Closure Properties of Independence Concepts for Continuous Utilities

This paper examines nine independence concepts for ordinal and expected utilities: utility and preference independence, weak separability a uniqueness of nonstrict conditional preferences, as well as generalizations that allow for complete indifference or reversal of preferences. Some of these conditions are closed under set-theoretic operations, which simplifies the verification of such assumptions in a practical decision analysis. Preference independence is closed under union without assumptions of strict essentiality, which are however necessary for closure under differences of preference independence and its mentioned generalizations. The well-known additive representation of a utility function is used, in a corrected form with a self-contained proof, to show closure under symmetric difference. This generalizes a classical result of Gorman 1968, and supplements its proof. Generalized utility independence has all, whereas weak separability has no closure properties. An independent set of any kind is utility or preference independent if this holds for a subset. Counterexamples are given throughout to show that the results are as strong as possible. The approach consistently uses conditional functions instead of preference relations, based on simple topological notions like connectivity and continuity.

[1]  B. Stengel,et al.  Decomposition of multiattribute expected-utility functions , 1988 .

[2]  F. Radermacher,et al.  Substitution Decomposition for Discrete Structures and Connections with Combinatorial Optimization , 1984 .

[3]  Bernhard von Stengel,et al.  Eine Dekompositionstheorie für mehrstellige Funktionen mit Anwendungen in Systemtheorie und Operations Research , 1991 .

[4]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives , 1993 .

[5]  Karl Vind.  Note on "The Structure of Utility Functions" , 1971 .

[6]  Peter H. Farquhar,et al.  Errata to “A Survey of Multiattribute Utility Theory and Applications” , 1978 .

[7]  P. Fishburn,et al.  Seven independence concepts and continuous multiattribute utility functions , 1974 .

[8]  W. M. Gorman.  The Structure of Utility Functions , 1968 .

[9]  C. Bliss.  Capital theory and the distribution of income , 1976 .

[10]  A. Tversky,et al.  Foundations of Measurement, Vol. I: Additive and Polynomial Representations , 1991 .

[11]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Multiplicative Utility Functions , 1974, Oper. Res..

[12]  Jaap Van Brakel,et al.  Foundations of measurement , 1983 .

[13]  R. H. Bruck.  A Survey of Binary Systems , 1971 .

[14]  G. Debreu.  Mathematical Economics: Representation of a preference ordering by a numerical function , 1983 .

[15]  M. A. Taylor,et al.  Certain functional equations on groupoids weaker than quasigroups , 1973 .

[16]  King-Tim Mak.  On separability: Functional structure , 1986 .

[17]  Peter P. Wakker,et al.  Continuity of preference relations for separable topologies , 1988 .

[18]  G. Debreu.  Topological Methods in Cardinal Utility Theory , 1959 .

[19]  R. M. Adelson,et al.  Utility Theory for Decision Making , 1971 .

[20]  Patrick Suppes,et al.  MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 1959 , 1960 .

[21]  King-Tim Mak,et al.  Notes on separable preferences , 1984 .

[22]  J. Aczél,et al.  Lectures on Functional Equations and Their Applications , 1968 .

[23]  A. Chateauneuf,et al.  From local to global additive representation , 1993 .

[24]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Generalized Utility Independence and Some Implications , 1975, Oper. Res..

[25]  King-Tim Mak,et al.  Coherent Continuous Systems and the Generalized Functional Equation of Associativity , 1987, Math. Oper. Res..

[26]  J. Aczel,et al.  A Short Course on Functional Equations: Based Upon Recent Applications to the Social and Behavioral Sciences , 1986 .

[27]  Peter P. Wakker,et al.  Continuity of transformations , 1991 .