Computerised Cardiotocography Analysis for the Automated Detection of Fetal Compromise during Labour: A Review

The measurement and analysis of fetal heart rate (FHR) and uterine contraction (UC) patterns, known as cardiotocography (CTG), is a key technology for detecting fetal compromise during labour. This technology is commonly used by clinicians to make decisions on the mode of delivery to minimise adverse outcomes. A range of computerised CTG analysis techniques have been proposed to overcome the limitations of manual clinician interpretation. While these automated techniques can potentially improve patient outcomes, their adoption into clinical practice remains limited. This review provides an overview of current FHR and UC monitoring technologies, public and private CTG datasets, pre-processing steps, and classification algorithms used in automated approaches for fetal compromise detection. It aims to highlight challenges inhibiting the translation of automated CTG analysis methods from research to clinical application and provide recommendations to overcome them.

[1]  P. Abry,et al.  Editorial: Fetal-maternal monitoring in the age of artificial intelligence and computer-aided decision support: A multidisciplinary perspective , 2022, Frontiers in Pediatrics.

[2]  J. Bernardes.  Computerized analysis of cardiotocograms in clinical practice and the SisPorto® system thirty-two years after: technological, physiopathological and clinical studies , 2022, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[3]  Yaosheng Lu,et al.  An attention-based CNN-BiLSTM hybrid neural network enhanced with features of discrete wavelet transformation for fetal acidosis classification , 2021, Expert Syst. Appl..

[4]  J. Westgate,et al.  Physiological control of fetal heart rate variability during labour: implications and controversies , 2021, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  Luísa Castro,et al.  Non-linear Methods Predominant in Fetal Heart Rate Analysis: A Systematic Review , 2021, Frontiers in Medicine.

[6]  W. P. Marnane,et al.  Challenges of Developing Robust AI for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring , 2021, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence.

[7]  Maria Romano,et al.  A Comprehensive Review of Techniques for Processing and Analyzing Fetal Heart Rate Signals , 2021, Sensors.

[8]  Luísa Castro,et al.  Systematic Review of Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Spectral Analysis and an Application in the Detection of Fetal Acidemia , 2021, Frontiers in Pediatrics.

[9]  N. Suzuki,et al.  Accuracy of predicting neonatal distress using a five‐level classification of fetal heart rate monitoring , 2020, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[10]  L. Burattini,et al.  Annotation dataset of the cardiotocographic recordings constituting the “CTU-CHB intra-partum CTG database” , 2020, Data in brief.

[11]  Y. Jacquemyn,et al.  Intrapartum non‐invasive electrophysiological monitoring: A prospective observational study , 2020, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[12]  Yefei Zhang,et al.  DeepFHR: intelligent prediction of fetal Acidemia using fetal heart rate signals based on convolutional neural network , 2019, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[13]  Ivan Jordanov,et al.  Multimodal Convolutional Neural Networks to Detect Fetal Compromise During Labor and Delivery , 2019, IEEE Access.

[14]  Zafar Iqbal,et al.  Fetal Heart Rate Classification and Comparative Analysis Using Cardiotocography Data and Known Classifiers , 2019, International Journal of Grid and Distributed Computing.

[15]  Patrice Abry,et al.  Computer‐based intrapartum fetal monitoring and beyond: A review of the 2nd Workshop on Signal Processing and Monitoring in Labor (October 2017, Oxford, UK) , 2019, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[16]  Onur Avci,et al.  1D Convolutional Neural Networks and Applications: A Survey , 2019, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[17]  J. Balayla,et al.  Use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the interpretation of intrapartum fetal heart rate (FHR) tracings: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2019, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[18]  Ninon Burgos,et al.  Convolutional Neural Networks for Classification of Alzheimer's Disease: Overview and Reproducible Evaluation , 2019, Medical Image Anal..

[19]  Jianqiang Li,et al.  Automatic Classification of Fetal Heart Rate Based on Convolutional Neural Network , 2019, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[20]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Computer-Aided Diagnosis System of Fetal Hypoxia Incorporating Recurrence Plot With Convolutional Neural Network , 2019, Front. Physiol..

[21]  G. Magenes,et al.  Intrapartum cardiotocography with and without computer analysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2018, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[22]  Yang Zhang,et al.  A Comprehensive Feature Analysis of the Fetal Heart Rate Signal for the Intelligent Assessment of Fetal State , 2018, Journal of clinical medicine.

[23]  Zafer Cömert,et al.  Prognostic model based on image-based time-frequency features and genetic algorithm for fetal hypoxia assessment , 2018, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[24]  Zafer Cömert,et al.  Open-access software for analysis of fetal heart rate signals , 2018, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[25]  M. Palaniswami,et al.  The effects of asymmetric volume conductor modeling on non-invasive fetal ECG extraction , 2018, Physiological measurement.

[26]  D. Ayres-de-Campos.  Electronic fetal monitoring or cardiotocography, 50 years later: what's in a name? , 2018, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[27]  Nelly Pustelnik,et al.  Sparse learning for Intrapartum fetal heart rate analysis , 2018 .

[28]  W. Cohen.  Clinical assessment of uterine contractions , 2017, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[29]  Zafer Cömert,et al.  Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques for Fetal Heart Rate Classification , 2017 .

[30]  K. Bhogal.  Focus on cardiotocography: Intrapartum monitoring of uterine contractions , 2017 .

[31]  H. Sameshima,et al.  Hypoxia: Animal experiments and clinical implications , 2017, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[32]  C. Stylios,et al.  Investigating pH based evaluation of fetal heart rate (FHR) recordings , 2017, Health and technology.

[33]  Antoniya Georgieva,et al.  Computerized data‐driven interpretation of the intrapartum cardiotocogram: a cohort study , 2017, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[34]  R. Martínek,et al.  Is Abdominal Fetal Electrocardiography an Alternative to Doppler Ultrasound for FHR Variability Evaluation? , 2017, Front. Physiol..

[35]  Patrice Abry,et al.  Sparse Support Vector Machine for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Classification , 2017, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[36]  Christopher Mabey,et al.  Computerised interpretation of fetal heart rate during labour (INFANT): a randomised controlled trial , 2017, The Lancet.

[37]  Shalom Darmanjian,et al.  Monitoring Fetal Heart Rate during Labor: A Comparison of Three Methods , 2017, Journal of pregnancy.

[38]  João Bernardes,et al.  SisPorto 4.0 – computer analysis following the 2015 FIGO Guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring , 2017, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[39]  Zafer Cömert,et al.  Evaluation of Fetal Distress Diagnosis during Delivery Stages based on Linear and Nonlinear Features of Fetal Heart Rate for Neural Network Community , 2016 .

[40]  E. Mcclure,et al.  Stillbirths: The Hidden Birth Asphyxia - US and Global Perspectives. , 2016, Clinics in perinatology.

[41]  J. Westgate,et al.  The myths and physiology surrounding intrapartum decelerations: the critical role of the peripheral chemoreflex , 2016, The Journal of physiology.

[42]  G. Riet,et al.  Prediction models in obstetrics: understanding the treatment paradox and potential solutions to the threat it poses , 2016, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[43]  Gari D Clifford,et al.  A practical guide to non-invasive foetal electrocardiogram extraction and analysis , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[44]  D. Ayres-de-Campos,et al.  FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Physiology of fetal oxygenation and the main goals of intrapartum fetal monitoring , 2015, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[45]  D. Ayres-de-Campos,et al.  FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography , 2015, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[46]  Lenka Lhotská,et al.  Agreement on intrapartum cardiotocogram recordings between expert obstetricians. , 2015, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[47]  L. Burattini,et al.  Noninvasive Fetal Electrocardiography: An Overview of the Signal Electrophysiological Meaning, Recording Procedures, and Processing Techniques , 2015, Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc.

[48]  Petar M. Djuric,et al.  Fetal Heart Rate Classification Using Generative Models , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[49]  Barrie Hayes-Gill,et al.  Influence of maternal body mass index on accuracy and reliability of external fetal monitoring techniques , 2014, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[50]  S J Payne,et al.  Phase‐rectified signal averaging for intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring is related to acidaemia at birth , 2014, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[51]  Jai K Das,et al.  Can available interventions end preventable deaths in mothers, newborn babies, and stillbirths, and at what cost? , 2014, The Lancet.

[52]  R. Mori,et al.  Maternal complications and perinatal mortality: findings of the World Health Organization Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health , 2014, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[53]  Lenka Lhotská,et al.  Open access intrapartum CTG database , 2014, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[54]  Austin Ugwumadu,et al.  Understanding cardiotocographic patterns associated with intrapartum fetal hypoxia and neurologic injury. , 2013, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[55]  Antoniya Georgieva,et al.  Umbilical cord gases in relation to the neonatal condition: the EveREst plot. , 2013, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[56]  Shalom Darmanjian,et al.  Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods. , 2012, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[57]  B. Hayes-Gill,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of fetal heart rate monitoring using maternal abdominal surface electrodes , 2012, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[58]  Lenka Lhotská,et al.  Using nonlinear features for fetal heart rate classification , 2012, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[59]  B. Hayes-Gill,et al.  Intrapartum signal quality with external fetal heart rate monitoring: a two way trial of external Doppler CTG ultrasound and the abdominal fetal electrocardiogram , 2012, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[60]  L Lhotská,et al.  Automatic evaluation of intrapartum fetal heart rate recordings: a comprehensive analysis of useful features , 2011, Physiological measurement.

[61]  Edmond Zahedi,et al.  Antepartum fetal heart rate feature extraction and classification using empirical mode decomposition and support vector machine , 2011, Biomedical engineering online.

[62]  R. Morris,et al.  Strength of association between umbilical cord pH and perinatal and long term outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[63]  J. Lawn,et al.  Two million intrapartum‐related stillbirths and neonatal deaths: Where, why, and what can be done? , 2009, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[64]  Haibo He,et al.  Learning from Imbalanced Data , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[65]  A. Gunn,et al.  The fetal heart rate response to hypoxia: insights from animal models. , 2009, Clinics in perinatology.

[66]  B. N. Krupa,et al.  The application of empirical mode decomposition for the enhancement of cardiotocograph signals , 2009, Physiological measurement.

[67]  Everett F. Magann,et al.  Intrapartum nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing and prediction of adverse outcomes: interobserver variability. , 2008, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[68]  R. Freeman,et al.  Signal ambiguity resulting in unexpected outcome with external fetal heart rate monitoring. , 2008, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[69]  P. Steer.  Has electronic fetal heart rate monitoring made a difference. , 2008, Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine.

[70]  B. Mol,et al.  Fetal complications after placement of an intrauterine pressure catheter: A report of two cases and review of the literature , 2008, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[71]  H. V. van Geijn,et al.  Uterine activity monitoring during labor , 2007, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[72]  B. Stenson,et al.  Use of umbilical cord blood gas analysis in the assessment of the newborn , 2007, Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition.

[73]  Ana Paula Rocha,et al.  Linear and nonlinear analysis of heart rate patterns associated with fetal behavioral states in the antepartum period. , 2007, Early human development.

[74]  Dorothee E. Marossero,et al.  Monitoring Contractions in Obese Parturients: Electrohysterography Compared With Traditional Monitoring , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[75]  Ana Paula Rocha,et al.  Linear and nonlinear fetal heart rate analysis of normal and acidemic fetuses in the minutes preceding delivery , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[76]  Chrysostomos D. Stylios,et al.  Predicting the risk of metabolic acidosis for newborns based on fetal heart rate signal classification using support vector machines , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[77]  D. Devane,et al.  Midwives' visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement. , 2005, Journal of advanced nursing.

[78]  J. Wayenberg.  Threshold of metabolic acidosis associated with neonatal encephalopathy in the term newborn , 2005, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[79]  H. V. van Geijn,et al.  The quality of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. , 2004, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[80]  Sergio Cerutti,et al.  Linear and nonlinear parameters for the analysisof fetal heart rate signal from cardiotocographic recordings , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[81]  A. Majnemer,et al.  Topical Review: Long-Term Developmental Outcome of Asphyxiated Term Neonates , 2001, Journal of child neurology.

[82]  L Tarassenko,et al.  Tracking poles with an autoregressive model: a confidence index for the analysis of the intrapartum cardiotocogram. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[83]  K. Leveno,et al.  The continuing value of the Apgar score for the assessment of newborn infants. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[84]  D. Ayres-de- Campos,et al.  SisPorto 2.0: a program for automated analysis of cardiotocograms. , 2000, The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine.

[85]  J. Richman,et al.  Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[86]  J. Low,et al.  Intrapartum fetal asphyxia: definition, diagnosis, and classification. , 1997, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[87]  Z. J. Yang,et al.  The prediction of fetal acidosis at birth by computerised analysis of intrapartum cardiotocography , 1995, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[88]  R D Keith,et al.  Development, evaluation and validation of an intelligent system for the management of labour. , 1994, Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology.

[89]  M C Carter,et al.  Signal processing and display—cardiotocographs , 1993, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[90]  G S Dawes,et al.  The influence of signal loss on the comparison between computer analyses of the fetal heart rate in labour using pulsed Doppler ultrasound (with autocorrelation) and simultaneous scalp electrocardiogram. , 1987, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[91]  M. Nageotte.  Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring , 1981 .

[92]  Venkat N. Gudivada,et al.  Data Quality Considerations for Big Data and Machine Learning: Going Beyond Data Cleaning and Transformations , 2017 .

[93]  João Bernardes,et al.  Central Fetal Monitoring With and Without Computer Analysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2017, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[94]  E. Chandraharan,et al.  Continuous cardiotocography during labour: Analysis, classification and management. , 2016, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[95]  Constantinos S. Pattichis,et al.  XIV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2016 , 2016 .

[96]  Konstantinos Blekas,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: Methods and Applications , 2014, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[97]  E. Declercq,et al.  Major Survey Findings of Listening to Mothers(SM) III: Pregnancy and Birth: Report of the Third National U.S. Survey of Women's Childbearing Experiences. , 2014, The Journal of perinatal education.

[98]  Gerhard Goos,et al.  Information Technology in Bio- and Medical Informatics , 2013, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[99]  Z. Alfirevic,et al.  Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[100]  M. Moulden,et al.  Artificial neural networks applied to fetal monitoring in labour , 2011, Neural Computing and Applications.

[101]  Diogo Ayres-de-Campos,et al.  Omniview-SisPorto 3.5 - a central fetal monitoring station with online alerts based on computerized cardiotocogram+ST event analysis. , 2008, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[102]  Chrysostomos D. Stylios,et al.  CLASSIFICATION OF FETAL HEART RATE USING SCALE DEPENDENT FEATURES AND SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES , 2005 .

[103]  G S Dawes,et al.  System 8000: Computerized antenatal FHR analysis , 1991, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[104]  J. P. Marques de Sá,et al.  The Porto system for automated cardiotocographic signal analysis , 1991, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[105]  P. Wood,et al.  Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring , 1989, Macmillan Education UK.

[106]  M Y Divon,et al.  Autocorrelation techniques in fetal monitoring. , 1985, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.