Dynamics of neurons controlling movements of a locust hind leg. III. Extensor tibiae motor neurons.

Imposed movements of the apodeme of the femoral chordotonal organ (FeCO) of the locust hind leg elicit resistance reflexes in extensor and flexor tibiae motor neurons. The synaptic responses of the fast and slow extensor tibiae motor neurons (FETi and SETi, respectively) and the spike responses of SETi were analyzed with the use of the Wiener kernel white noise method to determine their response properties. The first-order Wiener kernels computed from soma recordings were essentially monophasic, or low passed, indicating that the motor neurons were primarily sensitive to the position of the tibia about the femorotibial joint. The responses of both extensor motor neurons had large nonlinear components. The second-order kernels of the synaptic responses of FETi and SETi had large on-diagonal peaks with two small off-diagonal valleys. That of SETi had an additional elongated valley on the diagonal, which was accompanied by two off-diagonal depolarizing peaks at a cutoff frequency of 58 Hz. These second-order components represent a half-wave rectification of the position-sensitive depolarizing response in FETi and SETi, and a delayed inhibitory input to SETi, indicating that both motor neurons were directionally sensitive. Model predictions of the responses of the motor neurons showed that the first-order (linear) characterization poorly predicted the actual responses of FETi and SETi to FeCO stimulation, whereas the addition of the second-order (nonlinear) term markedly improved the performance of the model. Simultaneous recordings from the soma and a neuropilar process of FETi showed that its synaptic responses to FeCO stimulation were phase delayed by about -30 degrees at 20 Hz, and reduced in amplitude by 30-40% when recorded in the soma. Similar configurations of the first and second-order kernels indicated that the primary process of FETi acted as a low-pass filter. Cross-correlation between a white noise stimulus and a unitized spike discharge of SETi again produced well-defined first- and second-order kernels that showed that the SETi spike response was also dependent on positional inputs. An elongated negative valley on the diagonal, characteristic of the second-order kernel of the synaptic response in SETi, was absent in the kernel from the spike component, suggesting that information is lost in the spike production process. The functional significance of these results is discussed in relation to the behavior of the locust.

[1]  Discharge patterns of swimmeret motoneurones in the lobster, simulated with a digital computer. , 1969, The Journal of experimental biology.

[2]  S. Zill,et al.  Plasticity and proprioception in insects. I. Responses and cellular properties of individual receptors of the locust metathoracic femoral chordotonal organ. , 1985, The Journal of experimental biology.

[3]  Differences in the responsiveness of identified motoneurons in the cockroach: role in the motor program for stepping , 1979, Brain Research.

[4]  B. Bush Proprioceptive reflexes in the legs of Carcinus maenas (L.). , 1962, The Journal of experimental biology.

[5]  M. Burrows The control of sets of motoneurones by local interneurones in the locust. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  U. Bässler,et al.  Motor neurones of the flexor tibiae muscle in phasmids , 1989 .

[7]  Richard B. Stein,et al.  What muscle variable(s) does the nervous system control in limb movements? , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  Zeynep Erim,et al.  Common drive of motor units in regulation of muscle force , 1994, Trends in Neurosciences.

[9]  Christine E. Phillips,et al.  An Arthropod Muscle Innervated by Nine Excitatory Motor Neurones , 1980 .

[10]  G. Laurent,et al.  Distribution of intersegmental inputs to nonspiking local interneurons and motor neurons in the locust , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  M. Burrows,et al.  Spiking local interneurons mediate local reflexes. , 1982, Science.

[12]  P. L. Newland,et al.  Dynamics of neurons controlling movements of a locust hind leg: Wiener kernel analysis of the responses of proprioceptive afferents. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  A. Büschges,et al.  Nonspiking local interneurons in insect leg motor control. I. Common layout and species-specific response properties of femur-tibia joint control pathways in stick insect and locust. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  M. Burrows Inhibitory interactions between spiking and nonspiking local interneurons in the locust , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  Y. Kondoh,et al.  Neural computation of motion in the fly visual system: quadratic nonlinearity of responses induced by picrotoxin in the HS and CH cells. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  K Naka,et al.  Signal transmission in the catfish retina. I. Transmission in the outer retina. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  P. Matthews,et al.  Mammalian muscle receptors and their central actions , 1974 .

[18]  U. Bässler The femur-tibia control system of stick insects — a model system for the study of the neural basis of joint control , 1993, Brain Research Reviews.

[19]  U. Bässler,et al.  Responses of flexor motor neurones to stimulation of the femoral chordotonal organ of the plasmid Extatosoma tiaratum , 1990 .

[20]  Vasilis Z. Marmarelis,et al.  Analysis of Physiological Systems , 1978, Computers in Biology and Medicine.

[21]  Field,et al.  THE POSITION-DEPENDENT NATURE OF POSTURAL RESISTANCE REFLEXES IN THE LOCUST , 1994, The Journal of experimental biology.

[22]  U. Bssler,et al.  The neural basis of catalepsy in the stick insect cuniculina impigra: 3. Characteristics of the Extensor Motor Neurons , 1983 .

[23]  H. Cruse Which Parameters Control the Leg Movement of a Walking Insect?: I. Velocity Control during the Stance Phase , 1985 .

[24]  M. Burrows,et al.  Reflex Effects of the Femoral Chordotonal Organ Upon Leg Motor Neurones of the Locust , 1982 .

[25]  S. Zill Plasticity and proprioception in insects. II. Modes of reflex action of the locust metathoracic femoral chordotonal organ. , 1985, The Journal of experimental biology.

[26]  W. Davis,et al.  The neural control of swimmeret beating in the lobster. , 1969, The Journal of experimental biology.

[27]  M. Siegler Posture and history of movement determine membrane potential and synaptic events in nonspiking interneurons and motor neurons of the locust. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Vasilis Z. Marmarelis,et al.  Analysis of Physiological Signals , 1978 .

[29]  M. Burrows Parallel processing of proprioceptive signals by spiking local interneurons and motor neurons in the locust , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[30]  K Naka,et al.  Signal transmission in the catfish retina. II. Transmission to type-N cell. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  M. Burrows Local circuits for the control of leg movements in an insect , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[32]  P. Usherwood,et al.  Structure and Physiology of a Chordotonal Organ in the Locust Leg , 1968 .

[33]  U. Bässler,et al.  Physiology of the Femoral Chordotonal Organ in the Stick Insect, Cuniculina Impigra , 1985 .

[34]  M. Burrows,et al.  A presynaptic gain control mechanism among sensory neurons of a locust leg proprioceptor , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[35]  U. T. Koch,et al.  Acceleration Receptors in the Femoral Chordotonal Organ of the Stick Insect, Cuniculina Impigra , 1985 .

[36]  H. Cruse,et al.  Evidence for the control of velocity as well as position in leg protraction and retraction by the stick insect , 1986 .

[37]  W. Davis,et al.  Functional significance of motorneuron size and soma position in swimmeret system of the lobster. , 1971, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  G. Laurent,et al.  Proprioceptive inputs to nonspiking local interneurons contribute to local reflexes of a locust hindleg , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[39]  Y. W. Lee,et al.  Measurement of the Wiener Kernels of a Non-linear System by Cross-correlation† , 1965 .

[40]  K. Naka,et al.  White-Noise Analysis of a Neuron Chain: An Application of the Wiener Theory , 1972, Science.

[41]  H. Cruse Which parameters control the leg movement of a walking insect? II: The start of the swing phase , 1985 .

[42]  BÜSchges,et al.  Correlation between muscle structure and filter characteristics of the muscle-joint system in three orthopteran insect species , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[43]  Professor Dr. Ulrich Bässler Neural Basis of Elementary Behavior in Stick Insects , 1983, Studies of Brain Function.

[44]  D. Brunn,et al.  Physiological and Ultrastructural Characterization of a Central Synaptic Connection between Identified Motor Neurons in the Locust , 1989, The European journal of neuroscience.

[45]  U. Bässler,et al.  Assisting components within a resistance reflex of the stick insect, Cuniculina impigra , 1986 .

[46]  G. Laurent,et al.  Synaptic potentials in the central terminals of locust proprioceptive afferents generated by other afferents from the same sense organ , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[47]  Bässler,et al.  Contributions of structure and innervation pattern of the stick insect extensor tibiae muscle to the filter characteristics of the muscle-joint system , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[48]  K. Naka,et al.  Dynamics of the ganglion cell response in the catfish and frog retinas , 1987, The Journal of general physiology.