Change in the Organization of Degrees of Freedom With Learning

The authors examined the effects of learning on the change in the organization of the mechanical and dynamical degrees of freedom in 5 men who performed a ski-simulator task. A 3-dimensional analysis of the motion of the total-body center of mass and the segmental centers of mass (head, torso, thighs, and shanks) over practice showed that the recruitment of mechanical degrees of freedom was strongly influenced by anatomical and task constraints. Principal components analysis of the body segments' motions revealed that practice shifted their relative contributions but did not change the number of principal components. The present findings show that there can be independence in the patterns of change in the mechanical and dynamical degrees of freedom that arise from practice.

[1]  Peter J. Beek,et al.  Timing and Phase Locking in Cascade Juggling , 1989 .

[2]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  The spontaneous recruitment and suppression of degrees of freedom in rhythmic hand movements , 1997 .

[3]  J. Kelso,et al.  Evolution of behavioral attractors with learning: nonequilibrium phase transitions. , 1992 .

[4]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Changes in limb dynamics during the practice of rapid arm movements. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  K M Newell,et al.  Learning the Pedalo Locomotion Task , 2005, Journal of motor behavior.

[6]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Learning to Coordinate Redundant Biomechanical Degrees of Freedom , 1994 .

[7]  M. Turvey,et al.  Intermediate motor learning as decreasing active (dynamical) degrees of freedom , 1998 .

[8]  Karl M Newell,et al.  Learning to coordinate redundant degrees of freedom in a dynamic balance task. , 2003, Human movement science.

[9]  Beatrix Vereijken,et al.  Changing coordinative structures in complex skill acquisition , 1997 .

[10]  G. Schöner.  Recent Developments and Problems in Human Movement Science and Their Conceptual Implications , 1995 .

[11]  J. Kelso,et al.  Coordination dynamics of learning and transfer: collective and component levels. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  M. Latash,et al.  Motor Control Strategies Revealed in the Structure of Motor Variability , 2002, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[13]  B. Vereijken,et al.  Free(z)ing Degrees of Freedom in Skill Acquisition , 1992 .

[14]  R. Emmerik,et al.  The effects of practice on limb kinematics in a throwing task. , 1989, Journal of motor behavior.

[15]  H T Whiting,et al.  Preferred Tempo in the Learning of a Gross Cyclical Action , 1989, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[16]  D Nourrit,et al.  The effects of required amplitude and practice on frequency stability and efficiency in a cyclical task , 2000, Journal of sports sciences.

[17]  John T. McConville,et al.  INVESTIGATION OF INERTIAL PROPERTIES OF THE HUMAN BODY , 1975 .

[18]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  K. Newell,et al.  Dimensional change in motor learning. , 2001, Human movement science.

[20]  D. Southard,et al.  Changing Movement Patterns: Effects of Demonstration and Practice , 1987 .

[21]  J. Taylor,et al.  Principles of Brain Functioning , 1999 .

[22]  Sam Kash Kachigan.  Statistical Analysis: An Interdisciplinary Introduction to Univariate & Multivariate Methods , 1986 .

[23]  G. Edelman,et al.  Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  B. Steenbergen,et al.  Achieving Coordination in Prehension: Joint Freezing and Postural Contributions. , 1995, Journal of motor behavior.

[25]  P G Zanone,et al.  Evolution of behavioral attractors with learning: nonequilibrium phase transitions. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  N. A. Bernshteĭn.  The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[27]  V K Jirsa,et al.  Recruitment of degrees of freedom stabilizes coordination. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  D Nourrit,et al.  Overcoming spontaneous patterns of coordination during the acquisition of a complex balancing task. , 2002, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[29]  Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky,et al.  Muscle synergies during shifts of the center of pressure by standing persons , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  Didier Delignières,et al.  On Discontinuities in Motor Learning: A Longitudinal Study of Complex Skill Acquisition on a Ski-Simulator , 2003, Journal of motor behavior.

[31]  W. J. Beek,et al.  A Dynamical Systems Approach to Skill Acquisition , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[32]  Kate Kerr,et al.  Neuromechanical Basis of Kinesiology , 1996 .

[33]  John J. Buchanan,et al.  Learning a single limb multijoint coordination pattern: the impact of a mechanical constraint on the coordination dynamics of learning and transfer , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  J. Kelso,et al.  To Switch or Not to Switch: Recruitment of Degrees of Freedom Stabilizes Biological Coordination. , 1999, Journal of motor behavior.

[35]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  The acquisition of coordination: Preliminary analysis of learning to write , 1989 .