Energy dependent polymerization of resin-based composite.

OBJECTIVE This study explores the relationship between the extent of polymerization and the radiant energy (dose) applied during the photopolymerization of resin-based composites. METHOD FTIR was used to measure the 5-min and 24-h conversion of four resin-based composites prepared in a thin film and polymerized under conditions of decreasing intensity and a constant exposure time (30s) using a tungsten halogen curing light. The measured conversion was obtained over a wide range of applied radiant energy. Additionally, samples for two of the materials were polymerized at various intensities and exposure times such that the dose remained constant. This process was performed at four dose levels representing approximately 75% of the conversion range. RESULTS The curing profiles (percent conversion versus applied radiant energy) depict a gradual decrease in conversion with decreasing energy followed by a rapid descent. Though there are differences in the maximum conversion attained between the materials, when conversion is represented as a fractional conversion relative to the maximum 24-h value, their 5-min and 24-h curing profiles appear quite similar. Additionally, very similar conversion was measured when the films were exposed using equivalent doses providing evidence for a reciprocal relationship between irradiance (power density) and exposure time. For the 24-h measurements, statistical equivalence (Fishers protected LSD at the 0.05 level) was noted for most of the combinations of exposure time and power density within a given dose. Generally, the exceptions occurred with the shortest exposure times. SIGNIFICANCE A reciprocal relationship between exposure time and power density adds significance to the study of conversion as a function of the total applied dose. This relationship establishes the curing profile as a universal correlation between exposure time and power density.

[1]  M. Miyazaki,et al.  Effect of light exposure on fracture toughness and flexural strength of light-cured composites. , 1996, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[2]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Wear and Marginal Breakdown of Composites with Various Degrees of Cure , 1997, Journal of dental research.

[3]  R. G. Craig,et al.  Correlation of Parameters used to Estimate Monomer Conversion in a Light-cured Composite , 1988, Journal of dental research.

[4]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Fracture Toughness of Experimental Dental Composites Aged in Ethanol , 1995, Journal of dental research.

[5]  A. Caputo,et al.  Degree of double bond conversion in light-cured composites. , 1987, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[6]  W. Cook,et al.  Thermal aspects of the kinetics of dimethacrylate photopolymerization , 1992 .

[7]  F. Rueggeberg,et al.  Mass loss in urethane/TEGDMA- and Bis-GMA/TEGDMA-based resin composites during post-cure heating. , 1997, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[8]  C. Bowman,et al.  Effects of Composition and Reactivity on the Reaction Kinetics of Dimethacrylate Dimethacrylate Copolymerizations , 1999 .

[9]  C. Bowman,et al.  Reaction Kinetics and Volume Relaxation during Polymerizations of Multiethylene Glycol Dimethacrylates , 1995 .

[10]  W. Cook Photopolymerization kinetics of dimethacrylates using the camphorquinone/amine initiator system , 1992 .

[11]  D. Watts,et al.  The development of surface hardness in visible light-cured posterior composites. , 1986, Journal of dentistry.

[12]  R. G. Gossink,et al.  The effects of volume relaxation and thermal mobilization of trapped radicals on the final conversion of photopolymerized diacrylates , 1984 .

[13]  J. Ferracane,et al.  The effect of resin formulation on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of dental restorative resins. , 1986, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[14]  I. E. Ruyter,et al.  How different curing methods affect the degree of conversion of resin-based inlay/onlay materials. , 1994, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[15]  C. Bowman,et al.  The Influence of Comonomer Composition on Dimethacrylate Resin Properties for Dental Composites , 1996, Journal of dental research.

[16]  I. E. Ruyter,et al.  Composites for use in posterior teeth: composition and conversion. , 1987, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[17]  Jean-Pierre Fouassier,et al.  Photoinitiation, Photopolymerization, and Photocuring: Fundamentals and Applications , 1995 .

[18]  J. Kloosterboer,et al.  Photopolymers exhibiting a large difference between glass transition and curing temperatures , 1990 .

[19]  R. Nomoto,et al.  Effect of light intensity on polymerization of light-cured composite resins. , 1994, Dental materials journal.