The critical element model: A modeling philosophy

Abstract The advent of composite primary structures has presented the technical community with several challenges. Not the least of these is the need to answer the question, “How long will this composite component last?”. One of the most basic issues associated with this question is the matter of how to describe (and predict) behavior that is influenced and controlled by complex combinations and interactions of the multiple damage modes know to occur in composite materials. The present paper suggests a mechanistic approach to this problem which is generally known as the “critical element model” (CEM). The CEM is not so much a single model as a modeling philosophy which proposes that the damage process that ultimately leads to initiation of the fracture event can be modeled by using a micro-mechanical analysis to determine local stress redistribution caused by the failure of “subcritical elements”, and phenomenological (constitutive) information to characterize the condition of the “critical elements” which control fracture. This approach has a variety of advantages, and provides a framework for the incorporation of improved descriptions and analysis of micro-events as they become available. At the same time, it is presently operable at the elementary engineering level in convenient coded form and has been used to predict the behavior of composite coupons subjected to a variety of tensile and compressive load cycles including block loading. Some 270 tests have been compared with the predictions with encouraging results. A summary of these activities and the general philosophy will be presented in the paper.

[1]  Lj Broutman,et al.  A New Theory to Predict Cumulative Fatigue Damage in Fiberglass Reinforced Plastics , 1972 .

[2]  R. Talreja,et al.  Fatigue of composite materials: damage mechanisms and fatigue-life diagrams , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[3]  W. W. Stinchcomb,et al.  Cumulative Damage Model for Advanced Composite Materials. , 1982 .

[4]  Gerald Kress,et al.  Fatigue response of notched graphite/epoxy laminates , 1985 .

[5]  H. Hahn,et al.  Proof Testing of Composite Materials , 1975 .

[6]  Robert Croman,et al.  Residual Strength in Fatigue Based on the Strength-Life Equal Rank Assumption , 1978 .

[7]  Kenneth Reifsnider,et al.  Advanced Fatigue Damage Development in Graphite Epoxy Laminates. , 1982 .

[8]  Charles E. Bakis,et al.  Response of thick, notched laminates subjected to tension-compression cyclic loads , 1986 .

[9]  Sumio Murakami,et al.  A Continuum Theory of Creep and Creep Damage , 1981 .

[10]  Kenneth Reifsnider,et al.  Some fundamental aspects of the fatigue and fracture response of composite materials , 1977 .

[11]  Wayne W. Stinchcomb,et al.  Effects of moisture, residual thermal curing stresses, and mechanical load on the damage development in quasi-isotropic laminates , 1982 .

[12]  R. Kim,et al.  Fatigue Behavior of Composite Laminate , 1976 .

[13]  T. Kevin O'Brien Stiffness Change as a Nondestructive Damage Measurement , 1980 .

[14]  Ww Stinchcomb,et al.  Compression Fatigue Damage in Thick, Notched Graphite/Epoxy Laminates , 1983 .

[15]  Kenneth Reifsnider,et al.  Stiffness-reduction mechanisms in composite laminates , 1982 .

[16]  Edmund G. Henneke,et al.  Defect Property Relationships in Composite Materials. , 1976 .

[17]  Dominique Leguillon,et al.  Homogenized constitutive law for a partially cohesive composite material , 1982 .