Parallel and serial task processing in the PRP paradigm: a drift–diffusion model approach
暂无分享,去创建一个
Robert Gaschler | Hilde Haider | André Mattes | Felice Tavera | Anja Ophey | Mandy Roheger | H. Haider | R. Gaschler | André Mattes | M. Roheger | Felice Tavera | A. Ophey
[1] Wilfried Kunde,et al. Action-effect codes in and before the central bottleneck: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[2] Wolfgang Prinz,et al. Modes of Linkage Between Perception and Action , 1984 .
[3] Richard Schweickert,et al. A critical path generalization of the additive factor method: Analysis of a stroop task , 1978 .
[4] Torsten Schubert,et al. Response activation in overlapping tasks and the response-selection bottleneck. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[5] R. D. Gordon,et al. Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. , 2001, Psychological review.
[6] D. Allport,et al. On the Division of Attention: A Disproof of the Single Channel Hypothesis , 1972, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[7] J. C. Johnston,et al. Chronometric Evidence for Central Postponement in Temporally Overlapping Tasks , 2003 .
[8] A. Kristofferson,et al. The timing of interresponse intervals , 1973 .
[9] P. Jolicoeur,et al. A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[10] R. Kliegl,et al. Timing, sequencing, and executive control in repetitive movement production. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[11] Mariano Sigman,et al. A shared cortical bottleneck underlying Attentional Blink and Psychological Refractory Period , 2012, NeuroImage.
[12] D. Rubin,et al. Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .
[13] S. Los,et al. Dissociative patterns of foreperiod effects in temporal discrimination and reaction time tasks , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[14] Anthony N. Carlsen,et al. Evidence for a response preparation bottleneck during dual-task performance: effect of a startling acoustic stimulus on the psychological refractory period. , 2013, Acta psychologica.
[15] Roger Ratcliff,et al. The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.
[16] A. Kristofferson,et al. Response delays and the timing of discrete motor responses , 1973 .
[17] Armin Stock,et al. A short history of ideo-motor action , 2004, Psychological research.
[18] A. Voss,et al. Diffusion models in experimental psychology: a practical introduction. , 2013, Experimental psychology.
[19] Rolf Ulrich,et al. The locus of temporal preparation effects: Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[20] E. Ruthruff,et al. On the nonautomaticity of visual word processing: electrophysiological evidence that word processing requires central attention. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[21] Ritske de Jong,et al. THE ROLE OF PREPARATION IN OVERLAPPING-TASK PERFORMANCE , 1995 .
[22] R W Proctor,et al. Multiple spatial correspondence effects on dual-task performance. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[23] E. Hazeltine,et al. Do small dual-task costs reflect ideomotor compatibility or the absence of crosstalk? , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[24] S. Eickhoff,et al. When Specific Action Biases Meet Nonspecific Preparation: Event Repetition Modulates the Variable-Foreperiod Effect , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[25] D A Rosenbaum,et al. Timing and reaction time. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[26] Andrea Kiesel,et al. Anticipation of Time Spans: New Data from the Foreperiod Paradigm and the Adaptation of a Computational Model , 2009, ABiALS.
[27] Bernhard Hommel,et al. Control of stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance , 2002, Psychological research.
[28] Roy Luria,et al. Online order control in the psychological refractory period paradigm. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[29] E. Hazeltine,et al. Investigating perfect timesharing: the relationship between IM-compatible tasks and dual-task performance. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[30] Victor Mittelstädt,et al. Separating Limits on Preparation Versus Online Processing in Multitasking Paradigms: Evidence for Resource Models , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[31] D. Navon,et al. Queuing or Sharing? A Critical Evaluation of the Single-Bottleneck Notion , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.
[32] Andrea Kiesel,et al. Cognitive Structure, Flexibility, and Plasticity in Human Multitasking—An Integrative Review of Dual-Task and Task-Switching Research , 2018, Psychological bulletin.
[33] Andreas Voss,et al. Experimental validation of the diffusion model based on a slow response time paradigm , 2019, Psychological research.
[34] Leon M. Solomons,et al. Normal motor automatism. , 1896 .
[35] Marco Steinhauser,et al. Serial or parallel processing in dual tasks: what is more effortful? , 2009, Psychophysiology.
[36] Harold Pashler,et al. Effects of practice on task architecture: Combined evidence from interference experiments and random-walk models of decision making , 2011, Cognition.
[37] Rico Fischer,et al. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning , Memory , and Cognition Context-Sensitive Adjustment of Cognitive Control in Dual-Task Performance , 2013 .
[38] B. Hommel. Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[39] Rico Fischer,et al. Predicting high levels of multitasking reduces between-tasks interactions. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[40] Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al. Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions , 1998 .
[41] C. W. Telford. The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses , 1931 .
[42] Markus Janczyk,et al. Why free choices take longer than forced choices: evidence from response threshold manipulations , 2018, Psychological research.
[43] Tilo Strobach,et al. Mechanisms of Practice-Related Reductions of Dual-Task Interference with Simple Tasks: Data and Theory , 2017, Advances in cognitive psychology.
[44] Wilfried Kunde,et al. Who is talking in backward crosstalk? Disentangling response- from goal-conflict in dual-task performance , 2014, Cognition.
[45] Jennifer M. Glass,et al. Virtually Perfect Time Sharing in Dual-Task Performance: Uncorking the Central Cognitive Bottleneck , 2001, Psychological science.
[46] H. Pashler. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.
[47] R. Näätänen,et al. Foreperiod and simple reaction time. , 1981 .
[48] R. Proctor,et al. Task switching and response correspondence in the psychological refractory period paradigm. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[49] Torsten Schubert,et al. Transferability of Dual-Task Coordination Skills after Practice with Changing Component Tasks , 2017, Front. Psychol..
[50] G D Logan,et al. Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[51] David Richardson,et al. Markov chain Monte Carlo: an introduction for epidemiologists. , 2013, International journal of epidemiology.
[52] H. Pashler. The Psychology of Attention , 1997 .
[53] Torsten Schubert,et al. Practice-related reduction of dual-task costs under conditions of a manual-pedal response combination , 2011 .
[54] Daniel Bratzke,et al. Temporal discrimination of one’s own reaction times in dual-task performance: Context effects and methodological constraints , 2016, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
[55] Rolf Ulrich,et al. Formation and representation of temporal reference information , 2016, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.
[56] R. B. Freeman,et al. Cognition and Motor Processes , 1983 .
[57] Markus Janczyk,et al. Two types of backward crosstalk: Sequential modulations and evidence from the diffusion model. , 2019, Acta psychologica.
[58] Jeff Miller,et al. Are model parameters linked to processing stages? An empirical investigation for the ex-Gaussian, ex-Wald, and EZ diffusion models , 2019, Psychological Research.
[59] Thomas V. Wiecki,et al. HDDM: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the Drift-Diffusion Model in Python , 2013, Front. Neuroinform..
[60] Markus Janczyk,et al. A Diffusion Model Analysis of the Response-Effect Compatibility Effect , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[61] Ronald Hübner,et al. Strategic capacity sharing between two tasks: evidence from tasks with the same and with different task sets , 2009, Psychological research.
[62] Andreas Voss,et al. Assessing cognitive processes with diffusion model analyses: a tutorial based on fast-dm-30 , 2015, Front. Psychol..
[63] Torsten Schubert,et al. Practice-related optimization and transfer of executive functions: a general review and a specific realization of their mechanisms in dual tasks , 2014, Psychological Research.
[64] J. C. Johnston,et al. Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent? , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[65] Eva Röttger,et al. Investigating the characteristics of “not responding”: backward crosstalk in the PRP paradigm with forced vs. free no-go decisions , 2017, Psychological research.
[66] Scott Watter,et al. PRP training shows Task1 response selection is the locus of the backward response compatibility effect , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[67] H. Pashler,et al. Graded capacity-sharing in dual-task interference? , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[68] Asher Cohen,et al. Involuntary strategy-dependent dual task performance , 2011, Psychological research.
[69] Rico Fischer,et al. Efficient multitasking: parallel versus serial processing of multiple tasks , 2015, Front. Psychol..
[70] Eric Ruthruff,et al. How strategic is the central bottleneck: can it be overcome by trying harder? , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[71] J. A. Adams,et al. Anticipatory timing of continuous and discrete responses. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.
[72] Wouter Kruijne,et al. Hazard Versus History: Temporal Preparation Is Driven by Past Experience , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[73] Jeff Miller,et al. Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies , 2006, Psychological research.
[74] Rolf Ulrich,et al. On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.