Using Behavioral Economic Field Experiments at a Large Motor Carrier: The Context and Design of the Truckers and Turnover Project

The Truckers and Turnover Project is a statistical case study of a single firm and its employees which matches proprietary personnel and operational data to new data collected by the researchers to create a two-year panel study of a large subset of new hires. The project's most distinctive innovation is the data collection process which combines traditional survey instruments with behavioral economics experiments. The survey data include information on demographics, risk and loss aversion, time preference, planning, non-verbal IQ, and the MPQ personality profile. The data collected by behavioral economics experiments include risk and loss aversion, time preferences (discount rates), backward induction, patience, and the preference for cooperation in a social dilemma setting. Subjects will be followed over two years of their work lives. Among the major design goals are to discover the extent to which the survey and experimental measures are correlated, and whether and how much predictive power, with respect to key on-the-job outcome variables, is added by the behavioral measures. The panel study of new hires is being carried out against the backdrop of a second research component, the development of a more conventional in-depth statistical case study of the cooperating firm and its employees. This is a high-turnover service industry setting, and the focus is on the use of survival analysis to model the flow of new employees into and out of employment, and on the correct estimation of the tenure-productivity curve for new hires, accounting for the selection effects of the high turnover.

[1]  Kristen Monaco,et al.  The Effects of Deregulation, De-Unionization, Technology, and Human Capital on the Work and Work Lives of Truck Drivers , 2001 .

[2]  Christopher J Patrick,et al.  Development and validation of a brief form of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. , 2002, Psychological assessment.

[3]  Stephen V. Burks,et al.  The Balance Between Private and For-Hire Carriage and Trends in the Use of Large Trucks (1977 to 1997) , 2010 .

[4]  Brenda White,et al.  DEPARTMENT OF LABOR , 2006 .

[5]  T M Corsi,et al.  EFFECTS OF DEREGULATED ENVIRONMENT ON MOTOR CARRIERS: A SYSTEMATIC, MULTISEGMENTED ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[6]  L. Kalnbach,et al.  PREDICTING AND CLASSIFYING VOLUNTARY TURNOVER DECISIONS FOR TRUCKLOAD DRIVERS , 2002 .

[7]  Kenneth D. Boyer,et al.  Stuck in the Slow Lane: Traffic Composition and the Measurement of Labor Productivity in the U.S. Trucking Industry , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[8]  Eric Alden Smith,et al.  Foundations of Human Sociality: Economic Experiments and Ethnographic Evidence from Fifteen Small‐Scale Societies , 2006 .

[9]  Michael H. Belzer,et al.  Collective Bargaining after Deregulation: Do the Teamsters Still Count? , 1995 .

[10]  Lawrence R. Mishel,et al.  The State of Working America , 1991 .

[11]  J. F. Casey AN ASSESSMENT OF THE TRUCK DRIVER SHORTAGE , 1987 .

[12]  W. Dickens,et al.  Labor Market Segmentation Theory: Reconsidering the Evidence , 1992 .

[13]  U. Fischbacher z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments , 1999 .

[14]  Jared Bernstein,et al.  The State of Working America, 2002/2003 , 2005 .

[15]  R. Fox,et al.  DRIVER RETENTION SOLUTIONS: STRATEGIES FOR FOR-HIRE TRUCKLOAD (TL) EMPLOYEE DRIVERS , 1996 .

[16]  W. Darity Labor Economics: Problems in Analyzing Labor Markets , 1994 .

[17]  D. McGee An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using Stata (rev.) , 2005 .

[18]  Lorenz Goette,et al.  Performance Pay and the Erosion of Worker Cooperation: Field Experimental Evidence , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[19]  Jonathan S Reiskin Shipper changes cut distances that truckload freight travels , 2006 .

[20]  Stephen V. Burks,et al.  The origins of parallel segmented labor and product markets: A reciprocity -based agency model with an application to motor freight , 1999 .

[21]  N. Kiefer Economic Duration Data and Hazard Functions , 1988 .

[22]  O. Bandiera,et al.  Social preferences and the response to incentives: Evidence from personnel data , 2005 .

[23]  Kristi Cox,et al.  TL DRIVER TURNOVER RATE REACHES NEW RECORD HIGH , 2004 .

[24]  Andrew D Beadle,et al.  BUILDING DRIVER SHORTAGE , 2004 .

[25]  G. Harrison,et al.  Field experiments , 1924, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[26]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Measuring Social Norms and Preferences Using Experimental Games: A Guide for Social Scientists , 2002 .

[27]  G. Cain The Challenge of Segmented Labor Market Theories to Orthodox Theory: A Survey , 1976 .

[28]  O. Bandiera,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperative Norms: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment , 2005 .

[29]  J. Raven,et al.  Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales , 1962 .