Speaking in noise: How does the Lombard effect improve acoustic contrasts between speech and ambient noise?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. H. Bernacki,et al. Effects of noise on speech production: acoustic and perceptual analyses. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] D. Dubois,et al. Influence of sound immersion and communicative interaction on the Lombard effect. , 2010, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[3] H. Pick,et al. Inhibiting the Lombard effect. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] C. Darwin,et al. Perceptual separation of simultaneous vowels: within and across-formant grouping by F0. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] B. J. Stanton,et al. Acoustic-phonetic analysis of loud and Lombard speech in simulated cockpit conditions , 1988, ICASSP-88., International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.
[6] T A Ricketts,et al. The effects of compression ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, and level on speech recognition in normal-hearing listeners. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] Johan Sundberg,et al. Effects of vocal loudness variation on spectrum balance as reflected by the alpha measure of long-term-average spectra of speech. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] J. Liénard,et al. Effect of vocal effort on spectral properties of vowels. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] David B. Pisoni,et al. Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics , 1996, Speech Commun..
[10] J. C. Steinberg,et al. Factors Governing the Intelligibility of Speech Sounds , 1945 .
[11] Jean-Claude Junqua,et al. Influence of the speaking style and the noise spectral tilt on the lombard reflex and automatic speech recognition , 1998, ICSLP.
[12] Martin Cooke,et al. Speech production modifications produced by competing talkers, babble, and stationary noise. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] Irene Velsvik Bele. The speaker's formant. , 2006, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.
[14] R. Schulman,et al. Articulatory dynamics of loud and normal speech. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] I R Titze,et al. Vocal intensity in speakers and singers. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] I R Titze,et al. On the relation between subglottal pressure and fundamental frequency in phonation. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[17] Maeva Garnier,et al. May speech modifications in noise contribute to enhance audio-visible cues to segment perception? , 2008, AVSP.
[18] M. Picheny,et al. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[19] Marion Dohen,et al. The Lombard Effect: a physiological reflex or a controlled intelligibility enhancement? , 2006 .
[20] S R Garber,et al. The Lombard sign as a function of age and task. , 1982, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[21] G. Weismer,et al. The effects of a flattened fundamental frequency on intelligibility at the sentence level. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[22] D S Brungart,et al. Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[23] D. M. Green,et al. Frequency discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[24] Martin Cooke,et al. Speech production modifications produced in the presence of low-pass and high-pass filtered noise. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[25] J C Junqua,et al. The Lombard reflex and its role on human listeners and automatic speech recognizers. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[26] John G. Harris,et al. Applied principles of clear and Lombard speech for automated intelligibility enhancement in noisy environments , 2006, Speech Commun..
[27] John J. Dreher,et al. Effects of ambient noise on speaker intelligibility of words and phrases , 1957, The Laryngoscope.
[28] Martin Cooke,et al. The contribution of changes in F0 and spectral tilt to increased intelligibility of speech produced in noise , 2009, Speech Commun..
[29] Kentaro Ishizuka,et al. Effect of F0 fluctuation and amplitude modulation of natural vowels on vowel identification in noisy environments , 2002, INTERSPEECH.
[30] Maria Södersten,et al. Cancellation of simulated environmental noise as a tool for measuring vocal performance during noise exposure. , 2002, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.
[31] H. Traunmüller,et al. Acoustic effects of variation in vocal effort by men, women, and children. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[32] Oliver Jung. On the Lombard Effect Induced by Vehicle Interior Driving Noises, Regarding Sound Pressure Level and Long-Term Average Speech Spectrum , 2012 .
[33] Q. Summerfield,et al. Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: vowels with different fundamental frequencies. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[34] Francisco Casacuberta,et al. An analysis of general acoustic-phonetic features for Spanish speech produced with the Lombard effect , 1996, Speech Commun..
[35] T. Wiley,et al. Recognition of speech produced in noise. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[36] Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al. Factors affecting the benefits of high-frequency amplification. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[37] Jean C. Krause,et al. Acoustic properties of naturally produced clear speech at normal speaking rates. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[38] C. M. Marin,et al. Segregation of concurrent sounds. II: Effects of spectral envelope tracing, frequency modulation coherence, and frequency modulation width. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[39] C. Darwin,et al. Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length changes on attention to one of two simultaneous talkers. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[40] D. M. Green,et al. Intensity discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[41] P E Souza,et al. Effect of compression ratio on speech recognition and speech-quality ratings with wide dynamic range compression amplification. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[42] C. Darwin,et al. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section a Human Experimental Psychology Perceptual Grouping of Speech Components Differing in Fundamental Frequency and Onset-time Perceptual Grouping of Speech Components Differing in Fundamental Frequency and Onset-time , 2022 .