Towards brain-robot interfaces in stroke rehabilitation

A neurorehabilitation approach that combines robot-assisted active physical therapy and Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) may provide an additional mileage with respect to traditional rehabilitation methods for patients with severe motor impairment due to cerebrovascular brain damage (e.g., stroke) and other neurological conditions. In this paper, we describe the design and modes of operation of a robot-based rehabilitation framework that enables artificial support of the sensorimotor feedback loop. The aim is to increase cortical plasticity by means of Hebbian-type learning rules. A BCI-based shared-control strategy is used to drive a Barret WAM 7-degree-of-freedom arm that guides a subject's arm. Experimental validation of our setup is carried out both with healthy subjects and stroke patients. We review the empirical results which we have obtained to date, and argue that they support the feasibility of future rehabilitative treatments employing this novel approach.

[1]  Monica A. Perez,et al.  Neural interface technology for rehabilitation: exploiting and promoting neuroplasticity. , 2010, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[2]  Andreas Schulze-Bonhage,et al.  Prediction of arm movement trajectories from ECoG-recordings in humans , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[3]  J R Wolpaw,et al.  Spatial filter selection for EEG-based communication. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  A. Mayr,et al.  Prospective, Blinded, Randomized Crossover Study of Gait Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Using the Lokomat Gait Orthosis , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[5]  T. Murphy,et al.  Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  H. Krebs,et al.  Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[7]  H. C. Dijkerman,et al.  Does motor imagery training improve hand function in chronic stroke patients? A pilot study , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[8]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[9]  H. F. Machiel van der Loos,et al.  Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[10]  A. Atiya,et al.  Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[11]  M. Johnston,et al.  Functional limitations and survival following stroke: Psychological and clinical predictors of 3-year outcome , 2004, International journal of behavioral medicine.

[12]  Lalit Kalra,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation 2009: old chestnuts and new insights. , 2010, Stroke.

[13]  Robert Riener,et al.  ARMin II - 7 DoF rehabilitation robot: mechanics and kinematics , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  N. Hogan,et al.  Overview of clinical trials with MIT-MANUS: a robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation facility. , 1999, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[15]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  A clinical study of motor imagery-based brain-computer interface for upper limb robotic rehabilitation , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[16]  F. Müller,et al.  Effects of Locomotion Training With Assistance of a Robot-Driven Gait Orthosis in Hemiparetic Patients After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study , 2007, Stroke.

[17]  J. Hidler,et al.  Advances in the Understanding and Treatment of Stroke Impairment Using Robotic Devices , 2005, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[18]  W. Garraway,et al.  Proprioception and spatial neglect after stroke. , 1983, Age and ageing.

[19]  Robert Riener,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper extremities , 2005, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[20]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[21]  Moritz Grosse-Wentrup,et al.  Beamforming in Noninvasive Brain–Computer Interfaces , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Think to Move: a Neuromagnetic Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System for Chronic Stroke , 2008, Stroke.

[23]  S. Page,et al.  Mental Practice in Chronic Stroke: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial , 2007, Stroke.

[24]  J. Peters,et al.  Closing the sensorimotor loop: haptic feedback facilitates decoding of motor imagery , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[25]  R. Sacco,et al.  Long-Term Functional Recovery After First Ischemic Stroke: The Northern Manhattan Study , 2009, Stroke.