The ASACUSA antihydrogen and hydrogen program: results and prospects

The goal of the ASACUSA-CUSP collaboration at the Antiproton Decelerator of CERN is to measure the ground-state hyperfine splitting of antihydrogen using an atomic spectroscopy beamline. A milestone was achieved in 2012 through the detection of 80 antihydrogen atoms 2.7 m away from their production region. This was the first observation of ‘cold’ antihydrogen in a magnetic field free region. In parallel to the progress on the antihydrogen production, the spectroscopy beamline was tested with a source of hydrogen. This led to a measurement at a relative precision of 2.7×10−9 which constitutes the most precise measurement of the hydrogen hyperfine splitting in a beam. Further measurements with an upgraded hydrogen apparatus are motivated by CPT and Lorentz violation tests in the framework of the Standard Model Extension. Unlike for hydrogen, the antihydrogen experiment is complicated by the difficulty of synthesizing enough cold antiatoms in the ground state. The first antihydrogen quantum states scan at the entrance of the spectroscopy apparatus was realized in 2016 and is presented here. The prospects for a ppm measurement are also discussed. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue ‘Antiproton physics in the ELENA era’.

[1]  K. Blaum,et al.  Double-trap measurement of the proton magnetic moment at 0.3 parts per billion precision , 2017, Science.

[2]  Y. Yamazaki,et al.  A parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment , 2017, Nature.

[3]  C. J. Baker,et al.  Observation of the hyperfine spectrum of antihydrogen , 2017, Nature.

[4]  M. Simon,et al.  Elsevier : Annihilation detector for an in-beam spectroscopy apparatus to measure the ground state hyperfine splitting of antihydrogen , 2017 .

[5]  T. Tanaka,et al.  Sixfold improved single particle measurement of the magnetic moment of the antiproton , 2017, Nature Communications.

[6]  L. Venturelli,et al.  Direct detection of antihydrogen atoms using a BGO crystal , 2016 .

[7]  C. J. Baker,et al.  Observation of the 1S–2S transition in trapped antihydrogen , 2016, Nature.

[8]  Hiroyuki Yamada,et al.  Buffer-gas cooling of antiprotonic helium to 1.5 to 1.7 K, and antiproton-to–electron mass ratio , 2016, Science.

[9]  M. Simon,et al.  In-beam measurement of the hydrogen hyperfine splitting and prospects for antihydrogen spectroscopy , 2016, Nature Communications.

[10]  M. A. Diaz Corchero,et al.  Precision measurement of the mass difference between light nuclei and anti-nuclei with ALICE at the LHC , 2016 .

[11]  Y. Kanai,et al.  The development of the superconducting double cusp magnet for intense antihydrogen beams , 2015 .

[12]  Y. Yamazaki,et al.  High-precision comparison of the antiproton-to-proton charge-to-mass ratio , 2015, Nature.

[13]  C. Malbrunot,et al.  Towards a precise measurement of the antihydrogen ground state hyperfine splitting in a beam: the case of in-flight radiative decays , 2015 .

[14]  Y. Kanai,et al.  Towards measuring the ground state hyperfine splitting of antihydrogen – a progress report , 2015, 1606.01791.

[15]  Arnaldo J. Vargas,et al.  Lorentz and C P T tests with hydrogen, antihydrogen, and related systems , 2015, 1506.01706.

[16]  Y. Nagata,et al.  A novel property of anti-Helmholz coils for in-coil syntheses of antihydrogen atoms: formation of a focused spin-polarized beam , 2014 .

[17]  J. Borburgh,et al.  Extra Low ENergy Antiproton (ELENA) ring and its Transfer Lines: Design Report , 2014 .

[18]  S. Federmann,et al.  A source of antihydrogen for in-flight hyperfine spectroscopy , 2014, Nature Communications.

[19]  E. A. Hessels,et al.  One-particle measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[20]  T. Hänsch,et al.  Improved measurement of the hydrogen 1S-2S transition frequency. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[21]  Y. Kanai,et al.  Synthesis of cold antihydrogen in a cusp trap. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[22]  A. Kostelecký,et al.  Electrodynamics with Lorentz-violating operators of arbitrary dimension , 2009, 0905.0031.

[23]  F. Robicheaux.  Atomic processes in antihydrogen experiments: a theoretical and computational perspective , 2008 .

[24]  E. al.,et al.  Final report of the E821 muon anomalous magnetic moment measurement at BNL , 2006, hep-ex/0602035.

[25]  J. Friar,et al.  Zemach moments for hydrogen and deuterium , 2003, nucl-th/0310043.

[26]  Y. Yamazaki,et al.  A possible new scheme to synthesize antihydrogen and to prepare a polarised antihydrogen beam , 2003 .

[27]  E. A. Hessels,et al.  Driven production of cold antihydrogen and the first measured distribution of antihydrogen states. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[28]  E. A. Hessels,et al.  Background-free observation of cold antihydrogen with field-ionization analysis of its states. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[29]  A. Fontana,et al.  Production and detection of cold antihydrogen atoms , 2002, Nature.

[30]  W. Pauli,et al.  Exclusion Principle, Lorentz Group and Reflection of Space-Time and Charge , 2002 .

[31]  D. F. Phillips,et al.  Testing CPT and Lorentz symmetry with hydrogen masers , 2001, physics/0103068.

[32]  D. Phillips,et al.  Limit on Lorentz and CPT violation of the proton using a hydrogen maser , 2000, physics/0008230.

[33]  Garching,et al.  Some possibilities for laboratory searches for variations of fundamental constants , 2000, physics/0008051.

[34]  D. Phillips,et al.  Double-resonance frequency shift in a hydrogen maser , 2000, physics/0007056.

[35]  A. Kostelecký,et al.  $CPT$ and Lorentz Tests in Hydrogen and Antihydrogen , 1998, hep-ph/9810269.

[36]  A. Kostelecký,et al.  Lorentz-Violating Extension of the Standard Model , 1998, hep-ph/9809521.

[37]  M. Mandelkern,et al.  Observation of Atomic Antihydrogen , 1997 .

[38]  A. Kostelecký,et al.  $CPT$ violation and the standard model , 1997, hep-ph/9703464.

[39]  Sandberg,et al.  Two-Photon Spectroscopy of Trapped Atomic Hydrogen. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[40]  A. Buzzo,et al.  Production of antihydrogen , 1996 .

[41]  Bock,et al.  CPT tests in the neutral kaon system. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[42]  N. Ramsey.  Atomic Hydrogen Hyperfine Structure Experiments , 1990 .

[43]  N. Ramsey,et al.  Experiments with Separated Oscillatory Fields and Hydrogen Masers , 1990, Science.

[44]  Van Dyck,et al.  New high-precision comparison of electron and positron g factors. , 1987, Physical review letters.

[45]  Crawford,et al.  Precision measurement of the mass difference & , 1986, Physical review letters.

[46]  E. G. Hope,et al.  Hydrogen Maser Work at the National Physical Laboratory , 1973 .

[47]  E. G. Hope,et al.  Frequency of the Hydrogen Maser , 1971, Nature.

[48]  Helmut Hellwig,et al.  Measurement of the Unperturbed Hydrogen Hyperfine Transition Frequency , 1970 .

[49]  G. Lüders.  Proof of the TCP theorem , 1957 .

[50]  P. Kusch.  Redetermination of the Hyperfine Splittings of Hydrogen and Deuterium in the Ground State , 1955 .

[51]  J. Bell.  Time reversal in field theory , 1955, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[52]  A. Prodell,et al.  Hyperfine structure of hydrogen and deuterium , 1950 .

[53]  L. W. Mckeehan,et al.  Combinations of Circular Currents for Producing Uniform Magnetic Fields , 1936 .

[54]  I. Rabi,et al.  Measurement of Nuclear Spin , 1931 .

[55]  S. A. Cuendis.  MEASURING THE HYDROGEN GROUND STATE HYPERFINE SPLITTING THROUGH THE π 1 AND σ 1 TRANSITIONS , 2017 .

[56]  J. Wurtele,et al.  Trapped antihydrogen , 2010, Nature.

[57]  G. Gabrielse,et al.  Proposal presented to the SPSLC : The production and study of cold antihydrogen , 1997 .

[58]  W. Pauli,et al.  Niels Bohr and the Development of Physics , 1955 .

[59]  G. Luders.  On the equivalence of invariance under time reversal and under particle-antiparticle conjugation for relativistic field theories , 1954 .