Scales of heterogeneity of water quality in rivers: Insights from high resolution maps based on integrated geospatial, sensor and ROV technologies.

Abstract While the spatial heterogeneity of many aquatic ecosystems is acknowledged, rivers are often mistakenly described as homogenous and well-mixed. The collection and visualization of attributes like water quality is key to our perception and management of these ecosystems. The assumption of homogeneity can lead to the conclusion that data collection from discrete, discontinuous points in space or time provide a comprehensive estimate of condition. To counter this perception, we combined high-density data collection with spatial interpolation techniques to created two-dimensional maps of water quality. Maps of four riverine transitions and habitats – wetland to urban, river to reservoir, river to estuary and a groundwater intrusion – were constructed from the continuous data. The examples provided show that the most basic water quality parameters - temperature, conductivity, salinity, turbidity, and chlorophyll florescence - are heterogeneous at spatial scales smaller than those captured by common point sampling statistical strategies. The 2-dimensional, interpolation-based maps of the Hillsborough River (Tampa, FL) show significant influences of a variety of geographic features including tributary confluences, submarine groundwater inflow, and riparian interfaces. We conclude that many sampling strategies do not account for the type of patchy heterogeneity observed. The integration of existing in-situ sensors, inexpensive autonomous sampling platforms, and geospatial mapping techniques provides high resolution visualization that can adds a more comprehensive geographic perspective needed for environmental monitoring and assessment programs.

[1]  C. Reynolds.  Hydroecology of river plankton: the role of variability in channel flow , 2000 .

[2]  A. D. Nickens,et al.  Science-based restoration monitoring of coastal habitats, Volume One: A framework for monitoring plans under the Estuaries and Clean Waters Act of 2000 (Public Law 160-457) , 2003 .

[3]  A. Casper,et al.  Combining Data Collection from Unmanned Surface Vehicles with Geospatial Analysis: Tools for Improving Surface Water Sampling, Monitoring, and Assessment , 2007, OCEANS 2007.

[4]  A. Casper,et al.  Diel and lateral patterns of zooplankton distribution in the St. Lawrence River , 2007 .

[5]  James G. Bellingham,et al.  The application of autonomous underwater vehicles for interdisciplinary measurements in Massachusetts and Cape Cod Bays , 2002 .

[6]  D. Gratton,et al.  Hydrodynamic control of the underwater light climate in fluvial Lac Saint‐Pierre , 2006 .

[7]  M. Böhme.  Distribution of water quality parameters in two cross-sections of the river Elbe measured with high local, temporal, and analytic resolution , 2006 .

[8]  Stuart Gage,et al.  Landscape approaches to the analysis of aquatic ecosystems , 1997 .

[9]  D. Caissie.  The thermal regime of rivers : a review , 2006 .

[10]  S. Atkinson,et al.  Near Real-Time Monitoring and Mapping of Specific Conductivity Levels Across Lake Texoma, USA , 2006, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[11]  J. Ward,et al.  The Four-Dimensional Nature of Lotic Ecosystems , 1989, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[12]  J. Thorp,et al.  Zooplankton assemblages in the Ohio River: seasonal, tributary, and navigation dam effects , 1994 .

[13]  J. Frenette,et al.  Photosynthetic and bacterial production gradients in a larval fish nursery: the St. Lawrence River transition zone , 1996 .

[14]  R. Kennedy,et al.  Rapid Collection of Spatially-Explicit In-Situ Water Quality Data Using a Programmable Towed Vehicle , 2002 .

[15]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[16]  C. Reynolds,et al.  The production, biomass and structure of phytoplankton in large rivers , 1996 .

[17]  M. Brunke,et al.  The ecological significance of exchange processes between rivers and groundwater , 1997 .

[18]  William Dixon,et al.  Review of aquatic monitoring program design , 1996 .

[19]  R. Conmy,et al.  Calibration and performance of a new in situ multi-channel fluorometer for measurement of colored dissolved organic matter in the ocean , 2004 .

[20]  J. Ward.  Thermal characteristics of running waters , 1985, Hydrobiologia.

[21]  M. Moline,et al.  Remote Environmental Monitoring Units: An Autonomous Vehicle for Characterizing Coastal Environments* , 2005 .

[22]  P. Stevenson,et al.  Mapping the 3D spatial distribution of dissolved manganese in coastal waters using an in situ analyser and the autonomous underwater vehicle Autosub , 2003 .

[23]  Chris S. Renschler,et al.  Spatially distributed assessment of short- and long-term impacts of multiple best management practices in agricultural watersheds , 2005 .

[24]  W. Junk.  The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems , 1989 .

[25]  David M. Cooper.  Some effects of sampling design on water quality estimation in streams / Quelques effets de la stratégie d’échantillonnage sur l’estimation de la qualité de l’eau des rivières , 2004 .

[26]  Carolyn T. Hunsaker,et al.  Hierarchical Approaches to the Study of Water Quality in RiversSpatial scale and terrestrial processes are important in developing models to translate research results to management practices , 1995 .

[27]  Michael R. Benjamin,et al.  Autonomous Underwater Vehicles: Trends and Transformations , 2005 .

[28]  J. Thorp,et al.  Effects of navigation dams, tributaries, and littoral zones on phytoplankton communities in the Ohio River , 1997 .

[29]  U. Uehlinger,et al.  Thermal patterns in the surface waters of a glacial river corridor (Val Roseg, Switzerland) , 2003 .

[30]  S. Fisher,et al.  Creativity, Idea Generation, and the Functional Morphology of Streams , 1997, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[31]  S. Grunwald,et al.  Modeling of the spatial variability of biogeochemical soil properties in a freshwater ecosystem , 2007 .

[32]  P. J. Auster.  ROV technologies and utilization by the science community , 1997 .

[33]  A. F. Casper,et al.  Combined GIS and ROV technologies improve characterization of water quality in coastal rivers of the Gulf of Mexico , 2009, OCEANS 2009.

[34]  E.T. Steimle,et al.  Unmanned Surface Vehicles as Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Tools , 2006, OCEANS 2006.

[35]  G. Lang,et al.  Groundwater Plume Mapping in a Submerged Sinkhole in Lake Huron , 2005 .

[36]  T. Johengen,et al.  Exploration of a Submerged Sinkhole Ecosystem in Lake Huron , 2006, Ecosystems.

[37]  M. Delong,et al.  The riverine ecosystem synthesis: biocomplexity in river networks across space and time , 2006 .

[38]  W. Vincent,et al.  The St. Lawrence River, Canada-USA: the Need for an Ecosystem-Level Understanding of Large Rivers , 1999 .

[39]  Alfred Wüest,et al.  Disrupting biogeochemical cycles - Consequences of damming , 2002, Aquatic Sciences.

[40]  R. Baxter.  Environmental Effects of Dams and Impoundments , 1977 .

[41]  R. Byrne,et al.  Spatial and temporal chemical variability in the Hillsborough River system , 2007 .

[42]  Y. Zhang,et al.  SPATIAL AND SEASONAL VARIABILITY IN THE COMPONENTS OF THE RIVER HEAT BUDGET , 1997 .

[43]  R. Dahlgren,et al.  Priming the productivity pump: flood pulse driven trends in suspended algal biomass distribution across a restored floodplain , 2006 .

[44]  R. Short,et al.  Environmental chemical mapping using an underwater mass spectrometer , 2004 .

[45]  T. Sommer,et al.  Hydrologic variability, water chemistry, and phytoplankton biomass in a large floodplain of the Sacramento River, CA, U.S.A. , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[46]  C. Frissell,et al.  COLD WATER PATCHES IN WARM STREAMS: PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND THE INFLUENCE OF SHADING 1 , 2003 .

[47]  S. Glenn,et al.  Long-term Real-time Coastal Ocean Observation Networks , 2000 .

[48]  W. Vincent,et al.  Trophic coupling across the St. Lawrence River estuarine transition zone , 2003 .