Choice and rate of reinforcement.

Pigeons' responses in the presence of two concurrently available (initial-link) stimuli produced one of two different (terminal-link) stimuli. The rate of reinforcement in the presence of one terminal-link stimulus was three times that of the other. Three different pairs of identical but independent variable-interval schedules controlled entry into the terminal links. When the intermediate pair was in effect, the pigeons distributed their (choice) responses in the presence of the concurrently available stimuli of the initial links in the same proportion as reinforcements were distributed in the mutually exclusive terminal links. This finding was consistent with those of earlier studies. When either the pair of larger or smaller variable-interval schedules was in effect, however, proportions of choice responses did not match proportions of reinforcements. In addition, matching was not obtained when entry into the terminal links was controlled by unequal variable-interval schedules. A formulation consistent with extant data states that choice behavior is dependent upon the amount of reduction in the expected time to primary reinforcement, as signified by entry into one terminal link, relative to the amount of reduction in expected time to reinforcement signified by entry into the other terminal link.

[1]  G S REYNOLDS,et al.  Potency of Conditioned Reinforcers Based on Food and on Food and Punishment , 1963, Science.

[2]  R. Herrnstein SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT. , 1964, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  R. Herrnstein APERIODICITY AS A FACTOR IN CHOICE. , 1964, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  R. Poppen,et al.  STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AND THE RESPONSE-REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY. , 1964, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  S. Pliskoff,et al.  A method for increasing the reinforcement magnitude of intracranial stimulation. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  E Fantino,et al.  Preference for mixed- versus fixed-ratio schedules. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  Howard Rachlin The effect of shock intensity on concurrent and single-key responding in concurrent-chain schedules. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND NUMBER OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENTS1 , 1968 .

[9]  E Fantino,et al.  Effects of required rates of responding upon choice. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.