On the complexity of two-dimensional signed majority cellular automata

We study the complexity of signed majority cellular automata on the planar grid. We show that, depending on their symmetry and uniformity, they can simulate different types of logical circuitry under different modes. We use this to establish new bounds on their overall complexity, concretely: the uniform asymmetric and the non-uniform symmetric rules are Turing universal and have a P-complete prediction problem; the non-uniform asymmetric rule is in-trinsically universal; no symmetric rule can be intrinsically universal. We also show that the uniform asymmetric rules exhibit cycles of super-polynomial length, whereas symmetric ones are known to have bounded cycle length.

[1]  Eric Allender,et al.  Planar and Grid Graph Reachability Problems , 2009, Theory of Computing Systems.

[2]  Eric Goles Ch.,et al.  Periodic behaviour of generalized threshold functions , 1980, Discret. Math..

[3]  Ryuuzo Shingai,et al.  Maximum Period of 2-Dimensional Uniform Neural Networks , 1979, Inf. Control..

[4]  Eric Goles Ch. Threshold Networks and Generalizations , 1986, Automata Networks.

[5]  Eric Goles Ch.,et al.  The complexity of the bootstraping percolation and other problems , 2013, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[6]  Turlough Neary,et al.  P-completeness of Cellular Automaton Rule 110 , 2006, ICALP.

[7]  Nicolas Ollinger,et al.  Universalities in Cellular Automata , 2012, Handbook of Natural Computing.

[8]  Eric Goles Ch.,et al.  Communication complexity and intrinsic universality in cellular automata , 2011, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[9]  H. James Hoover,et al.  Limits to Parallel Computation: P-Completeness Theory , 1995 .

[10]  G. Hardy,et al.  An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers , 1938 .

[11]  Nicolas Ollinger,et al.  Four states are enough! , 2011, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[12]  F. Barahona On the computational complexity of Ising spin glass models , 1982 .

[13]  Dexter Kozen Theory of Computation , 2006, Texts in Computer Science.

[14]  E. Berlekamp,et al.  Winning Ways for Your Mathematical Plays , 1983 .

[15]  A. Waters Winning ways. , 2002, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[16]  Erik D. Demaine,et al.  The Two-Handed Tile Assembly Model is not Intrinsically Universal , 2013, Algorithmica.

[17]  Eric Goles Ch.,et al.  Decreasing energy functions as a tool for studying threshold networks , 1985, Discret. Appl. Math..

[18]  L. Bieche,et al.  On the ground states of the frustration model of a spin glass by a matching method of graph theory , 1980 .

[19]  Cristopher Moore Majority-Vote Cellular Automata, Ising Dynamics, and P-Completeness , 1997 .

[20]  Damien Regnault,et al.  Progresses in the analysis of stochastic 2D cellular automata: A study of asynchronous 2D minority , 2007, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[21]  Peter Bro Miltersen,et al.  On monotone planar circuits , 1999, Proceedings. Fourteenth Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (Formerly: Structure in Complexity Theory Conference) (Cat.No.99CB36317).

[22]  Nicolas Ollinger,et al.  Bulking I: An abstract theory of bulking , 2011, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[23]  Jack H. Lutz,et al.  The Tile Assembly Model is Intrinsically Universal , 2011, 2012 IEEE 53rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[24]  Eric Goles,et al.  The complexity of the majority rule on planar graphs , 2015, Adv. Appl. Math..

[25]  Edwin Roger Banks Universality in Cellular Automata , 1970, SWAT.

[26]  Guillaume Theyssier,et al.  ON LOCAL SYMMETRIES AND UNIVERSALITY IN CELLULAR , 2009 .

[27]  P. Leath,et al.  Bootstrap percolation on a Bethe lattice , 1979 .

[28]  M. Delorme,et al.  Cellular automata : a parallel model , 1999 .

[29]  Nicolas Ollinger,et al.  Bulking II: Classifications of cellular automata , 2010, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[30]  Matthew J. Patitz,et al.  Intrinsic universality in tile self-assembly requires cooperation , 2013, SODA.

[31]  Cristopher Moore,et al.  Quasilinear cellular automata , 1997, adap-org/9701001.