Brain imaging in the unsedated pediatric patient: comparison of periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction and single-shot fast spin-echo sequences.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER or PROP) is an effective means of compensating for head motion during MR imaging in adults. The aim of this study was to assess the value of this novel technique in unsedated children. METHODS PROP T2-weighted fast spin-echo (FSE) imaging (TR/TE/NEX, 4000/83/2; 50 seconds) and T2-weighted single-shot FSE (SS-FSE) imaging (19,929/92/0.5; imaging time, 25 seconds) were performed in 35 unsedated children (mean age, 4.7 years +/- 4.2) who were undergoing brain MR imaging. Two observers assessed unlabelled images for motion artifact, other artifacts, visibility of pathology, and the preferred image overall. Sequences were compared by using the chi(2) test and concordant data from both observers. RESULTS Both PROP and the SS-FSE imaging offered equal degrees of motion correction. Metallic artifacts were worse on PROP imaging, likely because of a higher receiver bandwidth (P <.001, chi(2) test). Pathology was present in 28 subjects and equally well seen on PROP and SS-FSE images. Overall, PROP was preferred, largely because of its improvements in image contrast (P <.001, chi(2) test). CONCLUSION SS-FSE imaging and PROP provide equal motion correction, although PROP enables better assessment of the brain parenchyma.

[1]  G H Glover,et al.  Projection Reconstruction Techniques for Reduction of Motion Effects in MRI , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  M Takahashi,et al.  Comparison of HASTE and segmented-HASTE sequences with a T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence in the screening evaluation of the brain. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  Bob S. Hu,et al.  Fast Spiral Coronary Artery Imaging , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  P. Walson,et al.  Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: addendum. , 2002, Pediatrics.

[5]  J G Pipe,et al.  PROPELLER MRI: Clinical testing of a novel technique for quantification and compensation of head motion , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  R L Ehman,et al.  Influence of physiologic motion on the appearance of tissue in MR images. , 1986, Radiology.

[7]  J. Felmlee,et al.  Adaptive technique for high-definition MR imaging of moving structures. , 1989, Radiology.

[8]  K. Linnau,et al.  Ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[9]  R. Alfidi,et al.  The effect of motion on two-dimensional Fourier transformation magnetic resonance images. , 1984, Radiology.

[10]  A prospective comparison of brain contrast characteristics and lesion detection using single-shot fast spin-echo and fast spin-echo , 1999, Neuroradiology.

[11]  J. Pipe.  Motion correction with PROPELLER MRI: Application to head motion and free‐breathing cardiac imaging , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.