Technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution based predictive handoff for heterogeneous networks

This study presents an efficient handoff algorithm for heterogeneous networks comprising macrocells, microcells, picocells, and femtocells. The proposed algorithm is based on call admission control (CAC) for selecting target base station (BS) from a list of neighbouring candidate BSs, as well as using the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) as decision method. The introduced algorithm takes into account multiple criteria including measured received signal strength (RSS) and signal-to-interference-plus noise ratio (SINR), predicted RSS and SINR, and number of free resource blocks of neighbouring BSs. With the use of TOPSIS, neighbouring BSs are ordered based on their priority determined using the five mentioned criteria. Selection of target BS from ordered list is then performed using CAC. Also, coverage expansion is used to retain the connection when there is not any BS for handoff. In addition, in order to predict the RSS and SINR samples, the logistic smooth transition autoregressive model is used. Performance of the proposed algorithm is evaluated in terms of ping-pong rate, outage probability, and throughput. The results indicate efficiency of the proposed algorithm in reducing number of unnecessary handoffs while significantly increasing throughput and decreasing connection dropping when compared with conventional algorithms.

[1]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Heterogeneous cellular networks: From theory to practice , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[2]  Jeffrey H. Reed,et al.  Handoff in cellular systems , 1998, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[3]  Dong-Ho Cho,et al.  Efficient handoff algorithm for inbound mobility in hierarchical macro/femto cell networks , 2009, IEEE Communications Letters.

[4]  Navrati Saxena,et al.  Multi-objective handover in LTE macro/femto-cell networks , 2012, Journal of Communications and Networks.

[5]  S. Tekinay,et al.  Handover and channel assignment in mobile cellular networks , 1991, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[6]  Won-Joo Hwang,et al.  Predictive Association Control for Frequent Handover Avoidance in Femtocell Networks , 2013, IEEE Communications Letters.

[7]  Zhu Xiao,et al.  Dynamic user equipment-based hysteresis-adjusting algorithm in LTE femtocell networks , 2014, IET Commun..

[8]  Ronny Yongho Kim,et al.  WiMAX femtocell: requirements, challenges, and solutions , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[9]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Spectrum allocation in tiered cellular networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[10]  Peng Xu,et al.  An efficient handoff algorithm based on received signal strength and wireless transmission loss in hierarchical cell networks , 2013, Telecommun. Syst..

[11]  Timo Teräsvirta,et al.  Testing linearity against smooth transition autoregressive models , 1988 .

[12]  Sueng Jae Bae,et al.  Interference Analysis for Femtocell Deployment in OFDMA Systems Based on Fractional Frequency Reuse , 2011, IEEE Communications Letters.

[13]  M. Gudmundson Correlation Model for Shadow Fading in Mobile Radio Systems , 1991 .

[14]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Femtocells: Past, Present, and Future , 2012, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[15]  Larry J. Greenstein,et al.  An empirically based path loss model for wireless channels in suburban environments , 1999, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[16]  Mostafa Zaman Chowdhury,et al.  Handover management in high-dense femtocellular networks , 2013, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[17]  Timo Teräsvirta,et al.  Aspects of modelling nonlinear time series , 1986 .

[18]  Youngju Kim,et al.  Performance Analysis of Two-Tier Femtocell Networks with Outage Constraints , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.