What factors inhibit publicly funded principal investigators’ commercialization activities?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] James A. Cunningham,et al. Gender differences and academic entrepreneurship: a study of scientists in the principal investigator role , 2017 .
[2] John P. Walsh,et al. Creativity in scientific teams: : Unpacking novelty and impact , 2015 .
[3] Marie C. Thursby,et al. Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major U.S. Universities , 2001 .
[4] M. Menter,et al. Principal Investigators and the Commercialization of Knowledge , 2016 .
[5] A. Link,et al. Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. , 2004 .
[6] Corine Genet,et al. Principal investigators as scientific entrepreneurs , 2014 .
[7] Mike Wright,et al. Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: A multi-dimensional taxonomy , 2006 .
[8] Gerard George,et al. Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity , 2009 .
[9] Catherine Beaudry,et al. Impact of public and private research funding on scientific production: The case of nanotechnology , 2012 .
[10] S. Rosser,et al. Institutionalization, Sustainability, and Repeatability of ADVANCE for Institutional Transformation , 2006 .
[11] Pascale G. Quester,et al. Satisfaction with university-industry relationships : the impact of commitment, trust and championship , 2006 .
[12] D. Parr,et al. How to restore public trust in science , 1999, Nature.
[13] Terttu Luukkonen,et al. Conservatism and risk-taking in peer review: Emerging ERC practices , 2012 .
[14] Conor O’Kane. Technology transfer executives' backwards integration: An examination of interactions between university technology transfer executives and principal investigators , 2016, Technovation.
[15] Melita Nicotra,et al. Entrepreneurial performance of principal investigators and country culture: relations and influences , 2017 .
[16] T. Allen,et al. Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities , 2005 .
[17] Holly J. Falk-Krzesinski,et al. Mapping a research agenda for the science of team science. , 2011, Research Evaluation.
[18] Gianni Lorenzoni,et al. Closing the distance between academia and market: experimentation and user entrepreneurial processes , 2014 .
[19] David B. Audretsch,et al. The Bayh-Dole Act and scientist entrepreneurship , 2011 .
[20] Benjamin F. Jones,et al. Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .
[21] Thomas Bolli,et al. Do competitively acquired funds induce universities to increase productivity , 2011 .
[22] Daniel L. Fay,et al. Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art , 2012, The Journal of Technology Transfer.
[23] Jeannette A. Colyvas,et al. Breaking the Ivory Tower: Academic Entrepreneurship in the Life Sciences in UK and Germany , 2011 .
[24] Ekaterina Albats,et al. A micro level study of university industry collaborative lifecycle key performance indicators , 2018 .
[25] E. Welch,et al. Commercialization of university inventions: Individual and institutional factors affecting licensing of university patents , 2015 .
[26] B. Latour,et al. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .
[27] Branco Ponomariov,et al. Management knowledge and the organization of team science in university research centers , 2014 .
[28] Vincent Mangematin,et al. PIs as boundary spanners, science and market shapers , 2014 .
[29] K. Pavitt. What makes basic research economically useful , 1991 .
[30] James A. Cunningham,et al. The inhibiting factors that principal investigators experience in leading publicly funded research , 2014 .
[31] David Bennett,et al. University to business technology transfer—UK and USA comparisons , 2007 .
[32] S. Fiore. Interdisciplinarity as Teamwork , 2008 .
[33] Niclas Adler,et al. The challenge of managing boundary-spanning research activities: Experiences from the Swedish context , 2009 .
[34] J. S. Katz,et al. What is research collaboration , 1997 .
[35] Dagmara Weckowska,et al. Learning in university technology transfer offices: transactions-focused and relations-focused approaches to commercialization of academic research , 2015 .
[36] L. Leydesdorff,et al. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .
[37] Federica Rossi,et al. Finding the Right Partners: Institutional and personal modes of governance of university-industry interactions , 2013 .
[38] P. D'Este,et al. The relationship between research funding and academic consulting: An empirical investigation in the Spanish context , 2013 .
[39] L. Leydesdorff,et al. Emergence of a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations , 1996 .
[40] Diana Hicks,et al. Equity and Excellence in Research Funding , 2011 .
[41] M. Wright,et al. Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity : Evidence from the EU framework program , 2009 .
[42] N. Rosenberg. Why do firms do basic research (with their own money) , 1990 .
[43] T. Elkins,et al. Leadership in research and development organizations: A literature review and conceptual framework , 2003 .
[44] Waverly W. Ding,et al. When Do Scientists Become Entrepreneurs? The Social Structural Antecedents of Commercial Activity in the Academic Life Sciences1 , 2006, American Journal of Sociology.
[45] Ben R. Martin,et al. The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research , 1996, Scientometrics.
[46] Vincent Mangematin,et al. Underpinning Strategic Behaviours and Posture of Principal Investigators In Transition/Uncertain Environments , 2015 .
[47] D Blumenthal,et al. Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.
[48] Alice Lam,et al. From ‘Ivory Tower Traditionalists’ to ‘Entrepreneurial Scientists’? Academic Scientists in Fuzzy University-Industry Boundaries , 2009 .
[49] Stéphane Malo,et al. The contribution of (not so) public research to commercial innovations in the field of combinatorial chemistry , 2009 .
[50] Donna K. Kidwell,et al. Principal investigators as knowledge brokers: A multiple case study of the creative actions of PIs in entrepreneurial science , 2013 .
[51] James A. Cunningham,et al. Publicly funded principal investigators allocation of time for public sector entrepreneurship activities , 2016 .
[52] R. Keller,et al. A Longitudinal Study of the Individual Characteristics of Effective R&D Project Team Leaders , 2017 .
[53] Waverly W. Ding,et al. The Determinants of Faculty Patenting Behavior: Demographics or Opportunities? , 2005 .
[54] James A. Cunningham,et al. Managerial challenges of publicly funded principal investigators , 2015, Int. J. Technol. Manag..
[55] Donna K. Kidwell,et al. Navigating the role of the principal investigator: a comparison of four cases , 2014 .
[56] S. Schwartzman,et al. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .
[57] A. Salter,et al. The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review , 2001 .
[58] A. Geuna,et al. University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence , 2006 .
[59] Diana Nadine Boehm,et al. ‘A jack of all trades’: the role of PIs in the establishment and management of collaborative networks in scientific knowledge commercialisation , 2014 .
[60] Grit Laudel,et al. The ‘Quality Myth’: Promoting and Hindering Conditions for Acquiring Research Funds , 2006 .
[61] M. Feldman,et al. The mechanisms of collaboration in inventive teams: Composition, social networks, and geography , 2011 .
[62] A. Salter,et al. Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University-Industry Relations , 2012 .