BRIDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER

The city and county of Denver, Colorado, (CCD) Public Works Department is in charge of maintaining and inspecting the entire public infrastructure, including approximately 750 bridges. The purpose of this paper is to report on a project that has been recently undertaken between the University of Colorado at Denver and the CCD Public Works Department regarding a bridge management system. The pilot study utilized in the initial stages of this study was applied to bridges located within a small area inside the CCD boundaries. The final prototype is a geographic information system whereby queries on the bridge database can be conducted using a map interface. Ultimately, the geographic information system prototype will become the primary bridge management system for the CCD, containing a wide array of information for all bridges in the CCD's inventory. This includes an application of a Markovian deterioration model for condition assessment prediction and hence budget allocation preparation for all applicable bridges. In general, the system provides structure for overall bridge management and also helps preserve and manage historical bridge files.

[1]  Howard J Simkowitz USING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY TO ENHANCE THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROCESS , 1990 .

[2]  Kevin L. Rens,et al.  GAUGE CAPABILITY ANALYSIS IN DATA COLLECTION FOR ACOUSTIC TOMOGRAPHY , 1999 .

[3]  Stephen P. Brooks,et al.  Markov Decision Processes. , 1995 .

[4]  George Hearn,et al.  Performance of NDE methods in bridge inspection , 1998, Smart Structures.

[5]  William T. Scherer,et al.  Markovian Models for Bridge Maintenance Management , 1994 .

[6]  Ahmad Hadavi Incorporation of nondestructive evaluation in Pontis Bridge Management System , 1998, Smart Structures.

[7]  Gurdev Singh,et al.  GIS Model for Concrete Bridge Maintenance Database , 1997 .

[8]  W. Arthur Barrett,et al.  Bridge Management Program for the MTA's Inspection and Inventory Program , 1997 .

[9]  Kumares C. Sinha,et al.  Comparison of Methodologies to Predict Bridge Deterioration , 1997 .

[10]  Raymond A Hartle,et al.  Bridge Inspector's Training Manual/90 , 1995 .

[11]  Deborah M Freund,et al.  POTENTIAL FOR GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT , 1990 .

[12]  Kevin L. Rens,et al.  RECENT TRENDS IN NONDESTRUCTIVE INSPECTIONS IN STATE HIGHWAY AGENCIES. TECHNICAL NOTE , 1998 .

[13]  R. Frank Carmichael,et al.  Microcomputer Bridge Management System , 1993 .

[14]  Kevin L. Rens,et al.  Condition Index Assessment for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Civil Works , 1999 .

[15]  Kevin L. Rens,et al.  Review of nondestructive evaluation techniques of civil infrastructure , 1999 .

[16]  L Lindbladh BRIDGE MANAGEMENT WITHIN THE SWEDISH NATIONAL ROAD ADMINISTRATION. BRIDGE MANAGEMENT. INSPECTION, MAINTENANCE, ASSESSMENT AND REPAIR. PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BRIDGE MANAGEMENT, UNIVERSITY OF SURREY, GUILDFORD, MARCH 28-30, 1990 , 1990 .

[17]  Lynn E. Johnson,et al.  USABILITY ASSESSMENTS FOR HYDROLOGIC FORECASTING DSS 1 , 1998 .