Managing cognitive load in simulations: exploring the role of simulation technologists

Background Facilitating simulation is a complex task with high cognitive load. Often simulation technologists are recruited to help run scenarios and lower some of the extraneous load. We used cognitive load theory to explore the impact of technologists on instructors, identifying sources of instructor cognitive load with and without technologists present. Methods Data were collected from 56 simulation sessions for postgraduate emergency medicine residents. Instructors delivered 14 of the sessions without a technologist. After each session, the instructor and simulation technologist (if present) provided quantitative and qualitative data on the cognitive load of the simulation. Results Instructors rated their cognitive load similarly, regardless of whether simulation technologists were present. However, the composition of their cognitive load differed. Instructors experienced reduced cognitive load related to the simulator and technical resources when technologists were present. Qualitative feedback from instructors suggested real consequences to these differences in cognitive load in (1) perceived complexities in running the scenario, and (2) observations of learners. Conclusion We provide evidence that simulation technologists can remove some of the extraneous load related to the simulator and technical resources for the instructor, allowing the instructor to focus more on observing the learner(s) and tailoring the scenario to their actions.

[1]  T. Gog,et al.  Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.

[2]  Vincent G. Duffy,et al.  Impact of a simulated accident in virtual training on decision-making performance , 2004 .

[3]  Laura M. Naismith,et al.  Validity of Cognitive Load Measures in Simulation-Based Training: A Systematic Review , 2015, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[4]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory for the Design of Medical Simulations , 2015, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[5]  Irene W. Y. Ma,et al.  Emotion, cognitive load and learning outcomes during simulation training , 2012, Medical education.

[6]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[7]  Mark D. Adler,et al.  Providing effective simulation activities. , 2013 .

[8]  Douglas A Wiegmann,et al.  The Mayo High Performance Teamwork Scale: Reliability and Validity for Evaluating Key Crew Resource Management Skills , 2007, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[9]  Jimmie Leppink,et al.  The evolution of cognitive load theory and its application to medical education , 2015, Perspectives on Medical Education.

[10]  John Q. Young,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: Implications for medical education: AMEE Guide No. 86 , 2014, Medical teacher.

[11]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies , 2010, Medical education.

[12]  D. Altman,et al.  Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method , 1995, BMJ.

[13]  F. Paas,et al.  Measurement of Cognitive Load in Instructional Research , 1994, Perceptual and motor skills.

[14]  Evie McCrum-Gardner,et al.  Which is the correct statistical test to use? , 2008, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[15]  Gary L Geis,et al.  Defining the Simulation Technician Role: Results of a Survey-Based Study , 2015, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[16]  Nanja J. Kolk,et al.  Assessment Center Procedures: Cognitive Load During the Observation Phase , 2002 .

[17]  Lucy Yardley,et al.  Content and thematic analysis , 2003 .

[18]  Klaus G. Melchers,et al.  Do Assessors Have Too Much on Their Plates? The Effects of Simultaneously Rating Multiple Assessment Center Candidates on Rating Quality , 2010 .