The importance of the regimen of screening in maximizing the benefit and minimizing the harms.

BACKGROUND In CT screening for lung cancer, the regimen of screening is critical in diagnosing lung cancer early while limiting unnecessary tests and invasive procedures. The International Early Lung Cancer Action Program (I-ELCAP) has developed a regimen based on evidence collected in the I-ELCAP cohort of more than 70,000 participants. METHODS Important in the development of the regimen is the recognition of the profound difference between the first, baseline round of screening and all subsequent rounds of repeat screening. For each person undergoing screening, the baseline round happens only once while repeat rounds will be performed annually for many years. This difference needs to be clearly recognized as it is these annual rounds which allow for identification of small, early, yet aggressive, lung cancers which have high cure rates despite their aggressiveness. The importance of nodule consistency and size are key factors in the regimen. The regimen needs to be continuously updated by incorporating advances in technology and knowledge. RESULTS The use of the I-ELCAP regimen reduces the workup of participants in the screening program to less than 10% in the baseline round and less than 6% in the annual repeat rounds. By use of this regimen, estimated cure rate of lung cancers diagnosed under screening is 80% or higher in both baseline and annual repeat rounds. CONCLUSIONS The I-ELCAP collaboration provides a new paradigm that answers the 2002 NCI call for multiple approaches to address relevant questions about screening and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) Roundtable on Evidence-based Medicine from the National Academy of Science's call for a "new clinical research paradigm that takes better advantage of data generated in the course of healthcare delivery would speed and improve the development of evidence for real-world decision making".

[1]  David F Yankelevitz,et al.  Solitary and multiple resected adenocarcinomas after CT screening for lung cancer: histopathologic features and their prognostic implications. , 2009, Lung cancer.

[2]  C. Henschke,et al.  CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Part-Solid Nodules in Baseline and Annual Repeat Rounds. , 2016, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  Paolo Boffetta,et al.  The impact of the regimen of screening on lung cancer cure: a comparison of I-ELCAP and NLST , 2015, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[4]  C. Henschke,et al.  CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Nonsolid Nodules in Baseline and Annual Repeat Rounds. , 2015, Radiology.

[5]  D. Lynch,et al.  The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. , 2011, Radiology.

[6]  Ali O. Farooqi,et al.  Lung cancers diagnosed at annual CT screening: volume doubling times. , 2012, Radiology.

[7]  Antoni B. Chan,et al.  On measuring the change in size of pulmonary nodules , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  David F Yankelevitz,et al.  Frequency of coronary artery calcification on low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer. , 2006, Clinical imaging.

[9]  David F Yankelevitz,et al.  Definition of a Positive Test Result in Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[10]  W. Travis WHO classification of tumours of the lung, pleura, thymus and heart , 2015 .

[11]  C. Henschke,et al.  Smoking Cessation and Relapse during a Lung Cancer Screening Program , 2009, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[12]  Millennia Foy,et al.  Assessment of lung-cancer mortality reduction from CT Screening. , 2011, Lung cancer.

[13]  Rowena Yip,et al.  Small-cell carcinoma of the lung detected by CT screening: stage distribution and curability. , 2012, Lung cancer.

[14]  A. Nicholson,et al.  The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for Coding T Categories for Subsolid Nodules and Assessment of Tumor Size in Part‐Solid Tumors in the Forthcoming Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification of Lung Cancer , 2016, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[15]  Harry J de Koning,et al.  Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  G. Byrnes,et al.  Screening for lung cancer. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[17]  Peter C Gøtzsche,et al.  Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography , 2001, The Lancet.

[18]  B. Southern,et al.  Managing interstitial lung disease detected on CT during lung cancer screening , 2015 .

[19]  David F Yankelevitz,et al.  Understanding the core result of the National Lung Screening Trial. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Anthony P. Reeves,et al.  CT Screening for lung cancer: diagnoses resulting from the New York Early Lung Cancer Action Project. , 2007, Radiology.

[21]  A. Hartz,et al.  A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  L. Tanoue,et al.  Reduced lung cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening , 2011 .

[23]  Michael F. McNitt-Gray,et al.  ACR–STR Practice Parameter for the Performance and Reporting of Lung Cancer Screening Thoracic Computed Tomography (CT): 2014 (Resolution 4)* , 2014, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[24]  K. Rosenzweig,et al.  Radiation therapy for stage I lung cancer detected on computed tomography screening: results from the international early lung cancer action program , 2014, Journal of Radiation Oncology.

[25]  Yang Xue-ning International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Classification of Lung Adenocarcinoma , 2011 .

[26]  C. Henschke,et al.  Pathologic Findings of Lung Tumors Diagnosed on Baseline CT Screening , 2006, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[27]  C. Henschke,et al.  Comparison of pathologic findings of baseline and annual repeat cancers diagnosed on CT screening. , 2007, Lung cancer.

[28]  William J Kostis,et al.  Overdiagnosis in chest radiographic screening for lung carcinoma , 2003, Cancer.

[29]  O. Miettinen,et al.  Survival of Patients with Stage I Lung Cancer Detected on CT Screening , 2008 .

[30]  M. Mascalchi,et al.  Lung Cancer Associated With Cystic Airspaces , 2015, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[31]  P. Gøtzsche,et al.  Mammographic screening: no reliable supporting evidence? , 2002, The Lancet.

[32]  O. Miettinen,et al.  Evaluation of screening for a cancer: annotated catechism of the Gold Standard creed. , 2003, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[33]  C. Henschke,et al.  SECONDHAND TOBACCO SMOKE IN NEVER SMOKERS IS A SIGNIFICANT RISK FACTOR FOR CORONARY ARTERY CALCIFICATION , 2013 .

[34]  L. Tanoue,et al.  CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Suspiciousness of Nodules According to Size on Baseline Scans , 2006 .

[35]  O S Miettinen,et al.  Radiographic screening for cancer. Proposed paradigm for requisite research. , 1994, Clinical imaging.

[36]  Masahiro Tsuboi,et al.  International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Classification of Lung Adenocarcinoma , 2011, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[37]  O. Miettinen,et al.  CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[38]  P. Prorok,et al.  Cancer screening trials: nuts and bolts. , 2010, Seminars in oncology.

[39]  O. Miettinen,et al.  Screening for lung cancer: the early lung cancer action approach. , 2002, Lung cancer.

[40]  P C Prorok,et al.  Design of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. , 2000, Controlled clinical trials.

[41]  J. Hanley Analysis of Mortality Data From Cancer Screening Studies: Looking in the Right Window , 2005, Epidemiology.

[42]  O. Miettinen,et al.  Early lung cancer action project pathology protocol. , 2003, Lung cancer.

[43]  C. Henschke,et al.  Sublobar resection is equivalent to lobectomy for clinical stage 1A lung cancer in solid nodules. , 2014, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[44]  Matthias Schroder,et al.  The Learning Healthcare System Workshop Summary , 2016 .

[45]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Lung image database consortium: developing a resource for the medical imaging research community. , 2004, Radiology.

[46]  David F Yankelevitz,et al.  Retrospective review of lung cancers diagnosed in annual rounds of CT screening. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[47]  Maria Padilla,et al.  JOURNAL CLUB: Evidence of Interstitial Lung Disease on Low-Dose Chest CT Images: Prevalence, Patterns, and Progression. , 2016, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[48]  P. Prorok,et al.  Issues in the mortality analysis of randomized controlled trials of cancer screening. , 1994, Controlled clinical trials.

[49]  David F Yankelevitz,et al.  Coronary artery calcification on low-dose computed tomography: comparison of Agatston and Ordinal Scores. , 2015, Clinical imaging.

[50]  C. Henschke,et al.  Low- vs. standard-dose coronary artery calcium scanning. , 2015, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[51]  O. Miettinen,et al.  Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening , 1999, The Lancet.

[52]  Ali O. Farooqi,et al.  CT screening for lung cancer: prevalence and incidence of mediastinal masses. , 2006, Radiology.

[53]  Rowena Yip,et al.  Ordinal scoring of coronary artery calcifications on low-dose CT scans of the chest is predictive of death from cardiovascular disease. , 2010, Radiology.

[54]  M. R. Armstrong,et al.  ACR CT Accreditation Program and the Lung Cancer Screening Program Designation. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[55]  Simina C. Fluture,et al.  Small pulmonary nodules: reproducibility of three-dimensional volumetric measurement and estimation of time to follow-up CT. , 2004, Radiology.

[56]  J. Concato,et al.  Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[57]  O. Miettinen,et al.  Computed tomographic screening for lung cancer: the relationship of disease stage to tumor size. , 2006, Archives of internal medicine.

[58]  O. Miettinen,et al.  CT screening for lung cancer: suspiciousness of nodules according to size on baseline scans. , 2004, Radiology.

[59]  D. Aberle An update of CT screening for lung cancer. , 2005, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[60]  David F Yankelevitz,et al.  Breast density: comparison of chest CT with mammography. , 2013, Radiology.