Atomic-level insights into metabolite recognition and specificity of the SAM-II riboswitch.

Although S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH), a metabolic by-product of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), differs from SAM only by a single methyl group and an overall positive charge, SAH binds the SAM-II riboswitch with more than 1000-fold less affinity than SAM. Using atomistic molecular dynamics simulations, we investigated the molecular basis of such high selectivity in ligand recognition by SAM-II riboswitch. The biosynthesis of SAM exclusively generates the (S,S) stereoisomer, and (S,S)-SAM can spontaneously convert to the (R,S) form. We, therefore, also examined the effects of (R,S)-SAM binding to SAM-II and its potential biological function. We find that the unfavorable loss in entropy in SAM-II binding is greater for (S,S)- and (R,S)-SAM than SAH, which is compensated by stabilizing electrostatic interactions with the riboswitch. The positively charged sulfonium moiety on SAM acts as the crucial anchor point responsible for the formation of key ionic interactions as it fits favorably in the negatively charged binding pocket. In contrast, SAH, with its lone pair of electrons on the sulfur, experiences repulsion in the binding pocket of SAM-II and is enthalpically destabilized. In the presence of SAH, similar to the unbound riboswitch, the pseudoknot structure of SAM-II is not completely formed, thus exposing the Shine-Dalgarno sequence. Unlike SAM, this may further facilitate ribosomal assembly and translation initiation. Our analysis of the conformational ensemble sampled by SAM-II in the absence of ligands and when bound to SAM or SAH reveals that ligand binding follows a combination of conformational selection and induced-fit mechanisms.

[1]  P. Kollman,et al.  A well-behaved electrostatic potential-based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic char , 1993 .

[2]  Andrea Haller,et al.  Conformational capture of the SAM-II riboswitch. , 2011, Nature chemical biology.

[3]  E. Nudler,et al.  The riboswitch control of bacterial metabolism. , 2004, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[4]  R. Breaker,et al.  Riboswitches that sense S-adenosylhomocysteine and activate genes involved in coenzyme recycling. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[5]  R. Breaker,et al.  Molecular-recognition characteristics of SAM-binding riboswitches. , 2006, Angewandte Chemie.

[6]  T. Henkin,et al.  The S box regulon: a new global transcription termination control system for methionine and cysteine biosynthesis genes in Gram‐positive bacteria , 1998, Molecular microbiology.

[7]  G. Soukup,et al.  Riboswitches exert genetic control through metabolite-induced conformational change. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.

[8]  R. Montange,et al.  Discrimination between closely related cellular metabolites by the SAM-I riboswitch. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[10]  Ali Nahvi,et al.  Genetic control by a metabolite binding mRNA. , 2002, Chemistry & biology.

[11]  R. Breaker,et al.  Regulation of bacterial gene expression by riboswitches. , 2005, Annual review of microbiology.

[12]  R. Breaker,et al.  Genetic Control by Metabolite‐Binding Riboswitches , 2003, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[13]  G. Cantoni,et al.  THE NATURE OF THE ACTIVE METHYL DONOR FORMED ENZYMATICALLY FROM L-METHIONINE AND ADENOSINETRIPHOSPHATE1,2 , 1952 .

[14]  I. Jolliffe Principal Component Analysis , 2002 .

[15]  R. Batey,et al.  Structure of the SAM-II riboswitch bound to S-adenosylmethionine , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[16]  Zasha Weinberg,et al.  The aptamer core of SAM-IV riboswitches mimics the ligand-binding site of SAM-I riboswitches. , 2008, RNA.

[17]  R. Borchardt,et al.  Chiral instability at sulfur of S-adenosylmethionine. , 1983, Biochemistry.

[18]  Jeffrey E. Barrick,et al.  Evidence for a second class of S-adenosylmethionine riboswitches and other regulatory RNA motifs in alpha-proteobacteria , 2005, Genome Biology.

[19]  A. Serganov,et al.  Structured mRNAs Regulate Translation Initiation by Binding to the Platform of the Ribosome , 2007, Cell.

[20]  R. Breaker,et al.  Gene regulation by riboswitches , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[21]  T. Henkin,et al.  The SMK box is a new SAM-binding RNA for translational regulation of SAM synthetase , 2006, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[22]  G. Haba,et al.  S-Adenosylmethionine: The Relation of Configuration at the Sulfonium Center to Enzymatic Reactivity1 , 1959 .

[23]  R. Breaker,et al.  A variant riboswitch aptamer class for S-adenosylmethionine common in marine bacteria. , 2009, RNA.

[24]  T. Darden,et al.  A smooth particle mesh Ewald method , 1995 .

[25]  E. Westhof,et al.  Geometric nomenclature and classification of RNA base pairs. , 2001, RNA.

[26]  M. Fontecave,et al.  S-adenosylmethionine: nothing goes to waste. , 2004, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[27]  P. Michiels,et al.  Targeting RNA: new opportunities to address drugless targets. , 2003, Drug discovery today.

[28]  R. Montange,et al.  Structure of the S-adenosylmethionine riboswitch regulatory mRNA element , 2006, Nature.

[29]  T. Henkin,et al.  Transcription termination control of the S box system: Direct measurement of S-adenosylmethionine by the leader RNA , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[31]  Katherine E Deigan,et al.  Riboswitches: discovery of drugs that target bacterial gene-regulatory RNAs. , 2011, Accounts of chemical research.

[32]  P. Kollman,et al.  A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5179−5197 , 1996 .

[33]  Daniel Svozil,et al.  Refinement of the AMBER force field for nucleic acids: improving the description of alpha/gamma conformers. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[34]  Ali Nahvi,et al.  An mRNA structure that controls gene expression by binding S-adenosylmethionine , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[35]  P. Ueland Pharmacological and biochemical aspects of S-adenosylhomocysteine and S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase. , 1982, Pharmacological reviews.

[36]  R. Breaker,et al.  Riboswitches that sense S-adenosylmethionine and S-adenosylhomocysteine. , 2008, Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire.

[37]  Vitaly Epshtein,et al.  The riboswitch-mediated control of sulfur metabolism in bacteria , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Donald Hamelberg,et al.  Atomistic basis for the on–off signaling mechanism in SAM-II riboswitch , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[39]  Jeffrey E. Barrick,et al.  The distributions, mechanisms, and structures of metabolite-binding riboswitches , 2007, Genome Biology.

[40]  C. Abell,et al.  A fragment-based approach to identifying ligands for riboswitches. , 2010, ACS chemical biology.

[41]  A. R. Srinivasan,et al.  Quasi‐harmonic method for studying very low frequency modes in proteins , 1984, Biopolymers.