Enforceability and Economic Institutions in Early Trade: the Maghribi Traders' Coalition , 1993 .

[11]  J. Bergstrand The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence , 1985 .

[12]  J. Markusen The Boundaries of Multinational Enterprises and the Theory of International Trade , 1995 .

[13]  James E. Rauch,et al.  Overcoming Informational Barriers to International Resource Allocation: Prices and Group Ties , 1998 .

[14]  J. Williamson,et al.  Were Trade and Factor Mobility Substitutes in History? , 1997 .

[15]  R. Lipsey,et al.  Foreign Production and Exports in Manufacturing Industries , 1981 .

[16]  Jonathan Eaton,et al.  Bilateralism and Regionalism in Japanese and U.S. Trade and Direct Foreign Investment Patterns , 1995 .

[17]  鳥居 泰彦,et al.  世界経済・社会統計 = World development indicators , 1998 .

[18]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  A Simple Theory of International Trade with Multinational Corporations , 1984, Journal of Political Economy.

[19]  Jeffrey A. Frankel,et al.  The Regionalization Of The World Economy , 1997 .

[20]  K. Head,et al.  Overseas Investment and Firm Exports , 2001 .