Identification of Localized Damage in Structures Using Highly Incomplete Modal Information

The objective of this paper is to provide a new theoretical basis to localize and quantify sparse damage in a structure based on highly incomplete modal information. Although a large number of papers have been written on the subject, this paper offers a new perspective on the problem by proposing the L-1 norm minimization criteria, in contrast to the more traditional L-2 (Euclidean) norm minimization criterion. The proposed L-1 norm approach enables accurate and robust examination of a number of potential damage locations much larger than the number of frequencies used in the formulation of the modal sensitivity matrix. In addition, it is shown that L-1 minimization leads to sparse solutions, this is in contrast with the L-2 criteria, which leads to disperse solutions. The computational effort necessary to solve the L-1 optimization is significantly larger than in the traditional Euclidean norm and requires the use of convex optimization algorithms. However, given the results that can be obtained, the computational effort is justified. The efficacy of the proposed framework is demonstrated in detecting sparse damage in a simulated 21 degree of freedom shear building structure.

[1]  Babak Moaveni,et al.  Environmental effects on the identified natural frequencies of the Dowling Hall Footbridge , 2011 .

[2]  Ka-Veng Yuen Updating large models for mechanical systems using incomplete modal measurement , 2012 .

[3]  O. S. Salawu Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency: a review , 1997 .

[4]  Y. Rudy,et al.  Application of L1-Norm Regularization to Epicardial Potential Solution of the Inverse Electrocardiography Problem , 2009, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  Uncertainty bounds on modal parameters obtained from stochastic subspace identification , 2008 .

[6]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  A review of structural health monitoring literature 1996-2001 , 2002 .

[7]  Hui Li,et al.  Structural damage identification based on substructure sensitivity and l1 sparse regularization , 2013, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[8]  E. Candès,et al.  Sparsity and incoherence in compressive sampling , 2006, math/0611957.

[9]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  The sensitivity method in finite element model updating: A tutorial (vol 25, pg 2275, 2010) , 2011 .

[10]  Michael Elad,et al.  Optimally sparse representation in general (nonorthogonal) dictionaries via ℓ1 minimization , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[12]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: A literature review , 1996 .

[13]  Ron Potter,et al.  Identification of the Modal Properties of an Elastic Structure From Measured Transfer Function Data , 1974 .

[14]  Chen Yang,et al.  Membership-set identification method for structural damage based on measured natural frequencies and static displacements , 2013 .

[15]  M Richardson DETECTION OF DAMAGE IN STRUCTURES FROM CHANGES IN THEIR DYNAMIC (MODAL) PROPERTIES - A SURVEY , 1980 .

[16]  David A. Nix,et al.  Vibration–based structural damage identification , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.