Towards a framework for evaluating investments in data warehousing

. Data warehousing technology offers organizations the potential for much greater exploitation of informational assets. However, the evaluation of potential investments in this technology poses problems for organizations as traditional evaluation methods are constrained when dealing with strategic IT applications. Nevertheless, many organizations are procedurally obliged to use such methods for evaluating data warehousing investments. This paper identifies five problems with using such methods in these circumstances: evaluating intangible benefits; making the relationship between IT and profitability explicit; dealing with the vanishing status quo; dealing with the extended investment time frame; and evaluating infrastructural investments. The authors studied how four organizations in the UK and Ireland attempted to overcome these problems when introducing data warehousing, and propose a framework for evaluating data warehousing investments. This framework consists of a high-level analysis of the economic environment and of the information intensity of the relationship between the organization and its customers. Based on the outcome of this analysis, the authors propose four factors that have to be managed during the evaluation process in order to ensure that the limitations of the traditional evaluation techniques do not adversely affect the evaluation process. These factors are: commitment and sponsorship; the approach to evaluation; the time scale of benefits; and the appraisal techniques used.

[1]  J. Ward,et al.  Evaluation and realisation of IS/IT benefits: an empirical study of current practice , 1996 .

[2]  Paul Chapman,et al.  ALL BENEFITS ARE TANGIBLE — I JUST CAN'T GET MY HANDS ON THEM , 1988 .

[3]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Strategic Information Technology Investments: Guidelines for Decision Making , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Roger Clarke,et al.  Evaluation Or Justification? The Application of Cost/benefit Analysis to Computer Matching Schemes , 1997, ECIS.

[5]  Zahir Irani,et al.  The Propagation of Technology Management Taxonomies for Evaluating Investments in Information Systems , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Georgios I. Doukidis,et al.  Rationale and Management of IT Investments in the Case of Greece , 1997, ECIS.

[7]  Barbara Francett Can multiplatform DB2 compete in client/server clutch? , 1994 .

[8]  Robert A. Atkinson,et al.  Reshaping IS Strategic Planning , 1990 .

[9]  E Huerta,et al.  Evaluation of information technology: strategies in Spanish firms , 1999 .

[10]  Bill Nixon,et al.  Technology Investment and Management Accounting Practice , 1995 .

[11]  Joan A. Ballantine,et al.  Financial appraisal and the IS/IT investment decision making process , 1998, J. Inf. Technol..

[12]  P. Keen Value Analysis: Justifying Decision Support Systems , 1993 .

[13]  Guy Fitzgerald,et al.  Evaluating information systems projects: a multidimensional approach , 1998, J. Inf. Technol..

[14]  Gary W. Dickson,et al.  Interview with: Norman Lorentzsen , 1977 .

[15]  Timo Saarinen,et al.  An expanded instrument for evaluating information system success , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[16]  Beat Hochstrasser,et al.  Evaluating IT investments – matching techniques to projects , 1990, J. Inf. Technol..

[17]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Analysing information systems evaluation: another look at an old problem , 1998 .

[18]  C. Sophie Lee,et al.  Modeling the business value of information technology , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[19]  Peter Weill,et al.  Managing Investment in Information Technology: Mini Case Examples and Implications , 1989, MIS Q..