Frog Prey Capture Behavior: Between Sensory Maps and Directed Motor Output

In frog prey capture behavior an appropriate sensory stimulus at a given location in space triggers a complex movement directed toward the stimulus. We are interested in how the frog brain is organized so as to yield such a spatial correspondence between a stimulus and the resulting movement. Initial stages of the neuronal circuitry underlying prey capture appear to involve topographic sensory representations in the midbrain. The prey capture outputs are triggered or ballistic, suggesting that they are based on pattern generating circuitry at some unknown location in the brain. Given these considerations, one approach to the problem of the spatial correspondence between stimulus and movement is to ask how topographic sensory maps are linked to pattern generating circuitry. In this paper we will discuss several experiments directed at exploring this linkage. We will focus particularly on how our ideas about the organization which brings about an appropriate correspondence between input and output have evolved during the course of these studies.

[1]  Control of Crayfish Escape Behavior , 1977 .

[2]  D. Ingle,et al.  Two Visual Systems in the Frog , 1973, Science.

[3]  M. Sanders Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[4]  B Cohen,et al.  Brainstem mechanisms for rapid and slow eye movements. , 1978, Annual review of physiology.

[5]  O. Grüsser,et al.  Neuronal Mechanisms of Visual Movement Perception and Some Psychophysical and Behavioral Correlations , 1973 .

[6]  G. Hoyle,et al.  Identified Neurons and Behavior of Arthropods , 1977, Springer US.

[7]  Paul Grobstein,et al.  Prey acquisition in atectal frogs , 1978, Brain Research.

[8]  K. Fite The visual fields of the frog and toad: a comparative study. , 1973, Behavioral biology.

[9]  O. I. Fukson,et al.  The spinal frog takes into account the scheme of its body during the wiping reflex. , 1980, Science.

[10]  Paul Grobstein,et al.  Visual orienting deficits in frogs with various unilateral lesions , 1982, Behavioural Brain Research.

[11]  D. Ingle,et al.  Visuomotor functions of the frog optic tectum. , 1970, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[12]  Roger W. Sperry,et al.  OPTIC NERVE REGENERATION WITH RETURN OF VISION IN ANURANS , 1944 .

[13]  P. Grobstein,et al.  The potential binocular field and its tectal representation in rana pipiens , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  K. Fite,et al.  Single-unit analysis of binocular neurons in the frog optic tectum. , 1969, Experimental neurology.

[15]  K. Fite,et al.  A retinotopic analysis of the central connections of the optic nerve in the frog , 1974, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  R. Sperry,et al.  Orderly patterning of synaptic associations in regeneration of intracentral fiber tracts mediating visuomotor coordination , 1948, The Anatomical record.