Physician Review Websites: Effects of the Proportion and Position of Negative Reviews on Readers’ Willingness to Choose the Doctor

Health consumers are increasingly turning to physician review websites to research potential health care providers. This experiment examined how the proportion and position of negative reviews on such websites influence readers’ willingness to choose the reviewed physician. A 5 × 2 (Proportion of Negative Reviews × Position of Negative Reviews) factorial design was implemented, augmented with two standalone comparison groups. Five hundred participants were recruited through a crowdsource website and were randomly assigned to read a webpage screenshot corresponding to 1 of 12 experimental conditions. The participants then completed a questionnaire that assessed evaluations of and cognitive elaborations (thoughts) about the physician. The authors hypothesized that readers would be less willing to use a physician's services when reviews were predominantly negative and negative comments were positioned before positive comments. As hypothesized, an increase in the proportion of negative reviews led to a reduced willingness to use the physician's services. However, this effect was not moderated by the level of cognitive elaboration. A primacy effect was found for negative reviews such that readers were less willing to use the physician's services when negative reviews were presented before positive reviews, rather than after. Implications for future research are discussed.

[1]  T. Lagu,et al.  Patients’ Evaluations of Health Care Providers in the Era of Social Networking: An Analysis of Physician-Rating Websites , 2010, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[2]  Eun-Ju Lee,et al.  What Do Others’ Reactions to News on Internet Portal Sites Tell Us? Effects of Presentation Format and Readers’ Need for Cognition on Reality Perception , 2010, Commun. Res..

[3]  Axel Westerwick,et al.  Effects of Sponsorship, Web Site Design, and Google Ranking on the Credibility of Online Information , 2013, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[4]  David C. DeAndrea,et al.  The Influence of Online Comments on Perceptions of Antimarijuana Public Service Announcements on YouTube , 2010 .

[5]  R. L. Rosnow,et al.  Whatever happened to the "Law of Primacy"? , 1966, The Journal of communication.

[6]  Uwe Sander,et al.  Eight Questions About Physician-Rating Websites: A Systematic Review , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[7]  Michael J Sacopulos,et al.  Online Doctor Reviews: Do They Track Surgeon Volume, a Proxy for Quality of Care? , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[8]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Communication Processes in Participatory Websites , 2012, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[9]  Jeffrey J Segal,et al.  The role of the Internet in doctor performance rating. , 2009, Pain physician.

[10]  A. Jha,et al.  A Changing Landscape of Physician Quality Reporting: Analysis of Patients’ Online Ratings of Their Physicians Over a 5-Year Period , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[11]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. , 1999 .

[12]  Daniel P. Lorence,et al.  Assessing Health Consumerism on the Web: A Demographic Profile of Information-Seeking Behaviors , 2006, Journal of Medical Systems.

[13]  Ali Hortaçsu,et al.  Economic Insights from Internet Auctions , 2004 .

[14]  Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin,et al.  Choosing a Health Care Provider: The Role of Quality Information , 2008 .

[15]  Cong Li Primacy effect or recency effect? A long-term memory test of Super Bowl commercials , 2009 .

[16]  Curtis P. Haugtvedt,et al.  Message Order Effects in Persuasion: An Attitude Strength Perspective , 1994 .

[17]  B. Landon,et al.  The Availability and Nature of Physician Information on the Internet , 2010, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[18]  D. Strech,et al.  The representation of patient experience and satisfaction in physician rating sites. A criteria-based analysis of English- and German-language sites , 2010, BMC health services research.

[19]  B. Love,et al.  Work and “Mass Personal” Communication as Means of Navigating Nutrition and Exercise Concerns in an Online Cancer Community , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[20]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Source factors and the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion , 1984 .

[21]  Ahmer Farooq,et al.  Online reviews of 500 urologists. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[22]  K. Harris,et al.  How do patients choose physicians? Evidence from a national survey of enrollees in employment-related health plans. , 2003, Health services research.

[23]  David H. Reiley,et al.  Pennies from Ebay: The Determinants of Price in Online Auctions , 2000 .

[24]  M. Fishbein,et al.  Evaluating the Risk and Attractiveness of Romantic Partners When Confronted with Contradictory Cues , 2007, AIDS and Behavior.

[25]  Peter C. Neijens,et al.  The Ironic Effect of Source Identificationon the Perceived Credibility of Online Product Reviewers , 2012, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[26]  Anindita Chakravarty,et al.  The Differential Effects of Online Word-of-Mouth and Critics’ Reviews on Pre-release Movie Evaluation , 2009 .

[27]  R. H. Stewart EFFECT OF CONTINUOUS RESPONDING ON THE ORDER EFFECT IN PERSONALITY IMPRESSION FORMATION. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  J. Wooders,et al.  Reputation in Auctions: Theory, and Evidence from Ebay , 2006 .

[29]  Abraham S. Luchins,et al.  Definitiveness of Impression and Primacy-Recency in Communications , 1958 .

[30]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[31]  U. Sarkar,et al.  What Patients Say About Their Doctors Online: A Qualitative Content Analysis , 2012, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[32]  Dipayan Biswas,et al.  Making judgments in a two‐sequence cue environment: The effects of differential cue strengths, order sequence, and distraction , 2009 .

[33]  J. Livingston How Valuable Is a Good Reputation? A Sample Selection Model of Internet Auctions , 2005, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[34]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  Aparna H. Kolli,et al.  Social Media, Surgeons, and the Internet: An Era or an Error? , 2012, The American surgeon.

[36]  S. Asch Forming impressions of personality. , 1946, Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

[37]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[38]  Alex Macario,et al.  Analysis of 4999 Online Physician Ratings Indicates That Most Patients Give Physicians a Favorable Rating , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[39]  Shaili Jain Googling ourselves--what physicians can learn from online rating sites. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[40]  Chezy Ofir,et al.  Context Effects on Judgment under Uncertainty , 1984 .

[41]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[42]  Paul Resnick,et al.  The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment , 2002 .