The tilt-constancy theory of visual illusions.

The authors argue that changes in the perception of vertical and horizontal caused by local visual cues can account for many classical visual illusions. Because the perception of orientation is influenced more by visual cues than gravity-based cues when the observer is tilted (e.g., S. E. Asch & H. A. Witkin, 1948), the authors predicted that the strength of many visual illusions would increase when observers were tilted 30 degrees. The magnitude of Zöllner, Poggendorff, and Ponzo illusions and the tilt-induction effect substantially increased when observers were tilted. In contrast, the Müller-Lyer illusion and a size constancy illusion, which are not related to orientation perception, were not affected by body orientation. Other theoretical approaches do not predict the obtained pattern of results.

[1]  S. Ebenholtz,et al.  Absence of relational determination in the rod-and-frame effect , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  R. Day.  Visual Spatial Illusions: A General Explanation , 1972, Science.

[3]  A. Pressey,et al.  An extension of assimilation theory to illusions of size, area, and direction , 1971 .

[4]  I. Rock.  The perception of disoriented figures. , 1974, Scientific American.

[5]  E. Boring.  Sensation and Perception. (Scientific Books: Sensation and Perception in the History of Experimental Psychology) , 1943 .

[6]  D. Goodenough,et al.  The rod-and-frame illusion in erect and supine observers , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  E. Greene,et al.  Angular Induction as a Function of Contact and Target Orientation , 1989, Perception.

[8]  D H Krantz,et al.  The Poggendorff illusion: consider all the angles. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Size interactions in the perception of orientation , 1983 .

[10]  D. Spinelli,et al.  The gap between rod and frame influences the rod-and-frame effect with small and large inducing displays , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Lothar Spillmann,et al.  Sensory Experience, Adaptation, and Perception : Festschrift for Ivo Kohler , 1984 .

[12]  L. M. Ward,et al.  The effect of optically induced blur on the magnitude of the Mueller-Lyer illusion , 1976 .

[13]  S. Velinsky.  VI. Explication physiologique del'illusion de Poggendorf , 1925 .

[14]  H. Helmholtz,et al.  Popular lectures on scientific subjects. , 1873 .

[15]  B Moulden,et al.  The Effect of Body Tilt on the Zöllner Illusion , 1973, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  A. Pressey,et al.  Assimilation theory and the Ponzo illusion: quantitative predictions. , 1971, Canadian journal of psychology.

[17]  W. Banks,et al.  Figural goodness effects in perception and memory , 1979 .

[18]  Laura A. Carlson-Radvansky,et al.  The Influence of Reference Frame Selection on Spatial Template Construction , 1997 .

[19]  No evidence for apparent extent between parallels as the basis of the Poggendorff effect , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  R. T. Green,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF SPATIAL ORIENTATION ON THE POGGENDORFF ILLUSION. , 1964, Acta psychologica.

[21]  L C Robertson,et al.  Covert orienting biases in scene-based reference frames: orientation priming and visual field differences. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  G. Singer,et al.  The effect of structure and degree of tilt on the tilted room illusion , 1970 .

[23]  The Mystery spot Illusion and Its Relation to Other Visual Illusions , 1999 .

[24]  S. Coren,et al.  An orientation illusion analog to the rod and frame: Relational effects in the magnitude of the distortion , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  R. W. Ditchburn.  Seeing is Deceiving: The Psychology of Visual Illusions , 1979 .

[26]  T. Künnapas,et al.  Influence of frame size on apparent length of a line. , 1955 .

[27]  C. R. Fox,et al.  Visually perceived eye level and perceived elevation of objects: Linearly additive influences from visual field pitch and from gravity , 1989, Vision Research.

[28]  H. Bouma,et al.  Induced changes in the perceived orientation of line segments. , 1970, Vision research.

[29]  P. Wenderoth.  The Distinction between the Rod-and-Frame Illusion and the Rod-and-Frame Test , 1974, Perception.

[30]  A. Pressey,et al.  Acute Angles and the Poggendorff Illusion † , 1972, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[31]  A. Pressey,et al.  Spatial attention in Ponzo-like patterns , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  Ian P Howard,et al.  The Contribution of Motion, the Visual Frame, and Visual Polarity to Sensations of Body Tilt , 1994, Perception.

[33]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Lateral Inhibition between Orientation Detectors in the Human Visual System , 1970, Nature.

[34]  J. P. Harris,et al.  Illusion-Destruction by Appropriate Scaling , 1975 .

[35]  R. Gregory,et al.  Distortion of Visual Space as Inappropriate Constancy Scaling , 1963, Nature.

[36]  William B. Templeton,et al.  The role of gravitational cues in the judgment of visual orientation , 1973 .

[37]  S. Coren,et al.  Assimilation and contrast illusions: Differences in plasticity , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  M Behrmann,et al.  Attention accesses multiple reference frames: evidence from visual neglect. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  R Over,et al.  Tilt aftereffects in central and peripheral vision. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[40]  P. Wenderoth,et al.  The different mechanisms of the direct and indirect tilt illusions , 1988, Vision Research.

[41]  D. Spinelli,et al.  Modulation of the Rod-And-Frame Illusion by Additional External Stimuli , 1995, Perception.

[42]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Human visual orientation , 1982 .

[43]  A. Pressey,et al.  The role of apparent distance in the Poggendorff illusion , 1976 .

[44]  H. A. Witkin,et al.  Studies in space orientation. II. Perception of the upright with displaced visual fields and with body tilted. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[45]  David H. Krantz,et al.  The Poggendorff illusion: Amputations, rotations, and other perturbations , 1971 .

[46]  L Matin,et al.  Visually perceived eye level: changes induced by a pitched-from-vertical 2-line visual field. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  S. Coren.  An efferent component in the visual perception of direction and extent. , 1986, Psychological review.

[48]  S. Ebenholtz,et al.  Modulation of the rod and frame effect: Retinal angle vs apparent size , 1980 .

[49]  R. T. GREEN,et al.  The Poggendorff Illusion as a Constancy Phenomenon , 1963, Nature.

[50]  S. Coren,et al.  An empirical taxonomy of visual illusions , 1976 .

[51]  Bruce Bridgeman,et al.  Spatial context affects the Poggendorff illusion , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  R. Day,et al.  A note on apparent displacement of lines and dots on oblique parallels , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[53]  False Perspectives , 1981, Perception.

[54]  F. Campbell,et al.  The tilt after-effect: a fresh look. , 1971, Vision research.

[55]  J. Gibson,et al.  Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies , 1937 .

[56]  H. A. Witkin,et al.  Studies in space orientation; further experiments on perception of the upright with displaced visual fields. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[57]  H. Leibowitz,et al.  The effect of rotation and tilt on the magnitude of the Poggendorf illusion. , 1966, Vision research.

[58]  I Rock,et al.  The rod-and-frame effect as a function of the righting of the frame. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[59]  J. Gibson.  Adaptation, after-effect, and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. II. Simultaneous contrast and the areal restriction of the after-effect. , 1937 .

[60]  M M Cohen,et al.  Judgments of eye level in light and in darkness , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[61]  H. A. Witkin,et al.  Studies in space orientation; perception of the upright in the absence of a visual field. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[62]  R. Yin.  Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[63]  E. Peterhans,et al.  Neural Integration of Visual Information and Direction of Gravity in Prestriate Cortex of the Alert Monkey , 1995 .

[64]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Gravity and the tilt aftereffect , 1982, Vision Research.

[65]  Sheldon M. Ebenholtz,et al.  Determinants of the rod and frame effect: The role of retinal size , 1977 .

[66]  L Matin,et al.  Visually Perceived Eye Level is Influenced Identically by Lines from Erect and Pitched Planes , 1996, Perception.