Detecting motion intention in stroke survivors using autonomic nervous system responses

Individuals with severe neurologic injuries often cannot participate in robotic rehabilitation because they do not retain sufficient residual motor control to initiate the robotic assistance. In these situations, brain- and body-computer interfaces have emerged as promising solutions to control robotic devices. In a previous experiment conducted with healthy subjects, we showed that detecting motor execution accurately was possible using only the autonomic nervous system (ANS) response. In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of such a body-machine interface to detect motion intention by monitoring the ANS response in stroke survivors. Four physiological signals were measured (blood pressure, breathing rate, skin conductance response and heart rate) while participants executed and imagined a grasping task with their impaired hand. The physiological signals were then used to train a classifier based on hidden Markov models. We performed an experiment with four chronic stroke survivors to test the effectiveness of the classifier to detect rest, motor execution and motor imagery periods. We found that motion execution can be accurately classified based only on peripheral autonomic signals with an accuracy of 72.4%. The accuracy of classifying motion imagery was 62.4%. Therefore, attempting to move was a more effective strategy than imagining the movement. These results are encouraging to perform further research on the use of the ANS response in body-machine interfaces.

[1]  Robert Riener,et al.  Motor execution detection based on autonomic nervous system responses , 2013, Physiological measurement.

[2]  C. Braun,et al.  Motor learning elicited by voluntary drive. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  C. Neuper,et al.  Combining Brain–Computer Interfaces and Assistive Technologies: State-of-the-Art and Challenges , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[4]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Conversion of EEG activity into cursor movement by a brain-computer interface (BCI) , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  Raphael Zimmermann A brain-body-robot interface for sensorimotor rehabilitation following neurological injury , 2013 .

[6]  J. Baron,et al.  Motor Imagery: A Backdoor to the Motor System After Stroke? , 2006, Stroke.

[7]  J.P. Donoghue,et al.  BCI meeting 2005-workshop on clinical issues and applications , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Vegetative response during imagined movement is proportional to mental effort , 1991, Behavioural Brain Research.

[9]  Jaime Gómez Gil,et al.  Brain Computer Interfaces, a Review , 2012, Sensors.

[10]  Olivier Lambercy,et al.  Design and characterization of the ReHapticKnob, a robot for assessment and therapy of hand function , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[11]  R. Riener,et al.  Real-Time Closed-Loop Control of Cognitive Load in Neurological Patients During Robot-Assisted Gait Training , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[12]  P. Rossini,et al.  Integrated technology for evaluation of brain function and neural plasticity. , 2004, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[13]  Ravi Vaidyanathan,et al.  2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON REHABILITATION ROBOTICS (ICORR) , 2011 .

[14]  Tom Chau,et al.  Classification of Activity Engagement in Individuals with Severe Physical Disabilities Using Signals of the Peripheral Nervous System , 2012, PloS one.

[15]  Monica A. Perez,et al.  Motor skill training induces changes in the excitability of the leg cortical area in healthy humans , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  A. Mihailidis,et al.  Peripheral Autonomic Signals as Access Pathways for Individuals with Severe Disabilities: A Literature Appraisal , 2008 .

[17]  Ph.D. Dr. Juha T. Korpelainen M.D.,et al.  Autonomic nervous system disorders in stroke , 2006, Clinical Autonomic Research.

[18]  Clemens Brunner,et al.  Better than random? A closer look on BCI results , 2008 .

[19]  M. Munih,et al.  Psychophysiological Measurements in a Biocooperative Feedback Loop for Upper Extremity Rehabilitation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.