Sponsored, contract and collaborative research: towards a model of science-industry knowledge transfer

Using the knowledge-based view of the firm, this paper contributes to improving our understanding of science-industry interaction. Based on research in the Swiss biotech sector, it provides a categorisation of three forms of interaction – sponsored, contract and collaborative research. Taking the process of knowledge transfer, interaction context, and knowledge context into account, the results indicate that these forms of interaction involve distinct ways of organising science?industry knowledge transfer. Arguing that the management of these interactions involves finding a delicate balance between structure and freedom, we suggest that the optimal managerial approach is contingent upon the form of interaction.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[2]  Robert E. Spekman.  ALLIANCE MANAGEMENT: A VIEW FROM THE PAST AND A LOOK TO THE FUTURE* , 1998 .

[3]  Shanthi Gopalakrishnan,et al.  Distinguishing between knowledge transfer and technology transfer activities: the role of key organizational factors , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[4]  A. Link,et al.  Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. , 2004 .

[5]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[6]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[7]  C. Galbraith.  Transferring Core Manufacturing Technologies in High-Technology Firms , 1990 .

[8]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[9]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[10]  D. King.  The scientific impact of nations , 2004, Nature.

[11]  Gabriel Szulanski.  The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness , 2000 .

[12]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: How Do University Inventions Get Into Practice? , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[13]  D. Teece.  Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How , 1977 .

[14]  A. Agrawal.  University-to-industry knowledge transfer: literature review and unanswered questions , 2001 .

[15]  Arvind Parkhe,et al.  Building trust in international alliances , 1998 .

[16]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[17]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[18]  M. Polanyi,et al.  Tacit Knowing: Its Bearing on Some Problems of Philosophy , 1962 .

[19]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions , 2001 .

[20]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  University Licensing and the Bayh-Dole Act , 2003, Science.

[21]  Alok K. Chakrabarti,et al.  FIRM SIZE AND TECHNOLOGY CENTRALITY IN INDUSTRY-UNIVERSITY INTERACTIONS , 2002 .

[22]  G. Krogh.  Care in Knowledge Creation , 1998 .

[23]  D. Dougherty.  A PRACTICE-CENTERED MODEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL RENEWAL THROUGH PRODUCT INNOVATION , 1992 .

[24]  Lawrence M. Wein,et al.  Economics of Product Development by Users: the Impact of Sticky Local Information , 1998 .

[25]  D. E. Stokes.  Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation , 1997 .

[26]  Michael D. Santoro,et al.  Facilitators of Knowledge Transfer in University-Industry Collaborations: A Knowledge-Based Perspective , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[27]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm , 2000 .

[28]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery , 2003 .

[29]  Jeffrey Cummings,et al.  Transferring R&D Knowledge : the Key Factors Affecting Knowledge Transfer Success , 2003 .

[30]  I. Nonaka,et al.  SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[31]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital , 2000 .

[32]  Christian Marxt,et al.  Success factors for cooperative ventures in innovation and production systems , 2002 .

[33]  E. Mansfield.  Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings1 , 1998 .

[34]  Robert M. Grant,et al.  The knowledge-based view of the firm: Implications for management practice , 1997 .

[35]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[36]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[37]  U. Schmoch,et al.  Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields , 1998 .

[38]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  Creating effective University-industry alliances: An organizational learning perspective , 1997 .

[39]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[40]  Michael Gibbons,et al.  Science's new social contract with society , 1999, Nature.

[41]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge , 2006 .

[42]  R. Katz,et al.  Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups , 1982 .

[43]  G. Hamel.  Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[44]  Michael Gibbons,et al.  Introduction: `Mode 2' Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge , 2003 .

[45]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science , 2002 .

[46]  E. Hippel.  Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[47]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[48]  B. Kogut,et al.  Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks , 1999 .

[49]  J. Dutton,et al.  Treating Progress Functions as a Managerial Opportunity , 1984 .

[50]  D. Schoen.  The Reflective Practitioner , 1983 .